Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 20, 2010 CARL SUTHERLAND v. CHERRY LINDAMOOD ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County No. 02-4390 Stella L. Hargrove, Judge No. M2009-02214-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 17, 2010 An inmate filed suit, claiming that he was discriminated against in job assignments and

310 S.W.3d 310 (2010) Carl S. SUTHERLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 93517. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. May 18, 2010. Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, and NAN

263 F.Supp.2d 1065 (2003) Carl SUTHERLAND v. UNITED STATES LIFE INS. No. Civ.A. 00-2308. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. April 9, 2003. *1066 N. Madro Bandaries and Kenneth Goodwin, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff. Covert Geary and Joseph Piacun, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant. ORDER AND REA

266 S.W.3d 343 (2008) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Carl S. SUTHERLAND, Appellant. No. ED 90622. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. October 21, 2008. *344 Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anna L. Bunch, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

859 S.W.2d 801 (1993) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arlando SUTHERLAND, Appellant. Arlando SUTHERLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. Nos. 57423, 60477. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. July 6, 1993. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied August 9, 1993. Application to Transfer Denie

631 A.2d 354 (1993) ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY, Appellant, v. Vernell M. SUTHERLAND, Appellee. No. 89-CV-777. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 15, 1991. Decided August 26, 1993. *356 Carl D. Liggio, with whom Geoffrey P. Gitner, Richard B. Nettler, Paul J. Ostling, and Elizabeth B. Healy were

fyfrZ-oZ' IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS EX PARTE § § § WR-53,835-05 § CARL MATTHEW BELLOTTI, III § NOTICE m re the "Off Limits" trial Record

I () -I IN TJIE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS I. .. EX PARTE § I § §

944 P.2d 1157 (1997) James Patrick SUTHERLAND, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 96-190. Supreme Court of Wyoming. September 16, 1997. *1158 Sylvia L. Hackl, State Public Defender; Donna Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; Michael Dinnerstein, Director of the Wyoming Defender Aid Program; and Cath

I’Anson, J., delivered the opinion of the court. On the afternoon of June 18, 1963, Linda Sue Sutherland, aged seven, while crossing state highway route 613 in the town of Haysi, Dickenson county, Virginia, was struck and killed by a log truck driven by the defendant, Virgil Dean Sullivan. The father of the child, James L. Sutherland, as administrator of her

261 N.W.2d 346 (1977) CARL H. PETERSON COMPANY, Respondent, v. ZERO ESTATES, et al., Respondents, First National Bank of Lakeville, Appellant. HEDBERG & SONS CO., Respondent, v. Emil J. BRAUN, et al., Defendants, First National Bank of Lakeville, Appellant. Richard L. LUNDAHL, Respondent, v. Emil J. BRAUN, et al., Defendants, First National Bank of Lakeville, Appellant, W. J. Sutherland & Associates

366 F.Supp. 127 (1973) Donald SUTHERLAND and Phyllis Brynjulson Sutherland, Husband and Wife v. AUCH INTER-BOROUGH TRANSIT COMPANY. Civ. A. No. 70-1175. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. November 8, 1973. *128 James E. Beasley, Beasley, Hewson, Casey, Kraft & Colleran, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge. This is an application by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against Sutherland Lumber Company, Inc. The Board found that Sutherland engaged in an 8(a)(1) unfair labor practice (coercive interrogation and threats); 8(a)(3) and (1) unfair labor practices (discharges of Storkman an

STEADMAN, Associate Judge, with whom KING, Associate Judge, joins, dissenting: Prior to today, the law in this jurisdiction relating to the termination of employment of at-will employees was clear and certain. An employer could discharge an at-will employee at any time for any reason or for no reason at all, so long as the reason was not the employee’s refusal to violate the law, Adams v. George W. Cochran

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 6, 2004 Session CARL SHOCKLEY, ET AL. v. JOSEPH F. CROSBY, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Van Buren County No. 1218-C Larry B. Stanley, Jr., Judge No. M2003-00794-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 21, 2004 This appeal arises from a claim filed in Van Buren County Circuit

128 Ill. App.3d 415 (1984) 470 N.E.2d 1210 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RANDALL W. SUTHERLAND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-84-0120. Illinois Appellate Court — Fourth District. Opinion filed November 1, 1984. Daniel D. Yuhas and Karen Munoz, both of State Appellate Defender's Office, of Springfield, for appellant.

297 F.Supp. 542 (1967) CROWN MACHINE & TOOL CO., a corporation, Plaintiff, v. K V P-SUTHERLAND PAPER COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant. No. 42224. United States District Court N. D. California. September 26, 1967. Supplemental Decision April 4, 1968. Supplemental Order April 29, 1968. *543 Ja

GILLIAM, District Judge. This is an action for infringement of United States Patent No. 2,591,106, issued to Daniel M. Sutherland on April 1, 1952, upon application filed July 24, 1947. The plaintiff, Sutherland Refiner Corporation of Trenton, New Jersey, is exclusive licensee under this patent, held in trust by the individual plaintiffs, Lionel M. Sutherland and Douglas G. Sutherland, for the plaintiff corporation. The trus

*727¶1 — Brenda and Shurwin Huff filed a malpractice claim against their former attorney, Patrick T. Roach,1 nearly seven years after they discovered he had missed the Oregon statute of limitations in their underlying personal injury claims. Reasoning the legal negligence claim accrued upon discovery and was time barred, the trial court granted summary judgment dismissa

601 F.Supp.2d 262 (2009) C & E SERVICES, INC., and Carl L. Biggs, Plaintiffs, v. ASHLAND INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 03-1857(JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 9, 2009. *265 Daniel Marino, Jay M. McDannell, Sarah Elizabeth Kleven, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Washington, DC, for Plai