Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cain v. Stephens”
Stephens v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Stephens v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Stephens v. Kingpublic domain
PETERS, J. hOne of the defendants in this litigation, Safeway Insurance Co. of Louisiana (Safeway), appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding the plaintiff, Crystal Stephens, $12,000.00 in general damages and $5,500.00 in medical expenses against it and Mary J. King.1 For the following reasons, we reverse that portion of the trial court judgment awarding Ms. Stephens damages against Safeway a
Cain v. Kirschpublic domain
PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Jackson v. Computer Sci Raytheon, 36 So.3d 754, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (stating that court lacks certiorari jurisdiction where irreparable harm is not established). MARSTILLER, RAY and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
Geiger v. Cainpublic domain
540 F.3d 303 (2008) Kelly GEIGER, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Burl CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant. No. 06-31296. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 6, 2008. *305 Kelly Geiger, Angola, LA, pro se. David Stephen Pipes, New Orleans, LA, for Cain. Before GARWOOD, CLEMENT
Burbank v. Cainpublic domain
535 F.3d 350 (2008) Tony BURBANK, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Burl CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant. No. 07-30813. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 11, 2008. *351 Christopher Albert Aberle (argued), Mandeville, LA, for Petitioner-Appellee. David Stephen Pipes (argued), New Orl
United States v. Cainpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Defendant Sheldon Cain appeals both the district court’s order denying his mo*170tion to suppress evidence and the district court’s categorization at sentencing of Cain’s previous conviction for second-degree assault as a crime of violence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Because the evidence at issue was seized pursuant t
United States v. Cainpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Defendant Sheldon Cain appeals both the district court’s order denying his mo*170tion to suppress evidence and the district court’s categorization at sentencing of Cain’s previous conviction for second-degree assault as a crime of violence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Because the evidence at issue was seized pursuant t
Robinson v. Cainpublic domain
510 F.Supp.2d 399 (2007) Julian ROBINSON v. Burl CAIN, Warden. Civil Action No. 05-6319. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. August 31, 2007. *400 *401 Virginia Laughlin Schlueter, Robin Elise Schulberg, Federal Public Defender, New Orleans, LA, for Julian Robinson. David Step
Cain v. Cainpublic domain
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) CAIN V. CAIN NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). LINDSEY T. CAIN, APPELLEE, V.
In Re Detention of Cainpublic domain
931 N.E.2d 337 (2010) In re DETENTION OF Harry CAIN (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Harry Cain, Respondent-Appellant). No. 5-09-0019. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. June 25, 2010. Thomas E. Doyle, Taylorville, IL, for Appellant. Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of Illinois, Michael A. Scodro, Solicitor General, Michael M. Gli
United States v. Cainpublic domain
440 F.3d 672 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James CAIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-30003. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 15, 2006. Brian Patrick Marcelle (argued), Stephen A. Higginson, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, LA, for U.S. Robert F. Barna
Orman v. Cainpublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Chieno Orman was granted a writ of habeas corpus regarding his conviction of second-degree murder and resulting life sentence without possibility of parole. The district court held that the state had breached its duty under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), to disclose exculpatory evidence
State v. Cainpublic domain
757 A.2d 142 (2000) 360 Md. 205 STATE of Maryland v. Mary Jean CAIN. No. 140, Sept. Term, 1999. Court of Appeals of Maryland. July 28, 2000. *143 Kathryn Grill Graeff, Assistant Attorney General (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner. Mary J. Pizzo
Lennon v. Cainpublic domain
In re Lennon, Dennis Stephen; — Plaintiff; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. J, Nos. 271-079; Denied. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.
Crawford v. Cainpublic domain
Case: 20-61019 Document: 253-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 20-61019 FILED ____________
OPINION NAJAM, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE The Cain Family Farm, L.P. (“the Limited Partnership”), and The Cain Family Farm, LLC (“the LLC”) (collectively “Cain Family Farm”), appeal. the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Charles' 0. Drerup and Antlers Ridge, LLC (“Antlers Ridge”) on Cain Family Farm’s complaint seeking to prevent the transfer of real property owned
Crawford v. Cainpublic domain
Case: 20-61019 Document: 00516757458 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Taylor v. Cain & Vaughn Associates, Inc.public domain
145 S.W.3d 899 (2004) Mike TAYLOR, Sr. and Mike Taylor, Jr., d/b/a Sikeston Dry Cleaners and Laundry, Respondents, v. CAIN & VAUGHN ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a H & R Block, Appellants. No. 26136. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. October 14, 2004. *900 King E. Sidwell, Blanton, Rice, Sidwell, Nickell
Dockery v. Cainpublic domain
Case: 20-60086 Document: 00515966547 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/05/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED