Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LAURA O’DELL; HOLLY No. 25-1528 ZIMMERMAN; LAUREN MILLER, D.C. No. individually and on behalf of all 3:22-cv-01151- others similarly situated, CAB-MMP Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. OPINION AYA HE

ACCEPTED 03-14-00737-CV 4701431 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

758 F.Supp. 217 (1991) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 90-466-JRR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 4, 1991. *218 William C. Carpenter, Jr., U.S. Atty., and Kent A. Jordan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Wilmington, Del. (Issie L. Jenkins, Acting Re

Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Progressive Express Insurance Company ("Progressive" or "Defendant") submits to this Court a motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment (Doc. 16), on Plaintiff John Michael DeFrenza's ("DeFrenza" or "Plaintiff") single claim that Progressive acted in bad faith in resolving his uninsured motorist insurance claim. DeFrenza was in an accident on Septemb

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Carmen Valdez brings this action to review the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security finding that Valdez is not disabled and thus not eligible for Social Security benefits. The Commissioner moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c).1 Valdez has moved fo

34 Cal.Rptr.3d 579 (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 347 Robert BENNETT, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent. No. B175005. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two. September 21, 2005. *581 Kiesel, Boucher & Larson, Raymond P. Boucher,

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Stage Setting Paul Marino is a fraudster extraordinaire. Back in the early 2000s, for example, he ran a fairly elaborate scheme designed to swindle New Yorkers out of their property. In one instance Marino forged the rightful owners’ signatures on documents so he could transfer their property (without their consent, obviously) to him

271 F.Supp.2d 980 (2003) Calvin Eugene SALTERS, Petitioner, v. Carmen PALMER, Respondent. No. CIV.A. 02-CV-40218-FL. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 14, 2003. *981 *982 *983 Laura G. Moody, Brenda E. Turner, Michigan Dep

Order JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. Eric A. Addision (“Plaintiff’) has filed a lawsuit alleging race and gender discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., as well as state law claims of wrongful termination in violation of public policy, breach of employment agreement, and negligence/gross negligence against CMH Homes, Inc. (

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER and Judge BROADWATER joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge. These appeals grow out of a 1998 settlement of litigation that many states brought against a group of major tobacco companies. West Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, like all other states participating in the s

Cordy, J. Luis Rivera and Marie LaBranche were shot on the afternoon of May 19, 1998, as they stood in a crowd on a sidewalk in the Dorchester section of Boston. Rivera died from his wounds. Following a jury trial, Ezequiel Arroyo was convicted of murder in the first degree, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, and unlawful possession of a firearm. On appeal, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to support

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline Silbermann, J.), entered on or about August 5, 1993 which, insofar as appealed from, dismissed so much of the action as seeks to modify the custody provisions of the parties’ divorce judgment on the ground of forum non conveniens, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the *222matter remanded to the Administrative Judge of Supreme Court,

MEMORANDUM DECISION ' AND ORDER B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge INTRODUCTION The Court has before it Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 27) and Defendant’s Motion to Seal (Dkt. 28). The Motions are fully briefed and the Court finds these matters appropriate for decision without oral argument. For the reasons explained below, the Court will GRANT both motions.

290 F.3d 720 Lois STRAWSER; Joyce Perry; James H. Sheppard; Mary Jean Booth; Joyce D. Barker; Betty Jean Gilman; Kathy Robertson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Nancy V. ATKINS, in her capacity as Commissioner of the Bureau of Medical Services, West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources; Darrell W. Peters, in his capacity as supervisor, Third Party Liability Office of Adminis

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1730 Doc: 64 Filed: 08/06/2026 Pg: 1 of 47 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1730 PSEG RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARENTZ FAMILY, LP; BARNEY'S FARM, LLC; HZ PROPERTIES, LLC; M & R,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, DOC. NO. 47 J. Michael Seabright, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Nai Aupuni1 is conducting an election of Native Hawaiian delegates to a proposed convention of Native Hawaiians to discuss, and perhaps to organize, a “Native Hawaiian governing

HULL, Circuit Judge: After a jury trial, eight defendants— seven individuals and one corporation— appeal various aspects of their convictions and sentences in connection with the operation of a complex and sustained scheme of Medicare fraud. To begin, we recount certain evidence regarding the fraud scheme and outline the proceedings before the district court. We then review, with

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT

Filed 5/1/14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA KIMBERLY LOEFFLER et al., ) ) Plaintiffs and Appellants, ) ) S173972 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/3 B199287 TARGET CORPORATION, ) ) Los Angeles County

Asch, J. (dissenting in part). I agree with Justice Kupferman “that the inaction of the PSC in its rule-making capacity affords an insufficient predicate to support a finding” of constitutional violation. As he points out in his opinion, “stricter scrutiny of State involvement will be applied in a case involving racial discrimination in housing like Shelley v Kraemer (334 US 1), cited by Special Term, than in cases only i