Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Carrington Leon Petty”
Petty v. Moores Brook Sanitariumpublic domain
Harrison, J., delivered the opinion of the court. On the 28th day of August, 1902, Harry S. Langhorne, an ■ improvident young man, created a “spendthrift trust” for his own benefit by conveying a valuable estate possessed by him to a trustee upon the following trusts: To secure his then existing indebtedness and certain debts of his mother. After these debts *816
State v. Wootenpublic domain
Levine, J. *1064The state asks us to prevent the disclosure of information that it had redacted from search warrants and warrant applications related to this pending criminal prosecution. We deny the petition and require an unredacted disclosure of the search warrants and applications to the defendant. Due process mandates it.
State v. Wootenpublic domain
Levine, J. *1064The state asks us to prevent the disclosure of information that it had redacted from search warrants and warrant applications related to this pending criminal prosecution. We deny the petition and require an unredacted disclosure of the search warrants and applications to the defendant. Due process mandates it.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. DACOBY RESHARD WOOTEN and THE PALM BEACH POST, Respondents. No. 4D18-2636 [November 28, 2018] Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circu
United States v. James Cobbpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-4172 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES TIMOTHY COBB, Defendant - Appellant. −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WEST VIRGINIA, Am
Potts v. Kel, LLCpublic domain
Potts v. KEL, LLC, 2021 NCBC 72. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION IREDELL COUNTY 16 CVS 2877 W. AVALON POTTS, derivatively on behalf of Steel Tube, Inc., Plaintiff, v. KEL, LLC; RIVES & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Defendants, and ORDER AND OPINION ON
State of Iowa v. Jerry Lynn Burnspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 20–1150 Submitted September 30, 2022—Filed March 31, 2023 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. JERRY LYNN BURNS, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Fae Hoover Grinde, Judge. Jerry Lynn Burns appeals his conviction of first-degree murder. AFFIRMED. May, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Christensen, C.J., and Waterman, M
United States v. John D. Ehrlichmanpublic domain
LEYENTHAL, Circuit Judge, joined by MERHIGE, District Judge, concurring: This supplemental concurring opinion is not meant to derogate from Judge Wilkey’s opinion for the court, in which I join, but is occasioned by the amicus curiae memorandum submitted by the Department of Justice. Because it is not necessary to pass on the contention tendered therein, the court’s opinion prudentially avoids discussion
People v. Winbushpublic domain
Corrigan, J. *415 **1202 Ten days after he was released from the California Youth Authority, defendant Grayland Winbush murdered a young woman in her home during a robbery. The victim was beat
People v. Daltonpublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Liu, J. *176 Defendant Kerry Lyn Dalton was convicted of conspiracy to commit murder and the first degree murder of Irene Melanie May. (Pen. Code former § 182, subd. (a)(1), § 187, subd. (a), former § 189 (all further undesignated statutory references are to this code
State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle Brownpublic domain
APPEL, Justice (dissenting). Under article I, section 8 of the Iowa Constitution, can a police officer use a common minor traffic violation as an after-the-fact pretext to seize a vehicle and its passengers when the actual reason for the stop was constitutionally inadequate? Today's majority says yes. I say NO! I. Summary. History demonstrates that one of the fundamental purpos
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle Brownpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 17–0367 Filed June 28, 2019 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. SCOTTIZE DANYELLE BROWN, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Nathan A. Callahan, District Associate Judge. The defendant challenges her conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated under Iowa Code section 321J.2 (2017), arguing she was subjected to an
Harris v. United Statespublic domain
331 U.S. 145 (1947) HARRIS v. UNITED STATES. No. 34. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 12, 13, 1946. Decided May 5, 1947. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. *146 Herbert K. Hyde and Roy St. Lewis argued the cause, and Mr. Hyde filed a brief, for pe
Davis v. United Statespublic domain
Mr. Justice Douglas delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioner was convicted under an information charging him with unlawfully having in his possession on June 20, 1944,168 gasoline ration coupons, representing 504 gallons of gasoline.1 2The judgment of conviction was sustained *584by the Circ
State v. Novembrinopublic domain
The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J. Since 1961, when the United States Supreme Court decided Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, New Jersey and her sister states have been compelled by the federal constitution to exclude from the State’s case-in-ehief evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment. The so-called “exclusionary
ACCEPTED 14-14-00345-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:02:41 P
Commonwealth v. Chaittpublic domain
380 Pa. 532 (1955) Commonwealth v. Chaitt, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 11, 1955. March 14, 1955. *533 Before STERN, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY and MUSMANNO, JJ. Lemuel B. Schofield, with him John B. Brumbelow, and W. Hensel Brown, for appellant. William C
in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS