Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carpenter v. United States”
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-047T (Filed: April 3, 2020) JOHN CARPENTER et al., Keywords: rails-to-trails, easements, Fifth Amendment, Plaintiffs, Vermont, takings, railroad, right-
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Affirmed.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Corrected In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-047L (Filed: April 3, 2020) JOHN CARPENTER et al., Keywords: rails-to-trails, easements, Fifth Amendment, Plaintiffs, Vermont, takings, railroad,
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Summary 6/29/2018 10:04:24 AM Differences exist between documents. New Document: Old Document: 16-402_new 16-402 119 pages (614 KB) 119 pages (614 KB) 6/29/2018 10:04:11 AM 6/29/2018 10:04:10 AM Used to display results. Get started: first change is on page 53. No pages were deleted How to read this report Highlight indicates a change. Deleted indicates deleted content
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel granted, and Harold Gurewitz Esquire, of Detroit, Michigan, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment Takings; Arkansas Law; Property Interest Conveyed; Easements versus Fees; Multi-factor Test; Partial Summary Judgment OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FIRESTONE, Senior Judge. Pending before the court in the above-captioned rails-to-trails case are cross-motions for partial summar
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Carpenter v. United Statespublic domain
492 F.Supp.2d 912 (2007) Malcolm CARPENTER and Jamar Evans, Movants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. Nos. 04 C 7900, 05 C 82. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 22, 2007. *913 *914 *915 Malcolm Carpenter, Atwater, C