⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Carpenter v. Denning”

Harris v. Denningpublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009-01-29 · Published · cited 1× · 900 N.E.2d 765; 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 125; 2009 WL 200008
900 N.E.2d 765 (2009) Thomas P. HARRIS, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Richard DENNING and Susan K. Carpenter, Appellees-Defendants. No. 46A05-0805-CV-303. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 29, 2009. *766 Thomas P. Harris, Indiana State Prison, Indiana Michigan City, IN, appellant pro se. John H. Daerr, Julia Blackwell Gelinas
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
Alaska Supreme Court · 2007-10-26 · Published · cited 26× · 171 P.3d 41; 2007 WL 3121658
CARPENETI J., concurring. In arguing that the jury was misinstructed on her IIED claim, Karen Carpenter argues that Instruction No. 17 was erroneous because the superior court mistakenly assumed that Carpenter was a "public figure." I agree, and would resolve this issue on that basis. Whether Instruction No. 17 was erroneous depends on whether Carpenter was a public figure. Relying in part
Carpenter v. Daarpublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2023-02-01 · Published · cited 2× · 346 Conn. 80
SHANE J. CARPENTER v. BRADLEY J. DAAR ET AL. (SC 20524) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 52-190a (a)), a complaint sounding in medical malprac- tice must be accompanied by a good faith certificate and ‘‘a written and signed opinion of a similar health care provider, as defined in section
Carpenter v. Daarpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020-08-04 · Published · cited 4× · 199 Conn. App. 367
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019-10-30 · Published · cited 0× · 300 Or. App. 287; 452 P.3d 490
287 Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court September 10, reversed and remanded October 30, 2019 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHANNON DeWAYNE CARPENTER, Defendant-Appellant. Curry County Circuit Court 15CR0052; A159994 452 P3d 490 In State v.
Pavatt v. Carpenterpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019-06-27 · Published · cited 3× · 928 F.3d 906
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner James Pavatt was convicted by an Oklahoma jury of first degree murder and conspiracy to commit first degree murder. Pavatt was sentenced to death for the first degree murder conviction and ten years' imprisonment for the conspiracy conviction. After exhausting his state court remedies, Pavatt filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017-09-13 · Published · cited 1× · 287 Or. App. 720; 404 P.3d 1135; 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 1065
DeVORE, J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for hindering prosecution and possession of a controlled substance, raising two assignments of error. First, defendant challenges the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the state presented insufficient evidence that defendant concealed a person. Second, defendant contends that, because he did not conceal a person, the poli
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2005-05-31 · Published · cited 4× · 165 S.W.3d 141; 2005 Mo. LEXIS 146; 2005 WL 1274443
MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge. Two partners in a real estate venture fell into disagreement resulting in a court-ordered partition sale of their jointly-held property. The only bid at the public sale was made by one of the partners. The trial court, finding the bid to be grossly inadequate, set aside the sale and encouraged the partners to settle. Over two years after the public sale, the bidding partner offered to increase his bid,
In re Carpenterpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016-10-27 · Published · cited 8× · 559 B.R. 551; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 4199; 2016 WL 6310776
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEBTOR’S MOTION TO AVOID JUDI-CIAL LIEN AND CREDITOR’S OBJECTION TO LIEN AVOIDANCE AND HOMESTEAD EX-EMPTION Diane Finkle, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This contested matter is one of first impression in this district as it involves application of the Rhode Island homestead exemption under R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-26-4.1 (“Homestead Exemption”) to the mixed-use residential/commercial property of t
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016-06-06 · Published · cited 17× · 190 F. Supp. 3d 260; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78300; 2016 WL 3351906
VERDICTS AND SPECIAL FINDINGS Robert N. Chatigny, United States District Judge This criminal case is before the Court for decision following a bench trial. Defendant Daniel Carpenter is charged with.devising and executing a scheme to defraud life insurance companies by using misrepresentations to induce them to issue high-value universal life insurance policies to straw insureds,1
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-2914 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSEPH CARPENTER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018-01-09 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION January 9, 2018 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9:10 a.m. v No. 335383 Iosco Circuit
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018-01-09 · Published · cited 5× · 912 N.W.2d 579; 322 Mich. App. 523
Boonstra, J. *525 Defendant pleaded guilty to armed robbery, MCL 750.529, breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a felony or larceny therein, MCL 750.110, and attempted *581 p
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2012-07-19 · Published · cited 2× · 381 S.W.3d 583; 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 5879; 2012 WL 2988795
OPINION TERRY McCALL, Justice. This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a suit arising from the processing of a workers’ compensation claim. We affirm. Background Facts Craig Carpenter suffered an on-the-job injury on November 30, 2007. Liberty Insurance Corporation (Liberty) was the work
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2012-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed July 19, 2012 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-10-00235-CV __________ CRAIG CARPENTER, Appellant V. SOUTHWEST MEDICAL EXAMINATION SERVICES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991-07-24 · Published · cited 13× · 815 P.2d 1275; 108 Or. App. 258; 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1175
815 P.2d 1275 (1991) 108 Or.App. 258 Paulena Elizabeth Carter VERZEANO, Respondent, v. Fred E. CARPENTER and Hazel M. Carpenter, Husband and Wife, Appellants. 88-3358-L-2; CA A63060. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted December 13, 1990. Decided July 24, 1991. Reconsideration Denied October 9, 1991.
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990-05-02 · Published · cited 2× · 791 P.2d 145; 101 Or. App. 489; 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 496
791 P.2d 145 (1990) 101 Or.App. 489 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Brian Keith CARPENTER, Appellant. C88-03-31401; CA A50988. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted March 27, 1990. Decided May 2, 1990. Reconsideration Denied August 1, 1990. Peter Gartlan, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996-06-03 · Published · cited 0× · 938 F. Supp. 521; 77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2514; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8134; 1996 WL 520499
938 F.Supp. 521 (1996) Robert U. CARPENTER, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. No. NA 94-128-C R/H. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division. June 3, 1996. *522 Robert U. Carpenter, Seymour, IN, for Robert U. Carpenter. Shannon L. Hough, Trial Attorney, Tax Division, Washington, DC, f
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2003-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Memorandum Opinion Gary Carpe
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2004-02-19 · Published · cited 0×
11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Order Gary Carpe