Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carol Brisbon”
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brisbonpublic domain
31 A.3d 110 (2011) 422 Md. 625 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Brenda Carol BRISBON. Misc. Docket AG No. 28, September Term, 2010. Court of Appeals of Maryland. October 26, 2011. *112 Glenn M. Grossman, Bar Counsel of Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, for Petitioner. C. Justin
Donna Ellis v. C. R. Bard, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: In this diversity case under Georgia law, plaintiff Donna Ellis alleges that the defendant manufacturers, C.R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”) and Baxter Healthcare Corporation (“Baxter”), are liable for her mother’s brain damage because of their defective labeling and specifically their failure to warn adequately of the danger of having a person other than a doctor or patient
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Farmerpublic domain
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. George L. Farmer, AG No. 41, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Gould, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION The Court indefinitely suspended an attorney who engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, represented clients with a conflict of interest, collected and billed for fees that were unreasonable, and filed a frivolous lawsuit. The attorney’s conduct violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.4 (Communic
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Farmerpublic domain
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. George L. Farmer, AG No. 41, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Gould, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION The Court indefinitely suspended an attorney who engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, represented clients with a conflict of interest, collected and billed for fees that were unreasonable, and filed a frivolous lawsuit. The attorney’s conduct violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.4 (Communic
People v. Westpublic domain
719 N.E.2d 664 (1999) 187 Ill.2d 418 241 Ill.Dec. 535 The PEOPLE of the State of ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. Paul WEST, Appellant. No. 83782. Supreme Court of Illinois. September 23, 1999. *668 Alan M. Freedman, Carol Heise and Gary Prichard, Midwest Center for Justice, Ltd., Chicago, fo
People v. Maxwellpublic domain
JUSTICE HARRISON delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant, Andrew Maxwell, appeals (134 111. 2d R. 651(a)) the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County dismissing without an evidentiary hearing his amended petition for post-conviction relief, brought pursuant to the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 et
People v. Hennonpublic domain
JUSTICE O’CONNOR delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial, defendant Adrian Hennon was convicted, based on accountability, for first degree murder, attempted murder, and armed violence (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, pars. 9 — 1, 8 — 4, 33A — 2, 5 — 1), in the shooting of two individuals. The trial judge sentenced defendant to concurrent prison terms of 40 ye
People v. Brownpublic domain
NO. 4-99-0740 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM M. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.<
People v. Muleropublic domain
680 N.E.2d 1329 (1997) 176 Ill.2d 444 223 Ill.Dec. 893 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Marilyn MULERO, Appellant. No. 78932. Supreme Court of Illinois. May 22, 1997. *1331 Charles M. Schiedel, State Appellate Defender-Sup. Ct. Unit and John J. Hanlon, Asst. State A
Antoine Wilkerson v. Commonwealth of Virginiapublic domain
HUMPHREYS, Judge. Antoine Wilkerson appeals his convictions after a jury trial of first degree murder and robbery, claiming that the trial court erred by 1) refusing to allow Wilkerson to introduce evidence of inconsistent statements made by a Commonwealth witness; 2) allowing the Commonwealth to introduce hearsay statements pertain
People v. Haynespublic domain
737 N.E.2d 169 (2000) 192 Ill.2d 437 249 Ill.Dec. 779 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Jonathan HAYNES, Appellant. Nos. 85180, 85181. Supreme Court of Illinois. July 6, 2000. *173 Alan M. Freedman, Carol R. Heise and Kathy Kelly, all of Chicago, for appellant. <
People v. Pattersonpublic domain
735 N.E.2d 616 (2000) 192 Ill.2d 93 249 Ill.Dec. 12 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Aaron PATTERSON, Appellant. No. 82711. Supreme Court of Illinois. August 10, 2000. *623 G. Flint Taylor, Jr., Timothy R. Lohraff and Joey L. Mogul, of the People's Law Office, of Ch
People v. Brownpublic domain
745 N.E.2d 173 (2001) 319 Ill. App.3d 89 253 Ill.Dec. 399 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William M. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-99-0740. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. March 6, 2001. *176 Daniel D. Yuhas, Deputy Dfr. (court-appointed
People v. Hendersonpublic domain
662 N.E.2d 1287 (1996) 171 Ill.2d 124 215 Ill.Dec. 147 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Demetrius HENDERSON, Appellant. No. 75948. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 25, 1996. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1996. *1291 Alan M. Freedman, Bruce Bornstein a
People v. Findlaypublic domain
177 Ill. App.3d 903 (1988) 532 N.E.2d 1035 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GARY L. FINDLAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-87-0948. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed December 29, 1988. *904 Richard D. Felice, of Wheaton (Ralph J. Gust, Jr., of counsel), for a
People v. Stancielpublic domain
606 N.E.2d 1201 (1992) 153 Ill.2d 218 180 Ill.Dec. 124 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Elijah STANCIEL et al. (Violetta Burgos, Appellee). The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Barbara PETERS, Appellant. Nos. 73097, 73184. Supreme Court of Illinois. November 19, 1992.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Casper, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has filed this lawsuit against Defendants Texas Roadhouse, Inc., Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC and Texas Roadhouse Management Corp. (collectively, “Texas Roadhouse”) alleging a pattern or practice of age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employmen
People v. Pattersonpublic domain
610 N.E.2d 16 (1992) 154 Ill.2d 414 182 Ill.Dec. 592 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Aaron PATTERSON, Appellant. No. 70985. Supreme Court of Illinois. December 4, 1992. Rehearing Denied March 29, 1993. *21 John D. Lien, Joan M. Kubalanza, Foley &am;
People v. Raingepublic domain
570 N.E.2d 431 (1991) 211 Ill. App.3d 432 155 Ill.Dec. 918 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie RAINGE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-87-0951. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. March 14, 1991. Rehearing Denied May 2, 1991.
People v. Kitchenpublic domain
CHIEF JUSTICE BILANDIC delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Cook County, defendant, Ronald Kitchen, was convicted of five counts of murder. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 9 — 1(a)(1).) After finding defendant eligible for the death penalty based on the statutory aggravating factor of m