Cases

544 U.S. 408 (2005) PACE v. DiGUGLIELMO, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD, et al. No. 03-9627. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 28, 2005. Decided April 27, 2005. *409 REHNQUIST, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which O'CONNOR, SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ.

OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. The Social Security recipients who brought this putative class action have established previously in this litigation that the Social Security Administration’s policy of withholding benefits for individuals with an outstanding arrest warrant for a violation of probation or parole is invalid. They now move for certification of a class consistin

628 F.3d 1092 (2010) Jimmy Lee BILLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ken CLARK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-17517. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 17, 2010. Filed December 8, 2010. *1093 Marylou Hillberg, Sebastopol, CA, for the petitioner-appellant. Robert Gezi,

PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: Troy Clark, convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death in Texas state court, appeals the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion for relief from the district *773 court’s judgment denying his federal habe-as petition. C

450 F.Supp.2d 396 (2006) Judith CLARK, Petitioner, v. Ada PEREZ, Superintendent Bedford Hills and Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New York, Respondents. No. 05 Civ. 698(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 21, 2006. *397 *398 *399

MEMORANDUM * Gabriel Clark-Aigner appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2255(d), and affirm the dismissal. Clark-Aigner’s acknowledged failure to follow up on a petition he claimed to have sent in 2003 precludes application of the prison mailbox rule, which may deem a document filed at the time a pro se defendant del

981 F.2d 1247 Jones (George)v.Vaughn (Donald), Winder (Randolph), Stachelek (Thomas),Diguglielmo (David), Clark (James), Yanis (Glen), Phillips(Francis), Barone (Mike), Lehman (Joseph D.), Bello(Ernest), Williamson (A. Scott), Henry (Terry W.) NO. 92-1501 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Nov 09, 1992

27 F.3d 557 Jones (George)v.Vaughn (Donald), Winder (Randy), Stachelek (Thomas),Diguglielmo (Dave), Clark (James), Major, Yanis (Glen),Phillips (Francis), Barone (Mike), Lehman (Joe), Bellas(Ernest), Williamson (A. Scott), Henry (Terry W.), allEmployees of Department of Corrections NO. 94-1073 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. May 18,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1425 ERVIN ROLANDO QUIROA-MOTTA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND*, United States Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHANCE BLACKMAN, No. 23-55340 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-02739- v. MEMF-JPR THERESA CISNEROS, OPINION Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for

22-843-cv Doe v. United States United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Submitted: May 16, 2023 Decided: August 1, 2023 No. 22-843 JANE DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JERRY JASON DUDLEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24 - 1300 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan SEED SCHOOL OF WASHINGTON D.C., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jerry Jason Dudley was employed

22-843-cv Doe v. United States United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Submitted: May 16, 2023 Decided: August 1, 2023 Amended: August 4, 2023 No. 22-843 JANE DOE,

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R, COOPER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Christopher Galloway received a poor performance review and a three-day suspension from his job as a bank examiner with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) for submitting *132 inaccurate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VINCENT E. WILSON, : : Plaintiff, : v. : Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-03639 (RCL) : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

21-279-pr Clemente v. Lee 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2022 4 (Argued: September 14, 2022 Decided: July 5, 2023) 5 Docket No. 21-279-pr 6 7 8 VICTOR CLEMENTE, 9 Petitioner-Appellant, 10

MEMORANDUM * Petitioner Cevin Alexander appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We affirm. Alexander filed his petition after the time period of the one-year statute of limitations had passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Adopting the recommendations of the magistr

MEMORANDUM * Anthony Darnell Wafer (Wafer) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus as untimely. 1. Wafer is not entitled to statutory tolling. The California Supreme Court’s citation to In re Clark, 5 Cal.4th 750, 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 509, 855 P.2d 729 (1998) (in bank), reflected the intention to dismiss Wafer’s second and third state ha-be

MEMORANDUM * Petitioner Cevin Alexander appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We affirm. Alexander filed his petition after the time period of the one-year statute of limitations had passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Adopting the recommendations of the magistr

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme *800Court, Kings County (Chun??, J.), rendered January 17, 2007, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. C