Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cano v. City of New York”
Cano v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge: Plaintiffs Germain Cano, Eric Cephus, Kevin Darnell, Michael Glenn, Deborah Gonzalez, Travis Gordon, Jacqueline Guarino, Keith Jennings, Wesley Jones, Gregory Maugeri, Michael McGhee, Dmitriy Miloslavskiy, Yvonne Ming, Steven Modes, Kerry Scott, Phillip Singleton, Michael Spalango, Raymond Tucker, Nancy Viglione, and Elli Vikki (collectiv
Cano v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge: Plaintiffs bring this action seeking compensatory damages for the allegedly inhumane prison conditions they endured while detained at Brooklyn Central Booking (“BCB”). Plaintiffs spent ten to twenty-four hours at BCB between their arrests and arraignments. During this time, Plaintiffs were allegedly subjected to overcrowding; sleep depriv
Darnell v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: This is a case about unconstitutional conditions of confinement for pretrial detainees. Twenty state pretrial detainees (“the plaintiffs”) 1 arrested on separate dates between July 10, 2011, and July 23, 2013, brought individual § 1983 claims in
Cano v. DPNY, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. Gil Santiago Cano, Hector Hernandez Za-vala, Juan Hernandez Zavala, Omar Hernandez Zavala, Aristeo Basurto, Carlos Rodriguez Herrera, Leonardo Juarez, Saul Isidro, Aboubacar Gouem, and Anatole Yameogo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, bring this action against DPNY, Inc. d/b/a Domino’s Pizza, BMW
United States v. Canopublic domain
494 F.Supp.2d 243 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Nestor CANO, Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 3412(DC), No. 04 Cr. 236(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 12, 2007. *244 *245 Michael J. Garcia, Esq., United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York by Jessica A. Roth,
Jurski v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Jurski v City of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 02783) Jurski v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 02783 Decided on April 27, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4
Nwanji v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Nwanji v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 00501) Nwanji v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 00501 Decided on January 28, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan
Milo v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction.517 II.Facts.:.518 III. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) Judgment on the Pleadings Standard.520 IV. Law.520 A. Statute.•.520 B. Municipal Liability Standard .520 C. False Arrest and F
Matter of Cano v. Busseypublic domain
Matter of Cano v Bussey (2019 NY Slip Op 02086) Matter of Cano v Bussey 2019 NY Slip Op 02086 Decided on March 20, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Masmalaj v. New York City Economic Dev. Corp.public domain
Masmalaj v New York City Economic Dev. Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 05120) Masmalaj v New York City Economic Dev. Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 05120 Decided on September 29, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by Ne
Rojas v. New York City Tr. Auth.public domain
Rojas v New York City Tr. Auth. (2019 NY Slip Op 07430) Rojas v New York City Tr. Auth. 2019 NY Slip Op 07430 Decided on October 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B
Walker ex rel. T.W. v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
DECISION & ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge: Two parents bring this suit against numerous employees of the Administration of Children’s Services (“ACS”), the former ACS Commissioner, and the City of New York. Based on the events surrounding the removal of their two infant children in 2009, the parents, Plaintiffs Junior Walker and Thaera Bullen-Walker,1
Mid-New York Environ. v. Dragon Springspublic domain
24-2451 Mid-New York Environ. v. Dragon Springs In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2024 (Argued: March 20, 2025 Decided: September 16, 2025) Docket No. 24-2451 MID-NEW YORK ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY PROMOTION COMMITTEE, INC.,
United States v. Canopublic domain
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge, United States District Court Presently before the Court are Defendant’s motion to suppress and motion for return of property. The Court held an evidentiary hearing on these matters on October 25, 26 and 31, 2016. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s motions are DENIED. I. FACTUA
Doe v. New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER DEARIE, District Judge. The claims brought by plaintiff, K. Doe, arise from the alleged creation and implementation — by high-ranking members of the New York State government — of a policy to withhold from state prisoners their positive Hepatitis status and deny treatment as a cost-saving measure.' Plaintiff K. Doe alleges that he contracted Hepatitis while incarcerated at various New Y
Sanchez v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered July 21, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the motion of defendant Mystic Transportation, Inc. (Mystic) to preclude plaintiff, pursuant to CPLR 3126 (2), from offering or relying on photographs at trial to prove negligence on the part of Mystic or from introducing evidence as to any claim for special damages against Mystic, unanimously affirmed, without
Cano v. Mid-Valley Oil Co., Inc.public domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, (1) the third-party defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), entered January 12, 2015, which, inter alia, is in favor of the defendant third-party plaintiff Drake Petroleum Company, Inc., and against it in the sum of $1,000,000, (2) the defendants third-party plaintiffs sep
United States v. Aurelio Cano-Florespublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellant Aurelio Cano-Flores appeals from his conviction for conspiring to manufacture and distribute cocaine and marijuana for importation into the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 959, 960, and 963. He raises a number of challenges to his convictio
Bank of New York Mellon v. WMC Mortgage, LLCpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Shirley Werner Kornreich, J. Motion sequence numbers 001 and 002 are consolidated for disposition. Defendants WMC Mortgage, LLC (WMC), J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corporation (JPMMAC), and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMC Bank, and together with JPMMAC, JPMorgan) move, pursuant to CPLR 3211, to dismiss the complaint. Defendants’ motions are granted for the r
United States v. Jesus Canopublic domain
PER CURIAM: Defendant Jesus Cano appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York after a jury trial before Eugene H. Nickerson, J. The jury found Cano guilty of knowingly and intentionally importing cocaine into the United States from Colombia, South America, in