⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Carter, Jr. v. Pace Financial, LLC”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 67× · 881 F.3d 75
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 24, 2017 Decided January 31, 2018 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Rehearing En Banc Theodore B. Olson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2019-03-31 · Published · cited 2× · 380 F. Supp. 3d 1190
M. CASEY RODGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1193Plaintiff Crom, LLC ("Crom") filed this suit against its former employee, Phuong Bacon ("Bacon"), to enforce a Non-Compete Agreement and for damages caused by Bacon's alleged breach of the Agreement and breach of her common law duty of loyalty (Counts I and II).1
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011-09-12 · Published · cited 8× · 277 F.R.D. 316; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102907; 2011 WL 4047666
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ROYAL FURGESON, Senior District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is Representative Plaintiff Donald Stott’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement with Capital Financial Services, Inc., filed on February 18, 2011 (Stott Docket No. 2).1
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2021-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 23, 2021
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006-09-18 · Published · cited 46× · 464 F.3d 1260; 38 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2537; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23691; 2006 WL 2660931
BIRCH, Circuit Judge: The central issue in this interlocutory appeal is the proper reach of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Ross Glenn Moorman, Jr., argues that the district court erred in ruling that ERISA governed the disability insurance plan provided by UnumProvident Corporation, Unum Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-11-19 · Published · cited 75× · 980 F.3d 937
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1019 JOYCE MCKIVER; DELOIS LEWIS; DAPHNE MCKOY; ALEXANDRIA MCKOY; ANTONIO KEVIN MCKOY; ARCHIE WRIGHT, JR.; TAMMY LLOYD; DEBORAH JOHNSON; ETHEL DAVIS; PRISCILLA DUNHAM, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and DENNIS MCKIVER, JR.; LAJUNE JESSUP; DON LLOY
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2019-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE METRO STORAGE INTERNATIONAL LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, METRO ) STORAGE LATAM LLC, a Delaware limited ) liability company, MSI MANAGER LLC, a ) Delaware limited liability company, LATAM ) MANAGER LLC, a Delaware limited liability ) company, MATTHEW M. NAGEL, AS ) TRUSTEE OF THE MATTHEW M. NAGEL ) REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JULY 27, ) 2001, AS AM
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-04-25 · Published · cited 26× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 856; 2017 WL 1487439; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62790
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022-04-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01773-COA ROSIE ANDERSON AND CHARLES WHITE APPELLANTS v. MARION O’NEAL BROWN JACKSON, AS APPELLEES ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LEVON JACKSON LAWSON, SHIMEKA JACKSON, TERRY BUTLER, AND LEVON JACKSON, JR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/17/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HO
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2023-09-28 · Published · cited 0×
09/28/2023 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 9, 2022 Session COMMERCIAL PAINTING COMPANY INC. v. THE WEITZ COMPANY LLC ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-06-1573 JoeDae L.
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013-09-30 · Published · cited 6× · 501 B.R. 119; 2013 WL 5534237; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 4269
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE PAUL W. BONAPFEL, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction In an unrecorded trust indenture agreement for the issuance of tax-exempt bonds, plaintiff Municipal Corrections, LLC (the “Debtor”), the Chapter 11 debtor in possession in this case, “pledged and assigned” its interest in its real property to secure its obligation
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014-10-28 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 IL App (5th) 120245
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Bruntjen v. Bethalto Pizza, LLC, 2014 IL App (5th) 120245 Appellate Court MATTHEW BRUNTJEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BETHALTO Caption PIZZA, LLC, d/b/a Imo’s Pizza; and IMO’S FRANCHISING, INC., Defendants-Appellants (Kenneth Lyerla; Lisa Lyerla; Jeremiah Greene; Jason Yelton; Metro
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017-02-22 · Published · cited 26× · 215 F. Supp. 3d 524; 2017 WL 698536; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24394
OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, removed from the 112th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a),1 1441, and 1446, and *532seeking damages
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017-11-07 · Published · cited 5× · 533 S.W.3d 245
KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Rail Switching Services, Inc. (“RSSI”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Marquis-Missouri Terminal, LLC (“MMT”) on RSSI’s claim for tortious-interference. RSSI alleged in its petition that MMT interfered with a contract between RSSI and the Pemiscot County Port Authority (“the Port Authority”) granting
California Supreme Court · 2014-06-23 · Published · cited 619× · 59 Cal. 4th 348; 327 P.3d 129; 22 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1511; 173 Cal. Rptr. 3d 289; 2014 WL 2808963; 2014 Cal. LEXIS 4318; 199 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3773
Opinion LIU, J. In this case, we again address whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA; 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) preempts a state law rule that restricts enforcement of terms in arbitration agreements. Here, an employee seeks to bring a class action lawsuit on behalf of himself and similarly situated employees for his employer’s alleged failure to compensate its employees for, among other things, overtime and m
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-01002-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/10/2015 12:29:40 PM
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-03-26 · Published · cited 154× · 182 L. Ed. 2d 446; 132 S. Ct. 1414; 566 U.S. 221; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2535; 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 220; 80 U.S.L.W. 4269; 2012 WL 986812
Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. We consider whether the 2-year period to file suit against a corporate insider under § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U. S. C. § 78p(b), begins to run only upon the *223 insider’s filing of the disclosure stateme
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-03-19 · Published · cited 7× · 306 F.R.D. 312; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37256; 2015 WL 1321479
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.