Cases

715 So.2d 771 (1998) Lonnie D. CARROLL and Regina Carroll, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY, Defendants-Appellees, et al. No. 31652-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 6, 1998. *772 Dollar, Laird & Scott by John T. Scott, West Monroe, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Davenpo

732 So.2d 1263 (1999) Lonnie D. CARROLL, et al., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 31,652-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. May 5, 1999. *1264 John T. Scott, Counsel for Appellant. Davenport, Files & Kelly, L.L.P. By Carey B. Underwood, Monroe,

420 Pa. Superior Ct. 215 (1992) 616 A.2d 660 Buffie Marie CARROLL, Appellee, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued July 14, 1992. Filed September 30, 1992. Reargument Denied December 4, 1992. Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied February 12, 1993.

In re Carroll, Marie; Carroll, Roger; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-CA-0412; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 334-060. Prior report: La.App., 519 So.2d 265. Denied.

520 So.2d 756 (1988) Marie Carroll, Wife of/and Roger CARROLL v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Nickie Nystrom, and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company. No. 88-C-0360. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 11, 1988. Denied.

519 So.2d 265 (1988) Marie Carroll, Wife of/and Roger CARROLL v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Nickie Nystrom, and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company. No. 87-CA-412. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. January 11, 1988. Writ Denied March 11, 1988. Mollere & Flannagan, Metairie, for plaintiffs/appellees. C. Gordon Johnson, Jr.,

Carroll v Willow Bend Farm LLC (2020 NY Slip Op 00954) Carroll v Willow Bend Farm LLC 2020 NY Slip Op 00954 Decided on February 7, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur

427 So.2d 24 (1983) Thomas F. CARROLL, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 82-463. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 3, 1983. Lunn, Irion, Switzer, Johnson & Salley, Harry A. Johnson, Jr., Shreveport, for defendants-appellants. Charles W. Seaman, Natchitoches, for plaintiffs

AFFIRMED.

419 So.2d 57 (1982) Burnell CARROLL v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. O. D. CARROLL v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. Nos. 14929, 14930. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 17, 1982. *58 Lunn, Irion, Switzer, Johnson & Salley by Harry A. Johnson, Shreveport, for defen

Judgment rendered April 9, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,157-CA No. 56,158-CA (Consolidated Cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT

(2008) Robin PERKINS, Plaintiff v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 3:08-CV-1084. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. December 16, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 46) of defendant State Farm Insurance Company ("State Fa

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge, dissenting. I respectfully, though strongly, dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the district court’s summary judgment order because there is simply no evidence in the record establishing that State Farm acted in bad faith. The majority completely misapplies the Kentucky Supreme Court’s requirement that “[b]efore [a] cause of action [under the U.C.S.P.A.] exists i

ORDER ON APPLICABILITY OF MEDICAL PRIVACY LAWS TO MOTIONS TO QUASH SUBPOENAS BROUGHT BY NON-PARTY LAW FIRMS (DEs 129, 130,133, 138, 139,143,157, 200, 206, 232) JAMES M. HOPKINS, United States Magistrate Judge. THIS CAUSE has come before this Court upon an Order referring discovery matters to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for final disposition. (DE 5). <

MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, JUDGE. A roofing subcontractor sued for allegedly failing to properly tarp and cover a roof during home construction causing property damage from rainwater cannot compel its business liability insurer to defend and indemnify it in the suit for faulty workmanship but may compel coverage if the homeowners’ property damage is an accident. We do not decide the underlying property damage case. Ou

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge, dissenting. I respectfully, though strongly, dissent from the majority’s decision to reverse the district court’s summary judgment order because there is simply no evidence in the record establishing that State Farm acted in bad faith. The majority completely misapplies the Kentucky Supreme Court’s requirement that “[b]efore [a] cause of action [under the U.C.S.P.A.] exists in

In re Watts Water Technologies, Inc.;— Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, No. 122717; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2013 CW 1745. Denied.

630 F.3d 1075 (2011) William Carroll O'NEAL; Doris O'Neal, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 10-1350. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 18, 2010. Filed: January 7, 2011. Matthew W. Lytle, argued, John F. Edgar, John M. Edgar, Michael D. Pospisil, Stephen R. Miller, and John H. Schi

556 F.3d 264 (2009) James H. MOORE, Jr., and Kenneth E. Carroll, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY and State Farm General Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-30313. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 21, 2009. *266 Tom W. Thornhill, Chadwick William Collings (argued),

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Smith v. Orhama, Inc., 907 So.2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). SAWAYA, PALMER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.