Cases

LILJEBERG, J. hln this medical malpractice case, plaintiff, Coley Purvis, appeals the trial court’s judgment rendered in favor of defendant, the Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund (“PCF”), dismissing plaintiffs claims against it with prejudice. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On November 5, 2007, Mr. Purvis experienced an onset of acute appendicitis a

828 F.Supp. 1479 (1993) John G. PURVIS and Emma Jo Bartlett, Plaintiffs, v. Paul R. HAMWI, Robert W. Beckett, Sr., and Paul M. Serio, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-F-701. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 9, 1993. *1480 John G. Salmon, Salmon, Godsman & Nicholson, P.C., Englewood, CO, Charles F. McCloskey, Jr., D

05/22/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 14, 2017 Session JANA LEA PURVIS v. DENNIS PATRICK PURVIS, II Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradley County No. V-15-514 Lawrence H. Puckett, Judge No. E2016-02167-COA-R3-CV In thi

05/22/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 14, 2017 Session JANA LEA PURVIS v. DENNIS PATRICK PURVIS, II Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradley County No. V-15-514 Lawrence H. Puckett, Judge No. E2016-02167-COA-R3-CV In thi

Affirmed in part, Reversed and Rendered in part, and Memorandum Opinion filed July 9, 2019. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00132-CV CHARLES WATSON, Appellant v. TIFFANIE L. PURVIS AND AMAD AL-BANNA, Appellees TIFFANIE L. PURVIS, Appellant v.

205 Ga. App. 13 (1992) 421 S.E.2d 303 PURVIS v. VIRGIL BARBER CONTRACTOR, INC. et al. A92A0600. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided June 25, 1992. Reconsideration Denied July 14, 1992. Simpson & Gray, Ralph F. Simpson, Joseph B. Gray, Jr., O'Neal, Brown & Sizemore, Manley F. Brown, Lamar W. Sizemore, Jr., for

ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. In this action, Plaintiff Chris Purvis asserts state and federal causes of action against Defendants City of Atlanta; Fulton County, Georgia; and Fulton County Sheriff Theodore Jackson, in his individual and official capacities (Fulton County and Sheriff Jackson are referred to as the “Fulton County Defendants”), Plaintiff alleges that he was lawfully arr

Donna Gail Purvis Thomas filed a petition in the Chancery Court of Leake County, Honorable G.M. Case, presiding, against Alvin L. Purvis, Sr., et ux., and Alvin L. Purvis, Jr., to modify a final divorce decree wherein she sought permanent custody of two (2) minor children.1 The chancellor, although granting partial relief, dismissed the petition and Mrs. Thomas has appealed. The question presented is whether or not the chancell

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-24-00021-CV ________________ SYDNEY MURPHY, GUYLENE ROBERTSON, RONNIE VINCENT, MILT PURVIS, AND CHARLES THOMAS OVERSTREET, Appellants V. TYLER EPSTEIN, TRUSTEE OF THE ELMWOOD REVOCABLE TRUST,

Plaintiff instituted this action by filing a complaint and summons on 25 April 1973. The case came on for trial on 3 July 1978. *Page 691 At the close of plaintiff's evidence, defendants moved for a directed verdict. The evidence presented by plaintiff, in the light most favorable to him, tends to show the following: For six years prior to 1970, plaintiff leased a restaurant and club in the 5800 block of Glenwood Avenue. When the ownership changed,

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-24-00021-CV ________________ SYDNEY MURPHY, GUYLENE ROBERTSON, RONNIE VINCENT, MILT PURVIS, AND CHARLES THOMAS OVERSTREET, Appellants V. TYLER EPSTEIN, TRUSTEE OF THE ELMWOOD REVOCABLE TRUST,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PITTMAN, Chief Judge. A two-count indictment was filed on June 27, 1977, against the defendants in the shooting death of inmate Louis Wallace in an escape attempt at the Mobile County Jail on October 12, 1976. Count One charged all of the defendants with violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241. Count Two was lodged against only defendant Stanford and it charged criminal

344 F.Supp. 785 (1972) Ralph E. PURVIS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. 4310. United States District Court, W. D. Washington, at Tacoma. April 14, 1972. Ralph E. Purvis, pro se. Stanley G. Pitkin, Seattle, Wash., Charles W. Billinghurst, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., Darrell D. Hallett, Atty., Tax Div., Washington, D. C., for d

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00344-COA CHARLES BOLTON AND LINDA BOLTON APPELLANTS v. JOHN LEE, P.A., THE ESTATE OF JOHN W. APPELLEES LEE, JR., BANCORPSOUTH BANK AND STACEY HALL DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/25/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BARRY W. FORD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: FORREST COUNT

RONEY, Circuit Judge: The defendants were indicted for a conspiracy to deprive the inmates of the Mobile County jail of their rights and privileges as citizens of the United States, which resulted in the shooting death of an inmate during an escape attempt. 18 U.S.C.A. § 241. The district court dismissed the indictment for its failure to allege intent in specific words. The United

FILED 15-0367 5/15/2015 12:14:38 PM tex-5300580 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

COLEMAN, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Luther W. McLain filed suit in 2004 against Illinois Central Railroad. He alleged that Illinois Central’s negligence caused his degenerative back injury. At trial, McLain had improper contact with a juror, committed perjury on the stand, and solicited a witness to commit peijury on the stand to corroborate his story. The trial judge reserved sanctioning McLain until afte

EZELL, Judge. Relator, Golden Nugget Lake Charles, LLC (Golden Nugget), seeks review of the denial of its motion for summary judgment. *830STATEMENT OF THE CASE Plaintiff, Carolyn A. Watts,1 filed a petition against Golden Nugget alleging damages for injuri

MOORE, Judge. D.W. (“the father”), who is undisputedly the biological father of B.W.B. (“the child”), appeals from a judgment on partial findings entered by the Mobile Probate Court (“the probate court”) denying his contest to the adoption of the child by J.W.B. and J.J.B. (“the petitioners”) and from a final judgment of the probate court granting the adoption of the child by.the petitioners. We affirm the judgment on partial

788 A.2d 1112 (2002) PURVIS SYSTEMS, INC. v. AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. No. 99-290-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. January 24, 2002. *1113 Present WILLIAMS, C.J., LEDERBERG, BOURCIER, FLANDERS, and GOLDBERG, JJ. Robert M. Duffy, Christine K. Ahern, Providence, for plaintiff. Charles S. Kirwan, Pawtucket, f