Cases

718 S.E.2d 377 (2011) Ralph ASHLEY, Jean Ashley, Alexander Augoustides, Carolyn Auman, Luther T. Barber, Sylvia Barber, D.H. Beam, Jay Belk, Pam Belk, Anthony J. Bolo, Jr., Marion J. Bonnom, Keith Bost, Sherry Bost, Ricky Boyd, Michael P. Bralkowski, Rhonda W. Bralkowski, Jim Buchanan, Betsy Buchanan, Peggy Burchett, Jerry Burkhart, Jeri Burkhart, Bobby Byerly, Patsy Byerly, Jim Cameron, Betsy Cameron, Brad Cates, Jodi Cates, Cary Cooper, Amanda Cooper,

122 P.3d 628 (2005) 2005 UT 61 Carolyn Roberts MANNING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Utah, Respondent. No. 20040453. Supreme Court of Utah. September 23, 2005. *630 Mark L. Shurtleff, Att'y Gen., Laura Dupaix, Asst. Att'y Gen., Salt Lake City, for petitioner. Joan C. Watt, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

725 S.E.2d 99 (2012) J. Reed FISHER, June C. Fisher, Robert S. Thomas, Mary Ann S. Thomas, Joseph Henry Jenkins, Jenny Cooke Jenkins, Granby Properties, Inc., Joseph G. Fiveash, Jr., Trustee, Alice Jane Fiveash, Trustee, Calvert T. Lester, Harry Lester, Katherine W. Kittrell, Robert G. Kittrell, Jr., Katherine K. Kerns, Trent S. Kerns, Robert G. Kittrell, III, Meredith F. Kittrell, Dorothy O. Read, J. Lloyd Horton, Carolyn R. Horton, Nancy Foreman Silver

86 P.3d 735 (2004) 2004 UT 14 PROVO CITY CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Sean THOMPSON, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20020307. Supreme Court of Utah. February 13, 2004. *736 Vernon F. Romney, Provo, for plaintiff. Dana M. Facemyer, Provo, for defendant.

704 S.E.2d 529 (2011) Ralph ASHLEY, Jean Ashley, Alexander Augoustides, Carolyn Auman, Luther T. Barber, Sylvia Barber, D.H. Beam, Jay Belk, Pam Belk, Anthony J. Bolo, Jr., Marion J. Bonnom, Keith Bost, Sherry Bost, Ricky Boyd, Michael P. Bralkowski, Rhonda W. Bralkowski, Jim Buchanan, Betsy Buchanan, Peggy Burchett, Jerry Burkhart, Jeri Burkhart, Bobby Byerly, Patsy Byerly, Jim Cameron, Betsy Cameron, Brad Cates, Jodi Cates, Cory Cooper, Amanda Cooper,

This is an appeal by Dr. P.B. Ravi from a judgment for the plaintiff, Carolyn Sue Williams, in a medical malpractice action. We affirm. On April 1, 1985, Carolyn Williams went to Dr. C.H. Paine's medical clinic, complaining of vaginal bleeding and back and pelvic pain. Dr. Paine recommended a hysterectomy. On April 2, 1985, Williams was admitted to D.E. Jackson Memorial Hospital, due to the severity of her pain. Williams signed a consent form authorizing Dr. P.B. Ravi to perfor

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER R. ALLAN EDGAR, District Judge. Plaintiff Timothy Moher (“Moher”) owns 440 acres of land on Sugar Island in Chippewa County, Michigan which he uses to harvest and sell timber. Sugar Island is located on the St. Mary’s River which marks the international boundary between the United States of America and Canada. Moher’s land on Sugar Island is two miles from Canada.

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals are yet another chapter in the ongoing tobacco litigation that began as a class action in Florida courts more than two decades ago and has since swollen the federal docket with thousands of individual cases. Today we are asked to decide the fate of 588 personal injury cases filed on behalf of purportedly living cigarette smoker

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge.1 Jury deliberation is currently underway in the above-captioned case, in which plaintiff Evonne Davis sues defendants Philip Morris USA, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company for injuries that allegedly resulted from defendants’ tortious conduct. The Court presumes familiarity with the expansive record and procedural histor

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

565 S.E.2d 609 (2002) STATE of North Carolina v. John WILLIAMS, Jr. No. 278A99. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 28, 2002. *620 Roy A. Cooper, Attorney General, by William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, and William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. William F.W. Massengale and Marilyn G

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

By Judge Randy I. Bellows Of the several issues now before the Court, the sole issue that is ripe for decision, and the one that therefore shall be decided today, is whether the powers and the authorities of Va. Code § 57-9(A) (hereinafter “§ 57-9(A)”) may be invoked in the instant litigation. That matter requires the resolution of four questions: First, what are the definitions of “ch

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS