Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Callaway Arts & Entertainment, Inc.”
Caesars Entertainment Operating Co. v. BOKF, N.A. (In re Caesars Entertainment Operating Co.)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION A. Benjamin Goldgar, United States Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding is before the court for ruling after an evidentiary hearing on the motion of the debtors — Caesars Entertainment Operating Co., Inc. (“CEOC”) and more than 170 of its subsidiaries — for a preliminary injunction under section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 105(a), to halt four civil actio
FREELANCE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC. v. Sanderspublic domain
280 F.Supp.2d 533 (2003) FREELANCE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC., J.B. Hunt and Pamela Rushing, Individually Plaintiffs v. Harry SANDERS, J.L. Williams, Tommy Southerland, Joe Brooks, and Leroy Brooks in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Supervisors of Lowndes County, Mississippi, and C.B. "Butch" Howard, in His Own Official Capacity as Sheriff of Lowndes County, Mississippi Defendants No. CIV. 3:02CV109-M-B.
Callaway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.public domain
(2008) CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ACUSHNET COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. 06-091-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. November 10, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Callaway Golf Company ("plaintiff') filed this action against Acushnet Company ("defendant") on Februar
Bihm v. Deca Systems, Inc.public domain
PETTIGREW, J. | sThe plaintiffs/defendants-in-reconvention, Timmy Bihm (T. Bihm), Shelly Bihm (S. Bihm), and Bihm Calibration Services, L.L.P. (BCS)(sometimes referred to collectively as the “Bihm parties”) appeal a July 15, 2015 judgment granted in favor of the defendants/plaintiffs-in-reconvention, Deca Systems, Inc. (Deca) and Gerald Callaway (Callaway)(sometimes also referred to as “defendants”), ordering the Bihm parties
Lodge Construction, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the Cited States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-499; 13-800 Filed: January 10, 2022 LODGE CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Michael H. Payne, Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman, Philadelphia, PA, and Edward Parrott, Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, L.L.P., McLean, VA, for Plaintiff. John H. Roberson, Senior Trial Counsel, with whom were Steven Hough, Trial Attorney, Joana Cristei, Trial Attorney, Deborah A. Bynum, Assistant Director, Martin
COFFMAN GRADING CO., INC. v. Forsyth Countypublic domain
695 S.E.2d 310 (2010) COFFMAN GRADING COMPANY, INC. et al. v. FORSYTH COUNTY et al. No. A10A0271. Court of Appeals of Georgia. April 28, 2010. Troutman Sanders, Sean P. Dailey, Atlanta, for Appellant. Jarrard & Davis, Christopher J. Hamilton, Cumming, for Appellee. MIKELL, Judge. Coffman Grading Company, Inc., and Coffman Equipment Leasing,
Linc-Drop, Inc. v. City of Lincolnpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge. The plaintiff, Line-Drop, Inc., is a for-profit corporation that owns and maintains donation drop boxes for secondhand clothing donated to the March of Dimes. In this case, Line-Drop is challenging the constitutionality of a Lincoln, Nebraska municipal ordinance that requires a permit for such boxes, limits the issuance of permits to certain non-profit
W. Sur. Co. v. Pasi of La, Inc.public domain
JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES This matter is before the Court on Western Surety Company's Motion for Preliminary Injunction.1 Defendants PASI of La., Inc.; Professional Application Services, Inc.; PASI Properties, LLC; Mark W. Alexander; Howard K. Lobell; and Sammie G. Lobell oppose the motion. Both sides have submitted evidence and filed proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law
Citizens National Bank of Beaumont v. Callawaypublic domain
597 S.W.2d 465 (1980) CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF BEAUMONT, Appellant, v. W. M. CALLAWAY et al., Appellees. No. 8487. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. March 6, 1980. Rehearing Denied March 27, 1980. Thomas G. King, Beaumont, for appellant. Anthony G. Brocato, Beaumont, for appellees. KEITH, Justice. The question presente
Butamaxtm Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 14, 2011, ButamaxTM Advanced Biofuels LLC (“plaintiff’ or “Buta*363max”) filed suit in this district against Gevo, Inc. (“defendant” or “Gevo”) alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,851,188 (“the '188 patent”). (D.I. 1) The '188 patent d
CNH America LLC v. Kinze Manufacturing, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM LEONARD P. SLEET, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this patent infringement action, plaintiffs CNH America LLC and Blue Leaf I.P., Inc. (collectively, “Case” or “the plaintiffs”) allege that agricultural equipment manufactured by defendant Kinze Manufacturing Inc. (“Kinze”) infringes the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit.1 (D.I. 1.
Calley v. Callawaypublic domain
382 F.Supp. 650 (1974) William L. CALLEY, Jr., Petitioner, v. Howard H. CALLAWAY et al., Respondents. Civ. A. No. 74-7-COL. United States District Court, M. D. Georgia, Columbus Division. September 25, 1974. *651 *652 *653 *654
171 Cal.App.4th 939 (2009) K.C. MULTIMEDIA, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA TECHNOLOGY & OPERATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. H030494. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District. March 3, 2009. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*] *943 Law Offices of Richar
Chemtall, Inc. v. Citi-Chem, Inc.public domain
992 F.Supp. 1390 (1998) CHEMTALL INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. CITI-CHEM, INC. and Calvin M. King, Defendants. PEARL RIVER POLYMERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITI-CHEM, INC. and Calvin M. King, Defendants. Nos. CV 496-218, CV 496-192. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division. January 27, 1998. *1391
Green v. Carr Lowery Glass Co., Inc.public domain
907 A.2d 845 (2006) 170 Md. App. 502 Frederick GREEN v. CARR LOWERY GLASS COMPANY, INC. No. 0990, September Term, 2005. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. September 15, 2006. Joan P. Adelman, Towson, for appellee. David E. Fink, Baltimore, for Appellant. Panel: HOLLANDER, ADKINS, and SHARER, JJ. SHARER, Judge. I
Case: 12-14989 Date Filed: 03/14/2017 Page: 1 of 194 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-14989 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:09-cv-00110-WTH-PRL DAN CARMICHAEL MCCARTHAN,
Universal Amusement Co., Inc. v. Carol Vance King Arts Theatre, Inc. v. George E. McCrea the State of Texaspublic domain
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: This Texas obscenity case has had a long and somewhat unusual history. Originally filed on November 12,1973, in the Northern District of Texas under the caption King Arts Theatre, Inc. v. McCrea, it was subsequently consolidated by the Chief Judge of this Court with other obscenity cases pending before a three-judge court sitting in the South
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.public domain
627 F.Supp.2d 384 (2009) BRACCO DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERSHAM HEALTH, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-6025. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 5, 2009. *396 Arnold B. Calmann, Esq., Saiber LLC, Newark, NJ, Donald L. Rhoads, Esq., Nicholas L. Coch, Esq., Christopher A. Colvin, Esq., Albert
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus Inc.public domain
440 F.Supp.2d 495 (2006) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. RAMBUS INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 3:05CV406. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. July 25, 2006. *496 Brian C. Riopelle, Esquire, Robert M. Tyler, Esquire, McGuire Woods, LLP, Harris D. Butler, Esquire, Charles L. Williams, Esquire,
Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.public domain
593 F.3d 1289 (2010) THERASENSE, INC. (now known as Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.) and Abbott Laboratories, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, and Nova Biomedical Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and Bayer HealthCare LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 2008-1511, 2008-1512, 2008-1513, 2008-1514, 2008-1595. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Janu