Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “CYNTHIA RENEE POLK”
Polk v. Polkpublic domain
589 So.2d 123 (1991) Erma J. POLK v. LaPlause POLK. No. 90-CA-0684. Supreme Court of Mississippi. November 6, 1991. *124 Leman D. Gandy, Greenwood, for appellant. Sally Barrett, Barrett Law Offices, Lexington, for appellee. Before HAWKINS, P.J., and PITTMAN and BANKS, JJ. PITTMAN, Justice, for the Court:
Mulacek v. ExxonMobil Corp.public domain
Mulacek v ExxonMobil Corp. (2023 NY Slip Op 02829) Mulacek v ExxonMobil Corp. 2023 NY Slip Op 02829 Decided on May 25, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department OING, J. Published by New York State Law Re
Phillips v. Statepublic domain
SALCINES, Judge. Roy Lavon Phillips, II (Phillips), appeals his convictions for trafficking in methamphetamine, use or possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of dextro-propoxyphene, and possession of cannabis. Phillips asserts that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for judgment of acquittal for the possession of cannabis charge. We reverse his conviction for possession of cannabis, but affirm the remainin
Vaden v. Connecticutpublic domain
(2008) Redinno L.S. VADEN, Plaintiff, v. State of CONNECTICUT, Connecticut Dep't of Corrections, Theresa Lantz, Brian Murphy, Walter Ford, Lori Ricks, Robert Gillis, Robin Bourne, James Foley, and John Alves, Defendants. No. 06-cv-71 (JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 30, 2008. Opinion Denying Leave to File and to Re-open July 8, 2008.
United States v. Philip Morris USApublic domain
316 F.Supp.2d 1 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA., f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc. et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A.99-2496(GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 7, 2004. Stephen Dudley Brody, U.S. Department of Justice, Tobacco Litigation Team, Washington, DC, Renee Brooker, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, W
In Re Basspublic domain
227 B.R. 103 (1998) In re Pecolia BASS, Danzerine Patterson, Derrick & Dawnette Purcell, Timothy Jackson, Sr., Jannette Hilton, Ricky & Linda Redrick, Charles Ramsey, Roberto Torre-Arroyo, Michael Peltier, Cherie Kirby, Robert & Marie Daugherty, Anthony & Tanya Early, Terry Terrell, Quintin Harper, Gerald Bowser, Ralph & Paula Ryan, Maggie Green, Melvin & Cynthia Kile, Emily Polk, Keith Underwood, Velma Lyons, Christopher & Ju
People v. Hillpublic domain
803 N.E.2d 138 (2003) 345 Ill. App.3d 620 280 Ill.Dec. 908 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rata HILL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-02-1387. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. December 24, 2003. *140 Michael J. Pelletier, Deputy De
United States v. Philip Morris Inc.public domain
312 F.Supp.2d 27 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 6, 2004. *28 *29 Sharon Yvette Eubanks, Renee Brooker, Stephen Dudley Brody, Daniel K. Crane-Hirsch,
Johnny Coffey v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 26, 2014 JOHNNY COFFEY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 12-CR-503 Carroll L. Ross, Judge No. E2013-01659-CCA-R3-PC - Filed April 23, 2014 The Petitioner, Johnny Coffey, appeals the Bradley County Criminal Court’s denial of post
United States v. Philip Morris Inc.public domain
304 F.Supp.2d 60 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 24, 2004. *61 Sharon Yvette Eubanks, Renee Brooker, Stephen Dudley Brody, J. Patrick Glynn, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for
Johnson v. Glaxo Smith Klinepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BRAMLETTE, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion to remand (docket entry 7). Also pending is defendant Joseph N. Bailey, III, M.D.’s motion to sever (docket entry 5-1) and to change venue (docket entry 5-2), which is not properly before the Court at this time. Having carefully considered the plaintiffs motion, the response, briefs,
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign
Pollard v. Alpha Technicalpublic domain
CHARLES R. JONES, Judge. |, This matter is before the Court pursuant to an order of remand by the Supreme Court dated November 5, 2010. The order directs this Court to reconsider the merits of these1 writ applications in view of the district court’s May 26, 2010 order granting approval of a settlement class. After a review of the issues herein, we reverse and remand with instructions.
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KESSLER, District Judge. Defendants have filed an Emergency Motion to Prohibit Plaintiffs Untimely Addition of 650 New Racketeering Acts to the Case (“Emergency Motion”).1 Upon consideration of the Motion, the Government’s Opposition, the Reply, and the entire record herein, the Court concludes that the Motion should be granted in part and denied in
Vanover v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
632 F.Supp. 1095 (1986) Kelly Renee VANOVER and Tara Dale Vanover, by Next Friend and Natural Mother, Kelly Renee Vanover, Plaintiffs, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant. No. S85-138C(D). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Southeastern Division. March 28, 1986. Donald Rhodes, Bloomfield, Mo., for plaintiffs. Steve Sander, Shepherd, Sand
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
337 F.Supp.2d 15 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc. et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 8, 2004. As Amended August 10, 2004. *16 David Charles Shonka, Federal Trade Commission, Office of G
In re Suspensions of Att'yspublic domain
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
618 F.Supp.2d 96 (2009) In re: NEURONTIN MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Bentley v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-11997-PBS. Bulger v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 07-11426-PBS. Dixon v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-11998-PBS. McGee v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-12593-PBS. Owens v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-11017-PBS. Pursey v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 07-10106-PBS. Roberson
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
15‐0690 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2015 4 (Argued: June 8, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2017*) 5
In Re Ah Robins Co., Inc., Etc.public domain
453 F.Supp. 108 (1978) In re A. H. ROBINS CO., INC., "DALKON SHIELD" IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. No. 211. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. July 7, 1978. As Corrected August 16, 1978. *109 Before JOHN MINOR WISDOM, Chairman, and EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, STANLEY A. WEIGEL, AN