Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carolyn L. Austin”
Acadian Properties Austin, L.L.C. and Brandon Badeaux v. Carolyn Blakey and CBlakey Investments, L.L.C.public domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-20-00172-CV ________________________ ACADIAN PROPERTIES OF AUSTIN, L.L.C. AND BRANDON BADEAUX, APPELLANTS V. CAROLYN BLAKEY AND CBLA
Austin v. Niblickpublic domain
ORDER Jarren Austin obtained a default judgment in 1995 against John Niblick, a police officer for the City of Fort Wayne, Indiana, who violated his civil rights during an arrest. Austin was unable to collect on the judgment from Niblick. Years later, he asked the district court to enforce the judgment against Fort Wayne, Ni-blick’s former employer, on the theory that local law required the city to indemnify Niblick. The district cour
514 F.Supp.2d 934 (2007) SPECTRUM CREATIONS, L.P., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN KINDER INTERNATIONAL, LLC & The Uttermost Company, Defendants. Civil Action No. SA-05-CV-750-XR. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. April 5, 2007. *935 Mark L. Greenwald, The Law Offices of Mark Louis Greenwald, Robert Loye M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-20-00617-CV Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc., Appellant v. Carolyn Pfeiffer, Appellee FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 20-0527-C368, THE HONORABLE RICK J. KENNON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC, F/K/A Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. v. Carolyn Pfeifferpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-24-00129-CV REAGAN NATIONAL ADVERTISING OF AUSTIN, LLC, F/K/A REAGAN NATIONAL ADVERTISING OF AUSTIN, INC., APPELLANT V. CAROLYN PFEIFFER, APPELLEE On Ap
OPINION ON REHEARING Jane Bland, Justice In this appeal, we determine whether differences in naming conventions nullify notice of an abstract of judgment. A bank obtained a judgment in Mexico and later registered it in Texas state court, using the debtor’s full name, which includes a first and a second surname. The bank then abstracted the authenticated judgment in the county records; the county clerk ind
Carolyn Baker v. Alex Carpiopublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00297-CV Carolyn Baker, Appellant v. Alex Carpio, Appellee FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-21-007702, THE HONORABLE MARIA CANTÚ HEXSEL, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant’
Austin v. Board of Zoning Appealspublic domain
362 S.C. 29 (2004) 606 S.E.2d 209 Carolyn Songer AUSTIN, Appellant, v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, Town of Hilton Head Island, South Carolina; W.J. Enterprises, Inc.; H.D.S. Builders, L.L.C.; Barbara M. Loebig, and National Bank of Commerce, Respondents. No. 3893. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted October 1, 2004. Decided Novemb
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00576-CV Ronald L. Doll and Paradise Cove Marina and Yacht Club, L.L.C./Margaret R. Cain Hurst; Arthur Rhodes; Darrell Hamric, Jr.; The Colonnetta Family Limited Partnership; Preston M. Smith; Carolyn M. Smith; and Henry D. Smith, Appellants v. Margaret R. Cain Hurst; Arthur Rhode
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00576-CV Ronald L. Doll and Paradise Cove Marina and Yacht C
United States v. Carolyn Jacksonpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ Nos. 23-2492, 23-3016, 23-2992, 23-2508 ____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CAROLYN JACKSON Appellant in 23-2492, 23-2992 & JOHN E. JACKSON Appellant in 23-3016, 23-2508
Bellnoa v. City of Austinpublic domain
894 S.W.2d 821 (1995) Jose BELLNOA and Carolyn Bellnoa, Appellants, v. The CITY OF AUSTIN, Appellee. No. 3-94-238-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. January 18, 1995. Motion to Publish Granted March 15, 1995. *822 Anthony Icenogle [Signed Brief], DeLeon & Boggins, P.C., Austin, for appellants. Dian
In Re: Austin L.A.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 8, 2012 IN RE AUSTIN L. A. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Greene County No. 11A044TJW Hon. Thomas J. Wright, Judge No. E2012-00662-COA-R3-PT - Filed January 3, 2013 This appeal concerns a termination o
Carolyn A. Sherman v. Austin State Hospitalpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00296-CV Carolyn A. Sherman, Appellant v. Austin State Hospital, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GN403150, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Carolyn A. Sherman v. Austin State Hospitalpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00296-CV Carolyn A. Sherman, Appellant v.
Seed to Harvest Real Estate, LLC v. Carolyn Turnerpublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-25-00048-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Debra H. Lehrmann, Justice The holder of the executive right to lease a mineral estate owes non-participating mineral- and royalty-interest owners a duty of utmost good faith and fair dealing. We recently examined the scope of this duty and concluded that, while its parameters "are imprecise, at bottom, the executive is prohibited from engaging in acts of self-dealing that unfairly diminish the value of the non-executive interest
Carolyn Barnes v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00631-CV Carolyn Barnes, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 10-663-K368, HONORABLE LLOYD DOUGLAS SHAVER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Carolyn R. Dawson v. Kevin Pakenhampublic domain
Opinion issued October 29, 2019. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00572-CV ——————————— CAROLYN R. DAWSON, Appellant V. KEVIN PAKENHAM, Appellee
DePriest v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P.public domain
351 S.W.3d 168 (2009) 2009 Ark. 547 Louise DePRIEST, Iva Duncan, Gladys Eaton, Carolyn Knight, Geraldine Harris, Bernice Milam, Wanda Hamilton, Eddie Lou Sanders, and Lisa Sanders, Appellants, v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P.; AstraZeneca, PLC; Zeneca, Inc.; and AstraZeneca U.S., Appellees. No. 08-1257. Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 5, 2009.