Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 24-3013 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARLOS ALBERTO CUEVAS-ALMONTE, Appellant _____________ On Appeal from the District Court of the Virgin Islands (D.C. No. 3:19-cr

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1634 Lower Tribunal No. 19-3865 ________________ Carlos Mesa, et al., Appellants,

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), imposed February 13, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid, as the record fails to establish that he kno

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. We revisit here appellant Carlos Hernandez-Cuevas’s (“Hernandez”) Fourth Amendment claim of malicious prosecution, actionable under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). 1 We first encountered Hernandez’s case when def

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to decide for the first time whether an individual who alleges that the unlawful conduct of law enforcement officers caused him to be held for three months in pretrial detention without probable cause states a Fourth Amendment claim actionable through a Bivens suit.

Order, Supreme *284Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered October 1, 1997, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Saxe, J., without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Rubin, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Andidas, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J. By this CPLR article 78 proceeding petitioners seek to validate for placement on the November 3, 1998 general election ballot a referendum to amend section 1051 of chapter 46 of the New York City Charter (Charter) by requiring the establishment of a voluntary system of campaign finance reform defined as a system which will provide to qualified candidates for the

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about October 23, 1996, which denied petitioners’ application to validate two initiative petitions seeking to place on the November 1996 general election ballot (1) a referendum to amend the City Charter to place a $100 limit on campaign contributions for candidates participating in the voluntary campaign finances reform system and to increase the current matching grants to par

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered July 27, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, denied, upon renewal of an earlier order, defendant Cablevision’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it, and denied the motions between the third parties for summary judgment on their claims for indemnification against each other, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Third

MEMORANDUM *** Imelda Lopez-Cuevas, a native and citizen of Mexico and lawful permanent resident of the United States, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to terminate removal proceedings and finding her removable for participating in alien smuggling. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. R

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge: Joseph Ferris and Mildred Morrison appeal the judgment entered October 30, 1996, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Sterling Johnson, Jr., Judge, denying their request for a preliminary injunction and dismissing their complaint. Appellants had requested that the court issue an injunction ordering the City Clerk and the Board of Elections for the City

Wallach, J., dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would reverse the judgment appealed from in this Election Law special proceeding brought pursuant to sections 16-100 and 16-116 of the Election Law by which respondents have been ordered to place on the ballot for the general election scheduled to be held on November 2, 1993, an initiative seeking to add to the New York City Charter a provision establishing limits of two consecu

*104RESOLUCIÓN Examinada la moción en cumplimiento de orden presen-tada por el Colegio de Abogados, se autoriza la reinstala-ción de Gilberto Cuevas Vélez al ejercicio de la abogacía y la notaría. Se le apercibe de que futuros incumplimientos a la no-taría y sus reglamentos podrán conllevar la separación permanente del ejercicio profesional. Se le aper

118 F.3d 122 Joseph FERRIS and Mildred Morrison, individually and onbehalf of all signers of the initiative petitionsfiled pursuant to Section 40 of the NewYork City Charter, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Carlos CUEVAS, as City Clerk of the City of New York, andthe Board of Elections of the City of New York,Defendants-Appellees. No. 1465, Docket 96-9406. United States Court of

per curiam: El 9 de febrero de 2001 el Sr. Primitivo Maldonado De León presentó una queja, debidamente jura-mentada ante la Secretaría de este Tribunal, contra el abo-gado Gilberto Cuevas Vélez. En ella, en síntesis y en lo pertinente, expuso el quejoso que el referido abogado había sido contratado para otorgar unas escrituras de compra-venta, que éste había recibido una suma del dinero que le correspondía a varios de los otorga

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT Martin Evans, J. Petitioner Allen H. Both (Roth), Secretary of New Yorkers for Term Limits, Inc., moves pursuant to sections 16-100 and 16-116 of the Election Law and section 37 (5) of the Municipal Home Rule Law, to have this court (i) declare valid, proper and legally effective the initiative petitions filed with the respondent Carlos Cuevas, City Clerk of the City of New York (City

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the *794opinion by Justice Martin Evans at Supreme Court (158 Misc 2d 238). Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa, Smith and Levine.

By this article 78 proceeding petitioners, sponsors of a referendum petition which would place on the ballot a proposed local law amending New York City Charter, chapter 409, § 1100 et seq., to provide for the recall of elected officials and the election of their successors, seek to compel the Clerk of the City of New York to certify the initiative and petition so that the referendum may be placed on the ballot in the November 4, 1986 general ele

PER CURIAM. The bankrupt estate of José Méndez-Rosado and his wife, Alejandra Becerra, had few assets. One of the most significant was a malpractice claim against Dr. Karl Horn and Dr. Julio Westerband. On August 26, 1988, attorneys Antonio Concepción and José *459 A. Cuevas-Segarra filed a Motion