Cases

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice, dissenting. The majority and the State confuse preservation with the responsibility to direct the trial court on precisely how to fix the problem. Restated, the question regarding preservation presented herein is whether an objection is sufficient if it points out the problem, or must it also state the cure? Defense counsel made a timely and specific objection, not unlike Vinny Gambini

Opinion by White, J. § 342. Neiu cause of action; statute of limitations. Where the amended petition sets up a cause of action new and entirely different and distinct from that stated in the original petition, it cannot be held to relate back to the date of the filing of the first petition, so as to pre • vent the running of the statute of limitations. And the special exception of defendant setting up t

6 Utah 2d 394 (1957) 315 P.2d 273 KEITH L. KNIGHT, D/B/A KNIGHT REALTY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, v. ROSS H. CHAMBERLAIN, DEFENDANT AND RESPONDENT. No. 8623. Supreme Court of Utah. August 28, 1957. Richards & Bird, Salt Lake City, for appellant. O.W. Adams, Jr., Salt Lake City, for respondent. CROCKETT, Justice. <

Argued April 26, 1944. Plaintiffs appeal from an order refusing to lift a nonsuit in an action for personal injuries sustained on April 28, 1942. Minor plaintiff, on a bicycle, was struck and injured by an automobile owned by defendant and operated by Charles Strasser, a six-foot four-inch youth of eighteen, who had no operator's license. Defendant was not present at the time of the accident. The court below was of opinion that plaintiffs failed to show either that Strasser was defendant's se

Blackford, J. Trespass quare clausum fregit. Special demurrer to the declaration, and judgment for the defendant. The declaration commences as follows:—Shelby county, ss. Elzy Rucker, by Westley Rucker, who is admitted by the Court here to prosecute for the plaintiff, who is an infant within the age of 21 years, as the guardian of the said plaintiff, complains, &am;

NUMBER 13-20-00109-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ALEJANDRO CABALLERO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of C

Cite as 2020 Ark. 68 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-19-17 Opinion Delivered: February 20, 2020 RANDALL THOMAS MCARTY APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE CLARK V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 10CR-92-111] S

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 27, 2023 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00275-CR ISRAEL TORRES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas

714 S.E.2d 109 (2011) 310 Ga. App. 597 CITY OF ATLANTA v. BENATOR et al. Benator et al. v. K & V Meter Automation, LLC et al. K & V Meter Automation, LLC et al. v. City of Atlanta. Metals & Materials Engineers, LLC v. City of Atlanta. Nos. A11A0769, A11A0770, A11A0771, A11A0772. Court of Appeals of Georgia.

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-15-00454-CV KRISTEN VANDER-PLAS, APPELLANT V. DONALD R. MAY, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 99th District Court Lubbock County, Texas

Opinion issued December 10, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00475-CR ——————————— ANTONIO HOPKINS-MCGEE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A

656 F.Supp.2d 662 (2009) James and Sandra LINDQUIST, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF PASADENA, TEXAS, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-06-1975. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 10, 2009. *667 David Alfred Kahne, Attorney at Law, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs. William Scott Helfand, Charles T. Jer

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED BY SENTINEL ADVISORS, LLC1 WILLIAMS, Judge. This matter comes before the Court on a motion for reconsideration filed by Sentinel Advisors, LLC (Sentinel).2 In the underlying decision, this Court found that spread transactions contributed to a partnership which generated substanti

McCUSKEY, Justice, dissenting. (Filed April 2, 1998) In reaching its opinion, the majority of the Court has disregarded the requirements of Rule 9(b) of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure regarding the pleading of fraud. This action adds credibility to the public perception that this Court does not follow its *176own preceden

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 2000 Session JAMES JOHNSON v. SUMNER REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., d/b/a SUMNER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumner County No. 19023-C Arthur E. McClellan, Judge No. M2000-00248-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 27, 2000 Jam

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 8, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PATRICIA MARIE JENSON1 Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2001-A-308 Steve R. Dozier, Judge No. M2003-02848-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 21, 2005 The appellant, Patricia Marie Jenson,2

No. 96-355 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1997 VICTOR RElCHENBACH d.b.a. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CONSTRUCTION CO., Plaintiff and Respondent, WATCO, INC., a Montana corporation, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, In and for the County of Yellowstone,

BILLY EDWARD ARMSTRONG AND PHOEBE J. ARMSTRONG, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentArmstrong v. Comm'rDocket No. 28738-09.United States Tax Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER • Kenneth M. Hoyt, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is USOR’s amended motion for summary judgment and the defendant, the City of Pasadena’s, cross-motion for summary judgment1. The Court notes that it has issued an omnibus memorandum opinion identifying and discussing undisputed facts and as well, the

OPINION WILLIAMS, Judge. Introduction This tax refund case presents the issue of whether investments of $450,000 which generated over $40 million in tax losses possessed economic substance. In 1999, the Er-vin brothers sold their cable business, netting over $40 million in profit. That same year, each of the three Ervin brothers, through his limited liability corporation (LLC), sim