Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “CHANG v. ABLE C&C CO. LTD.”
Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd.public domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd. ) ASBCA Nos. 61144, 61219, 62738 ) Under Contract No. W91QVN-14-D-0034 et al. ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Yong Eui Song, Esq.
Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 23-1419 Document: 58 Page: 1 Filed: 04/21/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DONGKUK S&C CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2023-1419 ___________________
Szuber C., Ltd. v. Petrashpublic domain
[Cite as Szuber C., Ltd. v. Petrash, 2022-Ohio-2694.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SZUBER C, LTD., : JUDGES: : Hon. Earle E. Wise, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, J.
Sungwoo E&C., Ltd.public domain
Appeals of -- ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS ) ) ' Sungwoo E&C Co., Ltd. ) ASBCA Nos. 61144, 61219 ) Under Contract Nos. W91QVN-14-D-0034 ) W91QVN-12-D-0114 )
P.C. Connection, Inc. v. Synygy Ltd.public domain
EFiled: Jan 07 2021 10:13AM EST Transaction ID 66233469 Case No. 2020-0869-JTL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE P.C. CONNECTION, INC. d/b/a ) CONNECTION, ) ) Plaintiff, )
C.C. v. G.D.public domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 20-FM-0484, 21-FM-0384 & 21-FM-0385 C.C., APPELLANT, v. G.D
Chang Chun Petrochemical Co., Ltd. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION & ORDER CARMAN, Judge: Plaintiff Chang Chun Petrochemical Company Limited (“Plaintiff’ or “CCPC”) contests the final determination by the United States Department of Commerce (“Defendant” or “Commerce”) in the investigation of an antidumping duty order on polyvinyl alcohol (“PVA”) from Taiwan. See Polyvinyl Alcohol f
Middle West Spirits, L.L.C. v. Gemini Vodka, Ltd.public domain
[Cite as Middle West Spirits, L.L.C. v. Gemini Vodka, Ltd., 2021-Ohio-1503.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Middle West Spirits, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 20AP-118 (C.P.C. No. 15CV-4310) v. :
[Cite as Metal Interests, Ltd. v. Interesting Invests., L.L.C., 2019-Ohio-3942.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO METAL INTERESTS, LTD., : APPEAL NO. C-180518 TRIAL NO. A-1701910 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs.
C.B. Fleet Co. v. Aspen Insurance UK Ltd.public domain
743 F.Supp.2d 575 (2010) C.B. FLEET COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITED, and Aspen Underwriting Syndicate 4711 at Lloyd's London, Defendants. Case No. 6:09-cv-00062. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Lynchburg Division. October 15, 2010. *577 John Eric Sorenson, Jr., Edmunds & Williams PC, Willi
Seavitt v. N-Able, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BRIAN SEAVITT, on behalf of himself ) and all other similarly-situated ) stockholders of N-ABLE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0326-JTL ) N-ABLE, INC., ) )
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: This dispute arises between two companies in the secondary market for structured settlement payments: Peachtree and Rapid. 1 These two companies are in the business of identifying individuals who are the beneficiaries of structured settlements, which provide a stream of payments, much like
C.D.C. v. Bethany Stewartpublic domain
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed January 14, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00545-CV C.D.C., Appellant V. BETHANY STEWART, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. C. Springs 300, Ltd.public domain
287 S.W.3d 771 (2009) HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. C. SPRINGS 300, LTD., Appellee. No. 01-06-00065-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). April 16, 2009. *774 Bridget Chapman, James D. Cupples, Williams, Cupples & Chapman, L.L.P., Byron C. Keeling, Ruth Brett Downes, Keeling & Downes, P.C.,
DIXON FINANCIAL SERVICES, LTD. v. Changpublic domain
TERRY JENNINGS, Justice, dissenting in part. The majority errs in holding that an attorney, “based on qualified immunity,” cannot be held liable, as a matter of law, for fraudulently misrepresenting to a stock transfer agent that the attorney’s client, pursuant to an arbitration award, had ownership rights to shares of stock which were, in fact, wholly owned by another. The majority’s holding extends qualified
Texas Department of Transportation v. C-5 Holdings, LLC and Stone Oak Storage Partners, Ltd.public domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-21-00292-CV TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant v. C-5 HOLDINGS, LLC and Stone Oak Storage Partners, Ltd., Ap
in the Interest of A.C., D.C., and L.C., Childrenpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00321-CV ___________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF A.C., D.C., AND L.C., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 231st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 231-460107-09 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Memorandum Opinion b
Busby v. D.C. Cycle Ltd.public domain
292 S.W.3d 546 (2009) Larry BUSBY, Claimant-Respondent, v. D.C. CYCLE LTD., Employer, and Missouri State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Insurer-Appellant. No. SD 29464. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. August 31, 2009. *548 Cara Lee Harris, Springfield, MO, for Appellant. E
Pappas v. Changpublic domain
Filed 3/3/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO HELENA PAPPAS, Plaintiff and Appellant, A159792 v. (San Francisco County CAROLYN CHANG, Super. Ct. No. CGC18571679) Defendant and Respondent. HELENA PAPPAS, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160293 v
Chang v. Biosuccess Biotech Co.public domain
(IN CHAMBERS) RULING RE MOTIONS SUBMITTED BY CHANG AND BIOSUCCESS PARTIES: (1)MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FROM CONSOLIDATED CASE CV13-00310 JAK; OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 205); (2)MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS (Dkt. 240); (3) MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS’ FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS (Dkt. 234); (4) MOT