Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHANTAL ATTIAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-cv-882 (CRC) CAREFIRST, INC., et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER In April 2014, hackers gained unauthorized access to the internal computer systems of health insurance company Car

THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ae ) CAREFIRST OF MARYLAND, INC., ) d/b/a CAREFIRST BLUECROSS ) 42-02-2002 BLUESHIELD, U.S. Patent & TMOfe/TM Mail Rept Dt $77 OPPOSER, ) ) v. ) OPPOSITION NO. 116,355 ) oD x FIRSTHEALTH OF ) (Ser. No. 75/455,343) S _. THE CAROLINAS, INC.,, ) = ) _ APPLICANT. ) — - ) >: ) oo OPPOSER’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE Ac . : SUBSTITUTE MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO APPLICANT’S MOTION FOR ~ PARTI

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Feldman’s Medical Center Pharmacy, Inc. (“Feldman’s”) and Pharmacy Management Associates, LLC (“PMA”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) sued CareFirst, Inc. (“CareFirst”) and others (collectively, the “Defendants”)1 in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, alleging intentional interference with economic relation

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. This is an ERISA case. Pursuant to an Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 9, 2011, 823 F.Supp.2d 307 (D.Md.2011), the Court entered judgment in this case on December 5, 2011. Thereafter, plaintiff filed its Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs. (ECF No. 158). Briefing is complete. No hearing is necessar

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Feldman’s Medical Center Pharmacy, Inc. (“Feldman’s”) and Pharmacy Management Associates, LLC (“PMA”) sued Care-First, Inc. (“CareFirst”) and others1 in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, alleging intentional interference with economic relations and other claims. Independence and QCC removed the lawsuit to this Court.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. On June 1, 2009, Plaintiff Feldman’s Medical Center and Pharmacy, Inc. (“FMCP” or “Plaintiff’) sued Defendant CareFirst, Inc. (“CareFirst” or “Defendant”) in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County for $1,588,127.77 plus interest for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and bad faith arising out of CareFirst’

JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: *723A hospital in San Antonio brought various claims against insurance companies and third-party plan administrators for violations of ERISA. The district court dismissed all of the hospital's claims except for the claim for attorneys' fees. Because we hold that the hospital sufficiently pleaded its claim

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Aphena Pharma Solutions-Maryland LLC (“Aphena”) sued BioZone Laboratories, Inc. (“BioZone”), BioZone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“BioZone Pharmaceuticals”), and Daniel Fisher (collectively “defendants”) for contract and fraud claims. Pending are Fisher’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and the defendants’ motion to transfer the case t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) MID-ATLANTIC EQUITY ) CONSORTIUM, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-1407 (PLF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BYRON BREEZE, JR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-753 (JDB) KABILA INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., is a broad and powerful statute aimed at providing a “clear and comprehens

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, District Judge. Pending before the Court are several motions, namely: (1) Defendant Gerald R. Mollohan’s motions to dismiss the complaint [Dockets 5, 13, 20, 26]; (2) Plaintiff Brothers of the Wheel M.C. Executive Council, Inc.’s motion for default judgment [Docket 14] and Defendant’s motion to deny the motion for default judgment [Docket 15]; and (3) Plain

KELLY, Circuit Judge. In 2014, retail grocery stores owried and operated by defendants SuperValu, Inc., AB Acquisition,' LLC,"and New Albert-sons, Inc. suffered two cyber attacks in which their customers’ financial information' was allegedly accessed and stolen. Following the data breaches, customers who shopped at the affected stores brought several -putative’ class actions, which

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-2535 ___________ KENNETH HASSON, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant v. FULLSTORY, INC. ____________ On Appeal from the United Stat

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REED O’CONNOR, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants Blue Cross of California, Anthem Health Plans, Inc., Community Insurance Company, Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc., Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc., and Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.’s (collectively

Arenda L. Wright Allen, United States District Judge In this patent infringement suit, two corporations hailing from distant states find themselves litigating in the Eastern District of Virginia. This sort of forum shopping in patent litigation has proliferated over the past thirty years. See Daniel Klerman & Greg Reilly, Forum Selling , 89 S. CAL. L. REV. 241, 247-48 (2016). This practice has subjected defenda

Islet Scis., Inc. v. Brighthaven Ventures, LLC, 2017 NCBC 17. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 15 CVS 16388 ISLET SCIENCES, INC. ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) OPINION AND ORDER ON

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE OF THE T.T.A.B. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451 Mailed: June 6, 2007 CONSOLIDATED: Opposition No. 91161028 FINANZ ST. HONORE, B.V.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Paula Xinis, United States District Judge Pending is a Motion to Exclude the expert report and testimony of Peter Maga-Ihaes (ECF No. 82) and a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 71) filed by Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants JFJ Toys, Inc. and Fred Ramirez (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). The issues are fully briefed and the Court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6 because no he

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE OF THE T.T.A.B. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451 Mailed: June 6, 2007 CONSOLIDATED: Opposition No. 91161028 FINANZ ST. HONORE, B.V.

T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge Plaintiff, a manufacturer and seller of personal care products for women and men and the owner of the registered trademark VAGISIL, brings this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1071(b) seeking reversal of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision dismissing plaintiff'