Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Calderon v. Miller”
State v. Calderonpublic domain
McGEE, Chief Judge. *126Jesus Calderon ("Defendant Calderon") and Christopher Lashon Miller, Jr. ("Defendant Miller") (collectively "Defendants") appeal from judgments entered upon jury verdicts finding Defendants each guilty of four counts of robbery with a firearm and two counts of attempted robbery with a firearm, and finding Defendant Cald
People v. Calderonpublic domain
People v Calderon (2017 NY Slip Op 00479) People v Calderon 2017 NY Slip Op 00479 Decided on January 25, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance Companypublic domain
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Senior Judge DAVIS concurred. TRAXLER, Chief Judge: Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company (together, “GEICO”) appeal a district court order granting judgment against them in an action a
Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance Copublic domain
Appeals dismissed by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Senior Judge DAVIS concurred. TRAXLER, Chief Judge: Government Employees Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company (together, “GEICO”) appeal a district court order granting partial summary judgment against them on the issue of liability in an
Bean v. Calderonpublic domain
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I join in most of the Court’s opinion but respectfully dissent from Parts III and V. I agree that Bean did not procedurally default his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, that Bean received effective assistance of counsel at the guilt phase of the trial and that there was sufficient evidence to c
Dow Chemical Co. v. Calderonpublic domain
*829 BERZON, Circuit Judge. The Dow Chemical Company, Shell Oil Company, and Shell Chemical Company (“the Companies”) sued more than a thousand Nicaraguan citizens (“the Nicaraguans”) in federal district court in California. The Companies seek a declaration that (1) they are not liable for any injuries to
State v. Calderon-Perezpublic domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Bean v. Calderonpublic domain
ORDER HOLLOWS, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction and Summary Respondents in the above-captioned capital habeas proceeding have sought to depose petitioner in connection with allegations that he has made in the verified petition. Petitioner initially objected to the taking of the deposition. However, at hearing, petitioner was willing to withdraw his obj
Calderon-Lopez v. Berryhillpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RICARDO JOSE CALDERON-LOPEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 19-cv-1851 (KBJ) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security, 1 )
Ex Parte: Carlos Calderonpublic domain
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed February 21, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01292-CR EX PARTE CARLOS CALDERON On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5
CALDERON-HERNANDEZpublic domain
Cite as 25 I&N Dec. 885 (BIA 2012) Interim Decision #3763 Matter of Antonio CALDERON-HERNANDEZ, Respondent Decided August 3, 2012 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals An applicant for cancellation of removal seeking to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his or her chi
Calderon Lopez v. Unknown Individualspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02750 (UNA) ) ) UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS SERVICING ) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint (“Compl.”) and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff,! a resident of Washington, D.C., s
Ex Parte Eric Ruben Calderon v. .public domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00396-CR EX PARTE Eric Ruben CALDERON From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas Trial Court No. 11041CR Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding P
Calderon v. Social Security Administrationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NIDIA CALDERON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-494 (RDM) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1553 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. MICHELLE CALDERON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United State
Calderon-Amezquita v. Rivera-Cruzpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1091 YEMAL CALDERÓN-AMÉZQUITA, in his personal capacity and as the sole heir of his late Father Carmelo Calderón-Marrero, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DR. VICTOR RIVERA-CRUZ; DOCTORS' CENTER HOSPITAL BAYAMON, INC.; DR. ANDRÉS ÁVILA-GONZÁLEZ; DR. ANGEL TORRES-SÁNCHEZ; GRUPO DE EMERGENCIAS VRC CSP; DR. CARLOS HERNÁNDEZ-ROMAN; SIMED; PUERTO
In re Calderonpublic domain
Chapter 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ALLOWING TOOLS OF TRADE EXEMPTION Sidney B. Brooks, United States Bankruptcy Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Objection to the Debtor’s Claim of Exemption filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee, Harvey Sender, on October 26, 2012 (Docket # 17) and Debtor’s Response thereto filed November 10, 2012 (Docket #20). Debtor is a brick mason who claime
Calderon v. Sistopublic domain
609 F.Supp.2d 1077 (2009) Javier Lopez CALDERON, aka Mario Garcia Lobato, aka Adolfo Bonilla Mesia, aka Javier Calderon, aka Javier Calderon Rodriguez, Petitioner v. D.K. SISTO, Respondent. Case No. SACV 08-0022-DSF (RC). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 6, 2009. *1079 Heather F. Crawford, CAAGOffice of the A
Perez v. C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge Thirteen construction workers bring this action against a first-tier subcontractor and its owners, C.R. Calderon Construction, Inc. (“CRC”), Carlos R. Calderon and Ana P. Calderon (collectively, the “CRC defendants”), a second-tier subcontractor and its o
State v. Calderon-Apariciopublic domain
242 P.3d 1197 (2010) STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Ruben CALDERON-APARICIO, Appellant. No. 101,299. Supreme Court of Kansas. October 29, 2010. *1201 Randall L. Hodgkinson, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant. Steven J. Obermeier, assistant district attorney, Stephen M. Howe, district attorney, and Steve Six,