Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Campbell v. Villa Montana, Inc.”
United States v. Francisco Villapublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-4297 Doc: 54 Filed: 06/13/2023 Pg: 1 of 21 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4297 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. FRANCISCO ESCAMILLA VILLA, a/k/a William Villa-Escamilla,
Siskind v. Villa Foundation for Education, Inc.public domain
Petitioner, Jay Siskind, individually and as next friend of his minor son Marc, instituted this suit against Respondents, the Villa Foundation for Education, Inc. (Villa), Jeanette Steinbeck, Carman Coco, Scott *Page 435 Slocum, and Edward Beavel. Villa is an Arizona corporation which operates the Villa School in Toltec, Arizona. Steinbeck, Coco, Slocum, and Beavel are employees of the school and are all residents of Arizona. This is an appeal fro
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
Ryoko Ito v. Macro Energy, Inc.public domain
DELA CRUZ, Chief Justice: This consolidated appeal involves several issues arising from the plaintiffs wrongful death suit as personal representative for the heirs of the decedent, Mr. Akinobu Ito. Ito drowned while on a scuba diving trip supervised by the defendants. On the day of his death, Ito signed an “AGREEMENT FOR EXEMPTION FROM OBLIGATION.” The trial court ruled on a pre-trial motion that the release
262 Kan. 635 (1997) 941 P.2d 1321 KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Appellee, v. REIMER & KOGER ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Appellants. No. 76,524. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed June 27, 1997. *637 Robert L. Howard, of Foulston & Siefkin, L.L.P., of Wichita, argued the cause,
BARRETT, Circuit Judge. This appeal from an Order on Contract Issues and from a Judgment on a Special Verdict entered by the District Court is brought by Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (Bell), the defendant below. Rocky Mountain Helicopters, Inc. (Rocky Mountain) and Southeastern Aviation, Inc. (Southeastern), plaintiffs below, cross appeal. This is a diversity action and Texas law, where applicable, controls.
805 F.2d 907 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 86 ROCKY MOUNTAIN HELICOPTERS, INC., Southeastern Aviation(California), Inc., as agent for Underwriters atLloyds, London and Certain InsuranceCompanies, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.BELL HELICOPTERS TEXTRON, A DIVISION OF TEXTRON, INC.Defendant-Appellant.ROCKY MOUNTAIN HELICOPTERS, INC., and Southeastern Aviation(California), Inc., Agent for Underwriters at
Williams v. Plains Tire & Battery Co.public domain
DAVIS, Justice. [¶1] Cindy Williams was injured when she slipped and fell outside a store operated by Plains Tire & Battery, Co. Inc. (Plains) in Evanston, Wyoming. She filed a complaint alleging that Plains was negligent in failing to maintain the area in a reasonably safe condition. Her husband, William Williams, filed a loss of consortium claim. Plains filed a motion for summary judgment, which
Los Angeles Press Club v. Noempublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LOS ANGELES PRESS CLUB; No. 25-5975 NEWSGUILD - COMMUNICATIONS D.C. No. WORKERS OF AMERICA; SEAN 2:25-cv-05563- BECKNER-CARMITCHEL; RYANNE HDV-E MENA; LEXIS-OLIVIER RAY; CHARLES XU; BENJAMIN ADAM CLIMER; ABIGAIL OLMEDA, OP
CML V, LLC v. Baxpublic domain
6 A.3d 238 (2010) CML V, LLC, individually and derivatively on behalf of JetDirect Aviation Holdings, LLC, Plaintiff, v. John BAX, Gregory S. Campbell, Louis Cappelli, Jane Garvey, Steven M. Hankin, Paul M. Harrington, Donald Hebb, Jeffrey P. Kelly, James W. Marley, Robert P. Pinkas, Peter Sinatra, Stephanie Zimmerman, and JetDirect Aviation Holdings, LLC, Defendants, and JetDirect Aviation Holdings, LLC, Nominal Defendant.
State of Texas v. USApublic domain
KING, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Although there are approximately 11.3 million removable aliens in this country today, for the last several years Congress has provided the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with only enough resources to remove approximately 400,000 of those aliens per year-.1 Recognizing DHS’s congressionally granted prosecuto-rial discretion to set removal enfo
809 F.Supp.2d 754 (2011) Nancy KOVACIC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:05CV2746. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 25, 2011. *763 Jay F. Crook, Wickliffe, OH, for Plaintiffs. Steven W. Ritz, Cleveland, OH, for
Andersen v. King Countypublic domain
138 P.3d 963 (2006) Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian; Peter Ilgenfritz and David Shull; Johanna Bender and Sherri Kokx; Janet Helson and Betty Lundquist; David Serkin-Poole and Michael Serkin-Poole; Vegavahini Subramaniam and Vaijayanthimala Nagarajan; Elizabeth Reis and Barbara Steele; and Michelle Esguerra; and Boo Torres De Esguera, Respondents, v. KING COUNTY; Ron Sims, King County Executive; and Dean Logan, King County Director of Recor
In re MSR Resort Golf Course LLCpublic domain
Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION SEAN H. LANE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment by MSR Resort Golf Course LLC, et al. (the “Debtors”) and The Conlon Group Arizona, LLC (“Con-Ion”). (ECF Nos. 1750, 1753 (the “MSR MSJ” and “Conlon MSJ,” respectively)). The parties dispute what, if any, cure amounts are due to Conlon by v
Arizona Feeds v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.public domain
21 Ariz. App. 346 (1974) 519 P.2d 199 ARIZONA FEEDS, an Arizona corporation, Appellant, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee. No. 2 CA-CIV 1491. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. February 27, 1974. Rehearing Denied April 3, 1974. Review Denied April 23, 1974.
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Legal Authorities Supporting the Activities of the National Security Agency Described by the Presidentpublic domain
Legal Authorities Supporting the Activities of the National Security Agency Described by the President The activities described by the President, in which he has authorized the National Security Agency to intercept international communications into or out of the United States of persons linked to al Qaeda or an affiliated terrorist organization are lawful in all respects. The President’s use of his constitutional authority, as supplemented by statute in the Authorization f