Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RYAN S., individually and on behalf No. 22-55761 of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 8:19-cv-01363- JVS-KES v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., a OPINION Delaware corporation; UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation; UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE CO

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, ) Consolidated INC. SECTION 220 LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 2017-0681-TMR MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 16, 2018 Date Decided: February 28, 2018 Nathan A. Cook, GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Jeroen van Kwawegen, Christopher J. Orrico, and David MacIsaac, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP, New

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING EMPLOYER AND PLAN DEFENDANTS’ OMNIBUS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6), AS WELL AS 12(B)(2), (4), AND (5), 20(A) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) [1062] [1070] [1071] [1072] [1075] [1077] [1078] [1080] [1081] [1082] [1083] [1084] [1085] [1086] [1088] [1089] [1090] [1091] [1092]. [1093] [1094] [1095] [1096] [1097] [1098] [1100] [1101] [1105] [1106] [1107] [1108] [1109] [1110]

643 F.Supp.2d 1107 (2009) In re UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED PSLRA LITIGATION. No. 06-CV-1691 (JMR/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. September 4, 2009. Carolyn G. Anderson, Zimmerman Reed, PLLP, Robert C. Moilanen, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie P.A., Minneapolis, MN, Donald J. Enright, Michael G. McLellan, Finkelstein Thompson & Loughran, Washin

ORDER JAMES M. ROSENBAUM, District Judge. Lead plaintiff, California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”), seeks final approval of a proposed class action settlement, as well as an order granting its attorneys’ fees. The Court heard oral argument on March 16, 2009. The settlement is approved. Attorneys’ fees and expenses are awarded as provided herein.

OPINION ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice. This case arises from a certified question from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota regarding the extent to which a court, in deciding whether to approve a proposed settlement of a shareholder derivative action, must defer to the decision of a special litigation committee “SLC” that the derivative action should be settled on specific terms.</

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NVIDIA CORPORATION, § § Defendant Below, § No. 259, 2021 Appellant, § § Court Below – Court of Chancery v. § of the State of Delaware § CITY OF WESTLAND POLICE AND

643 F.Supp.2d 1094 (2009) In re UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED PSLRA LITIGATION. No. 06-CV-1691 (JMR/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. August 11, 2009. *1095 Carolyn G. Anderson, Zimmerman Reed, PLLP, Robert C. Moilanen, Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie P.A., Dylan J. McFarland, Samuel D. Heins, Stacey L. Mills, Heins

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS Re: ECF No. 46 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 46. The Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND For the purpose of deciding this motion, the Court accepts as true the following

STRINE, Chief Justice: *741 This appeal arises from a less-than-summary books and records action brought under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The stockholder and plaintiff below, KT4 Partners LLC, appeals from the Court of Chancery's post-trial order granting in part an

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH PETTRY and GAIL ) FRIEDT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0132-KSJM ) GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) RICHARD C. COLLINS, )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH PETTRY and GAIL ) FRIEDT, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0132-KSJM ) GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) RICHARD C. COLLINS, )

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 100], filed on November 8, 2010. Plaintiffs motion comes in response to this court’s September 22, 2010 order [Docket No. 99] dismissing the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) without prejudice. At th

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION This case is brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (“ERISA”) by Plaintiff Kirk Del’ Prete against Defendants Comcast -Comprehensive Health and Welfare Benefits Plan (the “Plan”), Independence Blue Cro

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERTA ANN K.W. WONG § LEUNG REVOCABLE TRUST U/A § No. 487, 2024 DATED 03/09/2018, § § Court Below—Court of Plaintiff Below, § Chancery of the State of Appellant, § Delaware § v. § C.A. No. 2023-1251 § AMAZON.COM

OPINION SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. I. Introduction and Summary................................................372 II. Background.............................................................374 A. The Alleged Fraud Summarized.......................................374 B. Pre-Settlement Procedural History................................

661 F.Supp.2d 1076 (2009) SPINEDEX PHYSICAL THERAPY USA, INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED HEALTHCARE OF ARIZONA, INC. et al., Defendants. No. CV-08-457-PHX-ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. April 29, 2009. *1080 Joseph A. Creitz, Law Office of Joseph Creitz, Joseph A. Garofolo, Law Office of Joseph A. Garofolo, San

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERTA ANN K.W. WONG ) LEUNG REVOCABLE TRUST U/A ) DATED 03/09/2018, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-1251-BWD ) AMAZON.COM, INC., ) )