Cases

YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE1 This is a serious and complex products liability action now nearing trial. The Plaintiffs (collectively "Marchan") have sued a variety of defendants. A rough schematic of the relevant corporate relationships between and among the manufacturer (on the right) and the retailer (on the left) follows:

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosa, J.), dated June 22, 2015, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the cause of action alleging breach of contract and denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action, and (2) a judgment of the sa

WILBUR, Justice. [¶ 1.] David and Connie Finneman (Finnemans) (Appeal No. 26490) and Rock Creek Farms (RCF) (Appeal No. 26486), collectively referred to as Appellants, appeal the trial court’s denial of Appellants’ motions pursuant to SDCL 15-6-60(b) *634 (Rule 60(b)). We affirm.

207 B.R. 594 (1997) In re CHI-MAR FOODS, INC., Debtor. THREE "S" FARMS, INC., and Bruce de'Medici, as Chapter 7 Trustee of Chi-Mar Foods, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. PLYMOUTH CAPITAL LTD., Oxford Capital Corporation, Oxford Capital USA, Inc., Victoria Nowakowski, Business & Capital Development, Ltd., and Richard Woods, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 96 B 21560, Adversary No. 96 A 01718. United States Bank

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice. [¶ 1.] Defendants and appellees Ann and Michael Arnoldy (Arnoldys) and the United States of America move to dismiss appeals filed by defendants and appellants Connie and David Finneman (Finnemans) (Appeal No. 26093) and Rock Creek Farms (RCF) (Appeal No. 26092) for failure to serve their notices of appeal on each party in this foreclosure action. The m

SEVERSON, Justice. [¶ 1.] David and Connie Finneman (Finnemans) (Appeal No. 26374) and Rock Creek Farms Partnership (RCF) (Appeal No. 26373), collectively referred to as Appellants, appeal the circuit court’s decision granting Ann Arnoldy (Arnoldy) equitable ownership of the real estate outlined in two contracts for deed. We affirm.

OPINION OF THE COURT Gerald Lebovits, J. Plaintiff brought this no-fault benefits action seeking *759reimbursement for $844.13 for medical services rendered to assignor, Jacques Gladys. Plaintiff submitted to defendant one bill for date of service May 31, 2011. Defendant denied the claim on the basis that the medical provider failed to appear for t

OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. This case arises from the investment of $750,000 by Moross Limited Partnership into the RTM Fund, L.P, a private investment fund. After the RTM Fund lost 90% of its assets due to an unsuccessful strategy of “short-selling” in the securities market, Moross sued the RTM Fund, its general partner, and its investment manager (coll

929 F.Supp. 1125 (1996) SPRAGUE FARMS, INC. and Paxton Farms, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. PROVIDIAN CORPORATION, formerly known as Capital Holding Corporation; Providian Retirement Plan Trust, formerly known as Capital Holding Retirement Plan Trust; Vigortone Ag Products, Inc., and Webel Feeds, Inc., Defendants. No. 96-3017. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. <

[Cite as Freelon v. GRG Farms, Inc., 2024-Ohio-4764.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HURON COUNTY Suzanna Freelon, As a Director of Court of Appeals No. H-23-022 GRG Farms, Inc. and as Successor Trustee of the Homer Ray Roof Trial Court No. CVH 2021 765 Revocable Living Trust Appellee v. GRG Farms, Inc. et al.

Weiss, J. Appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Williams, J.), entered October 20, 1986 in Sullivan County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon. Plaintiff, as successor in interest to E. F. Hutton Credit Corporation, commenced the instant action to recover rentals and late charges purportedly due under an equipment lease ag

J-A13010-23 2023 PA Super 183 THE ESTATE OF ANN JEFFERS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF HOGARTY, THE ANN JEFFERS : PENNSYLVANIA HOGARTY TRUST, SUSAN H. : HARRINGTON, ANN J. KAULL, : MARGARET A. HOGARTY, MICHAEL J. : HOGARTY, TIMOTHY R. HOGARTY : AND MATTHEW P. HARRINGTON :

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 25, 2018 NO. 03-17-00481-CV Republic Capital Group, LLC, Appellant v. Jason Roberts; Eden Farms Ltd.; Ashley & Jason Inc.; Zachary Potts; Northwoods Energy, LLC.; Chanan Corp.; George Atallah; and Saliba Family Trust, Appellees APPEAL FROM THE 20

W4 Farms, Inc. v. Tyson Farms, Inc., 2017 NCBC 62. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION SURRY COUNTY 16 CVS 1112 W4 FARMS, INC.; W4 POULTRY FARMS, LLC; and CHARLES JOEY WHITE, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION ON v. DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL M

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-17-00481-CV Republic Capital Group, LLC, Appellant v. Jason Roberts; Eden Farms Ltd.; Ashley & Jason Inc.; Zachary Potts; Northwoods Energy, LLC; Chanan Corp.; George Atallah; and Saliba Family Trust, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-15-00225

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-3663 ___________________________ John S. Hahn, Special Master Bader Farms, Inc. Plaintiff - Appellee Bill Bader

#28827-aff in pt & rev in pt-SRJ 2020 S.D. 22 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** STROMBERGER FARMS, INC., a Nebraska Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. COREY JOHNSON, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BART STROMBERGER,

64 B.R. 276 (1986) In re GROVES FARMS, INC., Debtor. No. IP85-4392RA S. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. August 19, 1986. James M. Matthews, Baker and Daniels, Indianapolis, Ind., for Production Credit Ass'n. Jon Abels, Dann Pecar Newman Talesnick & Kleiman, Indianapolis, Ind., for Lyons Capital Resources. FINDINGS OF FA

OPINION PER CURIAM: Ayco Farms, Inc. appeals the district court’s order dismissing its complaint under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because we conclude that the district court applied the correct legal rule and that dismissal was appropriate, we affirm. I

ORDER Randy D. Doub, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee (the “Trustee”) on January 7, 2014, the Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment filed by Montague Farms, Inc. (“Montague”) on January 30, 2014, and the Su