Cases

Case: 19-60365 Document: 00515431288 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/28/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-60365 FILED

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Winfred F. Nicholson appeals the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), his complaint in which he challenged the validity of the federal income tax statutes and the Internal Revenue Service’s levies to collect his income tax l

458 F.Supp.2d 249 (2006) Jesse H. NICHOLSON, Jr., Petitioner, v. Thomas CARROLL, Warden, and Carl C. Danberg, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Respondents. No. Civ. 05-732-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. November 1, 2006. *250 Jesse H. Nicholson, Jr., Smyrna, DE, for Petitioner, Pro se. Loren C. M

390 F.Supp.2d 429 (2005) Jesse H. NICHOLSON, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Thomas CARROLL, Carl Hazzard, Bernard Williams, Department of Correction, Anthony J. Rendina, David Pierce, M. Scott, Evelyn Stevenson, John Doe/Jane Doe # 1, and John Doe/Jane Doe # 2, Defendants. No. CIV. 04-954-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. September 30, 2005.

*975 ORDER GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves ■without opposition to vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgments in Fox v. Nicholson, 05-2182, 20 Vet.App. 387, 2005 WL 4044557 (2005), Hash v. Nicholson, 05-1922, 20 Vet.App. 387, 2005 WL 4044552 (2005), Nation v. Nicholson,

596 So.2d 374 (1992) NICHOLSON & LOUP, INC. v. CARL E. WOODWARD, INC., Eustis Engineering Co., Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co., and Larry H. Case. No. 91-CA-1525. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. March 17, 1992. Rehearing Denied April 22, 1992. *377 David J. Hebert, John W. Nicholson, Ma

70 B.R. 398 (1987) In re Gregory Carl NICHOLSON, Sr. Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 86 B 2197 G. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. February 19, 1987. *399 Milnor H. Senior, III, Denver, Colo., for the debtor. Cynthia T. Kennedy and James C. Smittkamp, of Franscona, McClow and Joiner, Boulder, Colo., for Beneficial Mortg. Co. of

In re Nicholson & Loop Inc.; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 91CA-1525; Parish of *1099Jefferson, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 277-123. Denied. CALOGERO, C.J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.

In re Case, Larry H.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 91CA-1525; Parish of Jefferson, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 277-123. Denied. CALOGERO, C.J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.

Application for Reconsideration of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Granted. Execution of district court judgment and the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Fourth circuit rendered on August 8, 1991, is stayed for 30 days in order to allow filing of an application for Certiorari or an appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Any further stay should be sought from the United States Supreme Court.

605 So.2d 1098 (1992) NICHOLSON & LOUP, INC. v. CARL E. WOODWARD, INC., Eustis Engineering Company, Employers Commercial Union Insurance Company and Larry H. Case. No. 92-C-1471. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 4, 1992. Denied. CALOGERO, C.J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.

In re Eustis Engineering Co.; — Defendants); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 91-CW-0179; Parish of Jefferson, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 277-123. Granted. Judgment of May 1, 1991 before a panel of three judges is vacated. Case remanded to the court of appeal to be reargued before a panel of at least five judges. La. Const, art. 5, section

Mikoll, J. P. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. It is undisputed that petitioner suffers from substantial limitation of rotational and lateral movement of his neck and continuing pain. His physician has determined that this disability was caused by an auto accident in which his car overturned on an icy road and plunged down a 30-foot ravine. He was on duty as a Chief Special Investigator at the time. Petitioner sustained a b

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 181.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. NICHOLSON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Nicholson, 2024-Ohio-604.] Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Convictions and death sentences affirmed. (No. 2019-1787—Submitted January 11, 2023—Decided February 22, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, No. CR-18-634069-A.

200 Ga. App. 413 (1991) 408 S.E.2d 487 NICHOLSON v. THE STATE. A91A0761. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided July 11, 1991. Daniel C. B. Levy, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Grover W. Hudgins, Janis C. Gordon, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. SOGNIER, Chief Judge.</

WALTERS, Chief Judge. This appeal involves the question whether there exist certain debts that represent assets of the estate of Kate Nicholson, deceased. Mrs. Nicholson died in 1978. During administration of the Nicholson estate in the magistrate division of the district court, Kathryn Gamble, daughter of the decedent and a residuary devisee of the estate, formally demanded that Carl E. Nicholson, the decedent’s son and per

Debra H. Lehrmann, Justice The holder of the executive right to lease a mineral estate owes non-participating mineral- and royalty-interest owners a duty of utmost good faith and fair dealing. We recently examined the scope of this duty and concluded that, while its parameters "are imprecise, at bottom, the executive is prohibited from engaging in acts of self-dealing that unfairly diminish the value of the non-executive interest

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00357-CR Carl Robert TOLER, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,

JOHNSON, Judge: During the fall of 1973 the Nicholson Company (hereinafter referred to as Nicholson) was the general contractor in the construction of an industrial storage silo at the Ralston Purina plant in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. A problem arose during construction and Nicholson absorbed the costs of the delay. Nicholson alleged that the delay was caused by faulty concrete provided by Pennsy Supply, Inc. (hereinafter r

883 F.2d 69 Nicholson (Carl L.)v.Hall (Frank A.), Hopkins (Arnold J.), Kunkel (William),Devance (William), Packard (Ralph), Tilley (W.),Green (Dave), Hall (J.), Thomson (D.L.),Covington (N.L.), Nichols (H.) NO. 88-6526 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. AUG 14, 1989 1 <