Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “CIAROLLA v. United States”
United States v. Ciarollapublic domain
787 F.2d 584 U.S.v.Ciarolla 85-3348 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. 3/6/86 W.D.Pa., Bloch, J. AFFIRMED
United States v. Ciarolla (John J.)public domain
835 F.2d 285 U.S.v.Ciarolla (John J.) NO. 87-3387 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. NOV 16, 1987 Appeal From: W.D.Pa., Bloch, J. 1 AFFIRMED.
Ciarolla v. Union Railroad Co.public domain
Opinion by Cercone, J., This appeal arises from the lower court’s granting of the defendant-railroad’s motion for a compulsory non-suit in an action for damages brought under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§51-60 (1971) *139(FELA). The plaintiff’s claim for relief rested upon two wholly separate accidents which occurred while plaintif
Welsh, P. v. National Railroad Passenger Corppublic domain
OPINION BY OTT, J.: Paul Welsh, having brought a negligence action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), appeals from the order entered June 11, 2015, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, that granted summary judgment in favor of National Railroad Passenger Corporation a/k/a/ Amtrak (“Amtrak”). Welsh claims the trial court erred
N. Desher (Guardian ad litem of P. Devlin) v. SEPTApublic domain
OPINION BY JUDGE BROBSON Nicole Desher (Appellant), as guardian ad litem of Patrick Devlin (Devlin), appeals two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court). Both orders arise from an action Appellant commenced in the trial court against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), claiming damages under the statute known as the Federal Em
Labes v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.public domain
OPINION BY McCAFFERY, J: ¶ 1 Appellant, David F. Labes, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in refusing to remove the non-suit entered against him at trial. Specifically, we must decide whether Appellant presented adequate evidence of negligence, pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”)1, to permit his case to be decided by a jury. We hold that un
Harding v. Consolidated Rail Corp.public domain
423 Pa. Superior Ct. 208 (1993) 620 A.2d 1185 Charles P. HARDING v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 15, 1992. Filed February 23, 1993. *213 Ralph G. Wellington, Philadelphia, for appellant. Richard D. Gilardi, Pittsburgh, for appellee.