Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carbon Health Alpha Medical Group of California, P.C.”
McGill v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-1485V Filed: May 11, 2023 PUBLISHED Special Master Horner BETTINA MCGILL, Pneumococcal conjugate
Davis v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-978V Filed: April 27, 2022 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HARVARD DAVIS, * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, *
Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc.public domain
639 F.3d 11 (2011) Brian K. MILWARD and Linda J. Milward, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 09-2270. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Decided March 22, 2011. Heard December 7, 2010. *13 Steve Baughman Jensen, with whom Allen Stewart,
S. v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-480V (to be published) ************************* E.S, * * Filed: November 13, 2020 Petitioner, * *
Horvath v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-260V Filed: December 20, 2018 To be Published ************************************* S.E.H., * * Petitioner, *
Jung v. Association of American Medical Collegespublic domain
300 F.Supp.2d 119 (2004) Paul JUNG, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.02-0873 PLF. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 11, 2004. *120 *121 *122
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This antitrust case requires us to apply the standards announced in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct.
Barbara Williams v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.public domain
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Barbara Williams appeals the district court’s denials of two motions to remand; grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant-appellees Employers Mutual Casualty Company, Capitol Indemnity Insurance Co., and Owners Insurance Company; and grant of consent judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee The Collier Organization,
David Lynn Jordan v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 3, 2016 Session DAVID LYNN JORDAN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-11-159 Don R. Ash, Senior Judge No. W2015-00698-CCA-R3-PD - Filed October 14, 2016 _____________________________ The petitioner, David Lynn Jordan, appeals the
D.G. v. Secretary of Heath and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 11-577V Filed: May 24, 2019 To be Published ************************* D.G., * * Petitioner, *
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal of a $5 billion punitive damages award arising out of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. This is not a case about befouling the environment. This is a case about commercial fishing. The jury was specifically instructed that it could not award damages for environmental harm. The reason is that under a stipulation with the United States and Alaska, Exxon had already been punished f
270 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir. 2001) IN RE: THE EXXON VALDEZ,GRANT BAKER, ET AL., AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MANDATORY PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLASS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEESv.JOSEPH HAZELWOOD, DEFENDANT,ANDEXXON CORPORATION; EXXON SHIPPING COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTSIN RE: THE EXXON VALDEZ,GRANT BAKER, ET AL., AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MANDATORY PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLASS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,v.EXXON CORPORATION; EXXON SHIPPING CO
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Women Prisoners of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections v. District of Columbiapublic domain
877 F.Supp. 634 (1994) WOMEN PRISONERS OF the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-2052 (JLG). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 13, 1994. *635 *636
Johnson & Johnson v. Fortis Advisors LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHNSON & JOHNSON and § ETHICON, INC., § § Defendants Below, § No. 490, 2024 Appellants, § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware FORTIS ADVISORS LLC, solely in § its capa
Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrisonpublic domain
520 U.S. 564 (1997) CAMPS NEWFOUND/OWATONNA, INC. v. TOWN OF HARRISON et al. No. 94-1988. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 9, 1996. Decided May 19, 1997. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE *565 *566 Stevens, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in
Fortis Advisors LLC v. Johnson & Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FORTIS ADVISORS LLC, solely in ) its capacity as representative of former ) stockholders of Auris Health, Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0881-LWW ) JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, ) INC., ALEX GORS
Cano v. Everest Minerals Corp.public domain
362 F.Supp.2d 814 (2005) Hilaria CANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EVEREST MINERALS CORP., et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A.SA01-CA-610-XR. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. March 28, 2005. *815 Mark A. Hovenkamp, John L. Grayson, Grayson Hovenkamp, Dennis C. Reich, Michael T. Howell, Reich & Binstock, H
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Perrigo Co.public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINAL JUDGMENT BASED THEREON SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE This matter is before the Court for decision on the issues of validity, enforceability, and infringement of three patents owned by Plaintiff Acrux DDS PTY Ltd. (“Acrux”). Plaintiff Eli Lilly Export S.A. is the exclusive worldwide licensee of the patents at issue in this litigation and has licensed its rights
702 F.Supp.2d 181 (2010) ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al., Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 4515. United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 29, 2010. As Amended April 5, 2010. *183 American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, by Christophe