Cases

721 N.E.2d 769 (1999) 308 Ill. App.3d 967 242 Ill.Dec. 490 Richard KOPCZICK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOBART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 3-98-0465. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. November 30, 1999. *772 Michael T. Reagan (argued), Michael C. Jansz, Joel M. Kopp

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an order awarding defendants/appellees costs. That order was entered subsequent to a final order dismissing with prejudice the multi-count complaint of plaintiffs/appellants. An appeal was taken to this court from the order of dismissal. Subsequently, the instant appeal was taken to this court from the costs order. In light of the court’s disposition of the dismissal order in Cunningham v

818 F.Supp. 1226 (1993) Benjamin BRAY, Jr., a minor, by next friend, Sheila BRAY, and Benjamin Bray, Sr., Plaintiffs, v. The HOBART CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION; Eric Witherspoon, Ph.D., in his capacity as Superintendent of the Hobart City School Corporation and Individually; the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative; Patricia Pierce, in her capacity as Director of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative and Individually; Joan Ma

558 So.2d 93 (1990) Elizabeth CUNNINGHAM, Fred N. Harris, James Paul, III, George A. McCoy, Wilma S. Smith, Clifford Brown, Judith Brown, Charles O'Neal, Herman Harris, Hobart G. Creamer, S. Ross Williams, Sr., Nathan P. McLaughlin, Henry Caudill, Jesse D. O'Neal, James E. Lewis, Mary Jane Creamer, Denise Barbara Williams, Joseph N. Hogue, Dinah M. Taylor, Mary Master, and Teresa Cooner, Appellants, v. ANCHOR HOCKING CORPORATION, Formerly Known A

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief. Judge. On November 24, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the 'Complaint in its entirety under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and a motion to strike under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.,-Defendant’s m

292 S.C. 441 (1987) 357 S.E.2d 23 Charles N. CRAVEN and Susan Craven, Appellants v. Elizabeth S. CUNNINGHAM and Sheila C. Cunningham, Respondents. 22734 Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard April 20, 1987. Decided June 1, 1987. John R. Clarke, North Myrtle Beach, for appellants. O. Allen Alexander

872 So.2d 101 (2003) Paul L. SPAIN, as administrator for the estate of Carolyn Watts Spain, deceased v. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION et al. 1000143. Supreme Court of Alabama. June 30, 2003. Rehearing Denied August 29, 2003. *102 M. Clay Ragsdale of Ragsdale & Wheeler, LLC, Birmingham, for plaint

715 F.Supp. 1341 (1989) Evelyn L. MARSHALL v. CIRCLE K CORPORATION. Civ. A. No. 87-1065-B. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. June 22, 1989. *1342 Dan M. Scheuermann, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff. William R. D'Armond, Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond, McCowan & Jarman, Baton Rouge, La., for defendant.

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: On August 28, 1971, M/V PRINCESS KE AH SOM PAH, a shrimp boat, sank in 15 fathoms of water in the Gulf of-Mexico south of Port Aransas, Texas. There was no loss of life or personal injury, but the vessel itself and its gear, including its engines, navigational equipment and rigging, were claimed by the sea. The owners of the PRINCESS, James I. George, Jr., James I. George, III and JIG III Corporation [

Argued October 21, 1936. The plaintiff, under a written contract, dated December 4, 1934, sold to defendant a dough mixer, described therein as a "Hobart Model M-80," together with certain equipment consisting of a bowl, dough arm and beater. The consideration of $978.50 was to be paid in monthly installments. The contract provided, inter alia, as follows: "It is agreed this order shall not be subject to countermand or rescission by vendee, and that it covers all agreements concerning

The bill is to foreclose two mortgages, first, a real estate mortgage in the sum of $250,000, and second, a chattel mortgage in the same amount given as additional security for *Page 569 the mortgage on the realty. The property, consisting of a hotel and its equipment and furnishings, is in the custody of an insolvency receiver appointed by this court in Sparks v. LaReine Hotel Corporation, docket 76 p. 135. Numerous conditional

OPINION OF THE COURT Pigott, J. Samuel Passante, an employee of Agway Consumer Products, Inc., doing business as G & P Fresh Pac, was injured while using a mechanical dock leveler at the company’s warehouse in DeWitt. The dock leveler was manufactured by Rite-Hite Corporation and sold to G & P by Mullen Industrial Handling Corp. The dock leveler at issue here is a mechanical platform designed to prov

702 S.E.2d 851 (2010) FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KEYINGHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC et al. No. S09G1783. Supreme Court of Georgia. October 18, 2010. Reconsideration Denied November 23, 2010. *852 Jeffrey Hobart Schneider, Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilco, P.C., James Bradley McClung, Atlanta, for app

USCA11 Case: 23-11452 Document: 50-1 Date Filed: 06/09/2025 Page: 1 of 55 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-11452 ____________________ DESHAWN GERVIN,

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this

THIGPEN, Judge. Delhaize America, Inc., (“Plaintiff’) filed a tax refund action seeking approximately $10 million in corporate income taxes and penalties from the State of North Carolina. The trial court entered an order on summary judgment upholding the decision of the North Carolina Department of Revenue (“Defendant”) to combine Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s Florida-based subsidiary for purposes of taxation, but invalidating th

[Cite as Peters Family Farm, Inc. v. Sav. Bank, 2011-Ohio-665.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY PETERS FAMILY FARM, INC., : : Plaintiff-Appellant, : Case No. 10CA2 : vs. : Released: January 28, 2011 : THE SAVINGS BANK, : DEC

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WALL, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court are renewed motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgment by all defendants except the Suffolk County defendants,1 and a motion by *569TASER International to strike some of the plaintiffs’ exhibits2. The

Opinion issued April 11, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00249-CV ——————————— OSCAR ORTEGA, ROGGIE LAW, STEVEN MURDOCK, AND DON EGDORF, Appellants V.

Robert P. Ringland, Judge. Before this court is Allstate Insurance Company’s motion to amend admission No. 31.1 On May 3, 1999, defense counsel was served with interrogatories and requests for admissions. Upon being served with these discovery requests, defense counsel admittedly forgot to answer them. This failure to answer the request for admissions was, allegedly, inadvertent. Defense counsel asse