Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carpenter v. Denning”
Harris v. Denningpublic domain
900 N.E.2d 765 (2009) Thomas P. HARRIS, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Richard DENNING and Susan K. Carpenter, Appellees-Defendants. No. 46A05-0805-CV-303. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 29, 2009. *766 Thomas P. Harris, Indiana State Prison, Indiana Michigan City, IN, appellant pro se. John H. Daerr, Julia Blackwell Gelinas
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
CARPENETI J., concurring. In arguing that the jury was misinstructed on her IIED claim, Karen Carpenter argues that Instruction No. 17 was erroneous because the superior court mistakenly assumed that Carpenter was a "public figure." I agree, and would resolve this issue on that basis. Whether Instruction No. 17 was erroneous depends on whether Carpenter was a public figure. Relying in part
Carpenter v. Daarpublic domain
SHANE J. CARPENTER v. BRADLEY J. DAAR ET AL. (SC 20524) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 52-190a (a)), a complaint sounding in medical malprac- tice must be accompanied by a good faith certificate and ‘‘a written and signed opinion of a similar health care provider, as defined in section
Carpenter v. Daarpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
287 Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court September 10, reversed and remanded October 30, 2019 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SHANNON DeWAYNE CARPENTER, Defendant-Appellant. Curry County Circuit Court 15CR0052; A159994 452 P3d 490 In State v.
Pavatt v. Carpenterpublic domain
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner James Pavatt was convicted by an Oklahoma jury of first degree murder and conspiracy to commit first degree murder. Pavatt was sentenced to death for the first degree murder conviction and ten years' imprisonment for the conspiracy conviction. After exhausting his state court remedies, Pavatt filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
DeVORE, J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for hindering prosecution and possession of a controlled substance, raising two assignments of error. First, defendant challenges the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the state presented insufficient evidence that defendant concealed a person. Second, defendant contends that, because he did not conceal a person, the poli
MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge. Two partners in a real estate venture fell into disagreement resulting in a court-ordered partition sale of their jointly-held property. The only bid at the public sale was made by one of the partners. The trial court, finding the bid to be grossly inadequate, set aside the sale and encouraged the partners to settle. Over two years after the public sale, the bidding partner offered to increase his bid,
In re Carpenterpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEBTOR’S MOTION TO AVOID JUDI-CIAL LIEN AND CREDITOR’S OBJECTION TO LIEN AVOIDANCE AND HOMESTEAD EX-EMPTION Diane Finkle, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This contested matter is one of first impression in this district as it involves application of the Rhode Island homestead exemption under R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-26-4.1 (“Homestead Exemption”) to the mixed-use residential/commercial property of t
United States v. Carpenterpublic domain
VERDICTS AND SPECIAL FINDINGS Robert N. Chatigny, United States District Judge This criminal case is before the Court for decision following a bench trial. Defendant Daniel Carpenter is charged with.devising and executing a scheme to defraud life insurance companies by using misrepresentations to induce them to issue high-value universal life insurance policies to straw insureds,1
United States v. Joseph Carpenterpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-2914 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSEPH CARPENTER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
People of Michigan v. Chad Michael Carpenterpublic domain
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION January 9, 2018 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9:10 a.m. v No. 335383 Iosco Circuit
People of Michigan v. Chad Michael Carpenterpublic domain
Boonstra, J. *525 Defendant pleaded guilty to armed robbery, MCL 750.529, breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a felony or larceny therein, MCL 750.110, and attempted *581 p
OPINION TERRY McCALL, Justice. This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a suit arising from the processing of a workers’ compensation claim. We affirm. Background Facts Craig Carpenter suffered an on-the-job injury on November 30, 2007. Liberty Insurance Corporation (Liberty) was the work
Opinion filed July 19, 2012 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-10-00235-CV __________ CRAIG CARPENTER, Appellant V. SOUTHWEST MEDICAL EXAMINATION SERVICES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the
Verzeano v. Carpenterpublic domain
815 P.2d 1275 (1991) 108 Or.App. 258 Paulena Elizabeth Carter VERZEANO, Respondent, v. Fred E. CARPENTER and Hazel M. Carpenter, Husband and Wife, Appellants. 88-3358-L-2; CA A63060. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted December 13, 1990. Decided July 24, 1991. Reconsideration Denied October 9, 1991.
State v. Carpenterpublic domain
791 P.2d 145 (1990) 101 Or.App. 489 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Brian Keith CARPENTER, Appellant. C88-03-31401; CA A50988. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted March 27, 1990. Decided May 2, 1990. Reconsideration Denied August 1, 1990. Peter Gartlan, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With
Carpenter v. Internal Revenue Servicepublic domain
938 F.Supp. 521 (1996) Robert U. CARPENTER, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. No. NA 94-128-C R/H. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, New Albany Division. June 3, 1996. *522 Robert U. Carpenter, Seymour, IN, for Robert U. Carpenter. Shannon L. Hough, Trial Attorney, Tax Division, Washington, DC, f
11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Memorandum Opinion Gary Carpe
11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Order Gary Carpe