Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carolyn Sue Bender”
Bender v. Jordanpublic domain
525 F.Supp.2d 198 (2007) Morton A. BENDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carolyn D. JORDAN, et al., Defendants. Independence Federal Savings Bank, Cross-Plaintiff, v. Carolyn D. Jordan, et al., Cross-Defendants. Civil. Action No. 06-92(RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 6, 2007. *199 Dale A. C
Bender v. Jordanpublic domain
612 F.Supp.2d 62 (2009) Morton A. BENDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carolyn D. JORDAN, et al., Defendants, Independence Federal Savings Bank, Cross Plaintiff, v. Carolyn D. Jordan, et al., Cross Defendants, Carolyn D. Jordan, et al., Third Party Plaintiffs, v. Michael J. Cobb, et al., Third Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-92 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Co
Bender v. Jordanpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) MORTON A. BENDER, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-92 (RMC) ) CAROLYN D. JORDAN, et al. ) )
Bender v. Jordanpublic domain
439 F.Supp.2d 139 (2006) Morton A. BENDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Carolyn D. JORDAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-92(RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 21, 2006. *140 *141 *142 *143
Carolyn Crockett v. The Long Island Railroadpublic domain
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Carolyn Crockett (“Crockett”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Wexler, /.), following a jury verdict, awarding her approximately $25,000 in connection with injuries she sustained while working on a locomotive owned and operated by her employer defendant-appellee Long Isl
Estate of Bender v. Commissionerpublic domain
PARR, Judge:* Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s estate tax liability of $202,673.28.1 The issues for decision are: (1) Whether this Court has jurisdiction to determine decedent’s correct estate tax liability when the determination involves examination of respondent’s offset of a decedent’s income tax liabilities against his income
Rickard v. American National Property & Casualty Co.public domain
J-E01003-17 2017 PA Super 340 CAROLYN RICKARD, ADMINISTRATRIX IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM RICKARD, PENNSYLVANIA DECEASED, Appellant v. AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee No. 774 WDA 2015 Appeal from the Order Entered April 28, 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of
Bell v. Reddingpublic domain
(2008) Kareemah BELL, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn REDDING, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0894(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion to dismiss. The motion will be granted and this action wil
Wells Fargo Bank v. Mowerypublic domain
Kline, Judge. {¶ 1} Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), as trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of February 28, 2001, Series 2001-A, appeals the judgment of the Scioto County Court of Common Pleas. Wells Fargo filed its complaint because of alleged mistakes in two separate transactions. The first mistake occurred during the transfer of real property between Wilma McClurg (“Wi
Jones v. Wiltpublic domain
OPINION BY BENDER, J.: ¶1 Benjamin J. Jones, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Gail B. Jones, Deceased, (Appellant) appeals from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Walter W. Wilt, Esquire (Appellee), in Appellant’s action against Appellee for legal malpractice and breach of contract. For the following reasons, we affirm. ¶ 2 The trial court summarized the facts of this case as fol
Doe v. Brown Univ.public domain
William E. Smith, Chief Judge This case is before the Court on motions from Defendants John Smith (ECF Nos. 40, 41), Phi Kappa Psi, Inc., ("PKP") (ECF Nos. 50, 51), and Brown University ("Brown" or "University") (ECF No. 65), variously attacking Plaintiff Jane Doe's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") (ECF No. 39). After a brief overview of the alleged facts, the Court considers and denies all but part of Brown's Motion for Judgment on
Statoil Oil & Gas LP v. Abaco Energy, LLCpublic domain
Crothers, Justice. [¶ 1] Statoil Oil & Gas LP appeals from judgments dismissing without prejudice its actions against numerous defendants, seeking a determination of the proper distribution of oil and gas revenues from Williams and McKenzie County wells on land adjacent to the Missouri River and under Lake Sakakawea. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the actions because Stato
United States v. Fulcherpublic domain
188 F.Supp.2d 627 (2002) UNITED STATES of America v. Michael FULCHER, Ethel Fulcher, Rosanna Fulcher. No. 7: 98CR00102. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. February 8, 2002. *628 *629 Charles David Whaley, Morchower, Luxton & Whaley, Richmond, VA, for Michael Edw
Goodman v. Statepublic domain
190 S.W.3d 823 (2006) Louis Earl GOODMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-04-413-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. March 30, 2006. *826 Neil Durrance, Denton, for appellant. Bruce Isaacks, Crim. Dist. Atty., Kathleen Walsh, Catherine Luft, Michael Moore and Debra Bender, Asst, Dist. Attys. for Dento
Collins v. Freelandpublic domain
183 S.E.2d 831 (1971) 12 N.C. App. 560 A. D. COLLINS et al. v. Frank FREELAND and wife, et al. No. 7122SC504. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. October 20, 1971. Collier, Harris & Homesley by Richard M. Pearman, Jr., Statesville, for plaintiffs. Pope, McMillan & Bender by Harold J. Bender, Statesville, for defendants.
ORDER ON WFIC’S MOTION TO DISMISS JAMES I. COHN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss [DE 20] (“Motion”) of Westchester Fire Insurance Company (“WFIC”). The Court has reviewed the Motion, Plaintiffs Opposition [DE 29], and WFIC’s Reply [DE 54], and is otherwise advised in the premises. I. BACKGROUND This action ar
Palm v. Paigepublic domain
161 F.Supp.2d 26 (2001) Gary H. PALM, Plaintiff, v. Roderick R. PAIGE, Secretary of Education, Defendant. CIV. A. No. 01-00439(ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 4, 2001. *27 Gary H. Palm, Chicago, IL, pro se. Carolyn A. McKee, Sheila Mae Lieber, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division,
Webber v. Webberpublic domain
308 N.W.2d 548 (1981) John Wallace WEBBER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Carolyn Sue WEBBER, Defendant and Appellee. Civ. No. 9931. Supreme Court of North Dakota. July 15, 1981. Richard B. Thomas, Minot, for plaintiff and appellant. Farhart, Rasmuson, Lian & Maxson, Minot, for defendant and appellee; argued by Gary R. Sorenson, Minot. PEDERSON, Justi
Balyeat Law, P.C. v. Harrisonpublic domain
JUSTICE LEAPHART delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Appellants Jim and Carolyn Harrison (the Harrisons) appeal from the judgment of the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, ordering them to pay medical bills to Respondent Balyeat Law, P.C. (Balyeat). ¶2 We affirm in part and re
Epperson v. Entertainment Express, Inc.public domain
338 F.Supp.2d 328 (2004) Dirk EPPERSON and Betty Schneider, Plaintiffs, v. ENTERTAINMENT EXPRESS, INC., n/k/a Advantix, Inc.; Irvin Richter, Hill International, Inc.; Hill Arts & Entertainment Systems, Inc., n/k/a Haesi Software, Inc.; Defendants. No. 3:99 CV 778(DJS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 24, 2004.