Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carol A Rodriguez and Rudolph E. Rodriguez”
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00769-CV Carol Hagerman, Appellant v. Wells Fargo; Rudolph Schwausch; Associates Commercial Corporation; Keith Fiala; Majestic Trucking, Inc.; and Charles Hagerman, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 99-634-C368, HONORABLE BURT
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00769-CV Carol Hagerman, Appellant v.
People v. Rodriguezpublic domain
68 Cal.App.3d 874 (1977) 137 Cal. Rptr. 594 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RUDOLPH RODRIGUEZ, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 29047. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. April 1, 1977. *877 COUNSEL James A. Goldstein, under appointment by the Court of Appeal,
Carol Hottenroth v. Village of Slingerpublic domain
COFFEY, Circuit Judge. Carol Hottenroth sued her employer, the Village of Slinger, Wisconsin (“Sling-er”), asserting various claims of discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The district court, Judge Rudolph T. Randa presiding, consolidated two separate actions filed in federal court by Hottenroth alleging discrimination in her employment and
Hottenroth, Carol v. Village of Slingerpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-2211 CAROL HOTTENROTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF SLINGER, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 27, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01140-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND-DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LARRY
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
State v. McKaguepublic domain
Quinn-Brintnall, J. ¶71 (concurring in part and dissenting in part) — On October 17, 2008, Jay McKague, a homeless man, stole a can of smoked oysters from Kee Ho Chang’s grocery store. When Chang attempted to apprehend McKague in the store’s parking lot, McKague punched Chang, who fell to the ground. As Chang lay on the ground, McKague hit him several times before jumping into a c
Elishah Sawyers, Pax Crate & Freight, Inc. and Robin Sawyers v. Marc Carter and Sally Carterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration statement, which is mailed every two years by the Office of Co
Jocelyn Allen v. the Boeing Companypublic domain
FILED FOR PUBLICATION APR 27 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOCELYN ALLEN; LAWRENCE J. No. 15-35162 ALLEN; VIVIAN LYNN ALLEN; CAREN BARNES; EMERY BLESSING; D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00596-RSM HORACE BLINER; ROBERT A. BLINER; JASON BOGART; BRENDA
United States v. Banco Cafetero Internationalpublic domain
OPINION GOETTEL, District Judge. On March 8, 1985, the United States filed complaints in forfeiture against moneys located in various bank accounts, alleging that the moneys are subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881.1 The Govern*363ment then obtained warrants for arrest of the defendants-in-rem. On March 13,
439 F.Supp. 658 (1977) Willie J. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. FULTON SYLPHON DIVISION, ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. 3-76-197. United States District Court, E. D. Tennessee, N. D. October 31, 1977. *659 Dean Hill Rivkin and Carol S. Nickle, University of Tennessee Legal Clinic, Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiff.
310 F.3d 43 PATROLMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Incorporated for itself and on behalf of its members, Gary Johnson, Police Officer, Missie Lewis-Manning, Police Officer, Robert Drayton, Police Officer, Marva Gardner, Police Officer, Demetria Singleton, Police Officer, Margo McKenzie, Police Officer, Robert Winslow, Police Officer, Kenneth Zepherin, Police Officer, Oscar Espinal, Police Officer, Dave Guevera, Police Officer,
Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
STEIN, District Judge. Defendants appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Shira A. Scheindlin, Judge) upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs. Appellants are the City of New York, former New York City May- or Rudolph Giuliani, former Police Commissioner Howard Safir, and certain other police officials (collectively, “the City”). Appellees are the Patrolmen’s Benevole