Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Campos v. Safety Kleen Systems, Incs”
Campos v. Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DELGADO-HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge. Gerardo Campos, his wife Yadira Veguilla-Rosario, their legal conjugal partnership, and their minor child C.C.V. initiated the instant action under Puerto Rico law against Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.; Makita USA, Inc.; National Rental and Sales, Inc.; and Tool Box, Inc., seeking redress for damages arising out of Campos’ alleged exposure to a chemical
McAdams v. Safety Kleen Systems, Inc.public domain
*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Deluca and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission affirms, with modifications, the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Deluca and enters the following Opinion a
Lieberger v. Walter Co.public domain
SOLOMON, J, Before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed by one of the defendants, Coolspring Stone Supply Inc. The motion alleges that there exist no genuine issues of material fact and that, therefore, the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. After careful consideration of the record, this motion must be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND The
Adult Group Properties, Ltd. v. Imlerpublic domain
505 N.E.2d 459 (1987) ADULT GROUP PROPERTIES, LTD., et al, Appellants (Defendant below), v. Richard IMLER and Mary Ann Imler, Appellees (Plaintiff below). No. 48A02-8604-CV-124. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District. March 24, 1987. Rehearing Denied April 29, 1987. *461 John M. Blevins, Michael C. Ice, And
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Mull v. Colt Co.public domain
EDELSTEIN, District Judge. This is an action arising out of an accident in which plaintiff sustained serious injuries when he was pinned between the rear of his car and the front of a taxicab. Jurisdiction is predicated on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff is a resident of New Jersey and defendants are, with the exception of Ford Motor Company, all residents of New York. Ford Motor Company is a resident of Michigan. The movi