Cases

777 F.Supp.2d 1245 (2011) ALABAMA CENTRAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff, v. CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV-11-BE-0470-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. April 8, 2011. *1246 Jeffrey L. Bowling, Bedford Rogers & Bowling PC, Russellville, AL, Stephen D. Heninger, Heninger Garri

983 F.Supp. 787 (1997) CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, INC., Plaintiff, v. Gary A. PETERS, et al., Defendants. No. 97 C 2424. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 18, 1997. *788 *789 *790 Daniel Keenan Ryan, Hinshaw & Culbert

522 F.Supp. 414 (1981) CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, INC. v. GIRARD BANK. Civ. A. No. 80-2038. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. August 31, 1981. As Amended September 8, 1981. *415 *416 S. Gordon Elkins, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., for p

Opinion MALLANO, P. J. Plaintiff, a credit union, processed a fraudulent wire transfer request, sustaining a loss of around $243,700, and sought to recover its loss under a credit union bond issued by defendant, which declined to pay. The credit union filed this action, seeking to recover under the bond for its monetary loss and requesting an award of punitive damages. The trial court grante

Cowin, J. This dispute arose after unauthorized parties obtained access to magnetic stripe data from approximately 9.2 million credit cards4 used by cardholders to purchase merchandise at stores of the defendant BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (BJ’s). Using the stolen data, the thieves were able to engage in fraudulent credit card transactions worth millions of dollars. The plaintiff credit unions, which h

Quinlan, Regina L., J. INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs, CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc. (“CUMIS”) and 192 separate credit unions (“the credit unions”), seek damages against the defendants, BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (“BJ’s Wholesale”) and Fifth Third BankCorp (“Fifth Third”), for breach of contract (counts I and II), fraud (counts III and IV), negligent misrepresentation (counts V and VI), negligence (counts VII an

252 B.R. 739 (2000) In re Leslie WILSON, Debtor. Leslie Wilson, Appellant, v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc., et al., Appellees. No. 00-6069EA. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Eighth Circuit. Submitted August 10, 2000. Decided September 11, 2000. Keith L. Grayson, North Little Rock, AR, for Appellant. Joni M. Vollman, Houst

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST 22, 2005 Session SOUTHERN SECURITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, INC. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-03-0809-3 D. J. Alissandratos, Chancellor No. W2004-02700-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 27, 2005 In this appeal, we are c

CULPEPPER, Judge (concurring in part and dissenting in part and voted for rehearing) . For the reasons assigned in my opinion in the companion case of Jocelyn Ardoin, et al. v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Highways and Cumis Insurance Society, Inc., La.App., 333 So.2d 412, I concur in that part of the majority opinion which finds that Mr. Henry was negl

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6069 EA In re: * * Leslie Wilson, * * Debtor. *

590 F.Supp. 769 (1984) IBM POUGHKEEPSIE EMPLOYEES FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Plaintiff, v. CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, INC. and Professional Asset Management, Inc., Defendants. No. 83 Civ. 5353. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 3, 1984. *770 Quartararo & Quartararo, Poughkeepsie, N.Y., for plaintiff; Jack M. Quartara

In re Smith, Harold J.; Imes, Willard Earl; Cumis Insurance Soc., Inc.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 92-01818; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW95 2111. Denied.

*905 Opinion RICHMAN, J. North Counties Engineering, Inc. (NCE), an engineering company, and Gary Akerstrom, its president (sometimes, collectively, appellants), were sued in 2004 in two lawsuits that sought property damage arising out of the construction of a dam completed in 1999. A

418 So.2d 730 (1982) CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, INC., and Clement J. Hoerner, and Theresa B. Hoerner v. Chrissanthi CHRISTIDIS. Violette Christidis IKONOMIDIS v. CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, INC., and Clement J. Hoerner. Nos. 12913, 12914. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. July 30, 1982. *731 George J. Kambur, N

364 F.Supp.2d 797 (2005) ARMSTRONG CLEANERS, INC. and Forest Richard Armstrong and Betty L. Bell Armstrong d/b/a/ Armstrong Cleaners and Muncie One Hour Cleaners, Plaintiffs, v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, a member of the Erie insurance Group, Defendant. No. 1:03CV1721DFHTAB. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. March 15, 2005.

415 So.2d 574 (1982) Coleman WHITE and Jimmy White, Plaintiffs & Appellants, v. CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, et al., Defendants & Appellees. No. 8639. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. May 26, 1982. *576 William Henry Sanders, Norris Dale Jackson, Jena, for plaintiffs & appellants. Stafford, Stewart &

SUPERIOR COURT WILLIAM I. KOCH; RENEGADE MANAGEMENT, INC.; AND NAUTICUS MARINA, INC. v. MARK CURLEY AND BRIDGE STREET MARINA, LLC Docket: 2384CV02766-BLS2 Dates: June 10, 2025

OPINION AND ORDER RE THE DISCOVERABILITY OF COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN FIRST PACIFIC NETWORKS AND ST. PAUL BRAZIL, United States Magistrate Judge. In late July of this year Atlantic Mutual (Atlantic) filed a motion to compel First Pacific Networks (FPN) to produce several different kinds of documents and information. On September 6, 1995, after considering written and oral submissions from the parties, as wel

*1047ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Plaintiffs Park Townsend, LLC (“Park Townsend”), GKB Development Co., LLC, Warren L. Breslow Trust, and Warren L. Breslow (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this insurance coverage action against Clarendon America Insurance Company (“Clarendon”) and Does 1 through 500 (collectively

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Sierra Pacific Industries’ (“Sierra”) Motion to Dismiss (“MTD”) Defendant/Counterclaimant American States Insurance Company’s (“ASIC”) Second Claim for Relief in its Counterclaim.1 (ECF No. 26.) Also before the Court is