Cases

AMENDED ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE comes before the Court as a disability discrimination action brought pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq., the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3603, et seq., and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”), 29 U.S.C. § 794, et seq. Plaintiffs are thirty-two deaf pers

712 S.E.2d 730 (2011) SUGAR CREEK CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. STATE of North Carolina, et al., Defendants. No. COA10-965. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 2, 2011. *732 North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law, by Jason Kay and Robert F. Orr, Raleigh, for Plaintiff-Appellants, Sugar Creek Charter

719 F.Supp.2d 846 (2010) Erick C. CARTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLES-BOWEN REALTY, INC., et al., Defendants, and Joshua J. Grzecki, Plaintiff, v. The Danberry Co., et al., Defendants. Case Nos. 3:05 CV 7427, 3:09 CV 400. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 30, 2010. *848 James S. Timmerb

ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

ORDER ON RELATORS’ RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING ABOUT ELECTRONIC FORMAT DISPUTE, DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF RE: PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM BACKUP TAPES AND THE FORMAT USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF EMAIL, AND RE-LATORS’ RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING ABOUT BACKUP TAPES DISPUTE WILLIAM V. GALLO, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION

[J-20-2022] [MO: Baer, C.J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT CAROL ANN CARTER, MONICA : No. 7 MM 2022 PARRILLA, REBECCA POYOUROW, : WILLIAM TUNG, ROSEANNE MILAZZO, : BURT SIEGEL, SUSAN CASSANELLI, LEE : CASSANELLI, LYNN WACHMAN, : ARGUED: February 18

970 N.E.2d 735 (2012) William T. CARTER, derivatively on behalf of CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, Inc., Appellant-Plaintiff, v. R. Glenn HILLIARD, et al., Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-1106-PL-582. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 22, 2012. *739 Richard E. Shevitz, Scott D. Gilchrist, Cohen & Malad LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys f

(2008) Maurice James SJOBLOM, on behalf of himself and a class of employees and/or former employees similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and Charter Communications, Inc., Defendants. No. 07-cv-451-bbc. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. March 4, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. This

Justice LEE, opinion of the Court: 11 This case presents questions concerning the seope of the people's initiative power under article VI of the Utah Constitution. Petitioners are Lehi City voters who sought to place on the municipal ballot initiatives regulating salaries and residency require*145ments for certain city employees. The City refused to ac

743 F.Supp.2d 103 (2010) In the Matter of the Petition of Robert CARTER, Jr., as owner of the Indigo Sky, for Exoneration from and Limitation of Liability. Robert Carter, Jr., Petitioner, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., Continental Casualty Co., Claimants. No. 3:09cv2057 MRK. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 30, 2010.

880 F.Supp. 1005 (1994) MOBIUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff. v. FOURTH DIMENSION SOFTWARE, INC., Defendant. No. 94 Civ. 0749 (LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 30, 1994. *1006 *1007 *1008 Jeffrey S. Trachtman, Jonathan Wagne

RULING AND ORDER MARK R. KRAYITZ, District Judge. This case arises from an August 14, 2009 fire at the Yankee Boat Yard and Marina (“Yankee Boat Yard”) in Portland, Connecticut. The fire destroyed Petitioner Robert Carter, Jr.’s motorboat, the Indigo Sky, and damaged other boats and property stored on land at the Yankee Boat Yard. The Indigo Sky may have been the source of the fire. Pursuant to th

FILED Jun 22 2012, 9:02 am FOR PUBLICATION CLERK of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT:

The opinion of the court was delivered by CARCHMAN, P.J.A.D. On this appeal, we address the question of a grant recipient’s responsibility to return federal grant funds when the recipient fails to comply with certain provisions of the Public School Contracts Law (PSCL), N.J.S.A. 18A:18A-4 and N.J.S.A. 18A:18A-5. Here, respondent Department of Education (DOE) ordered appellant Oceanside Charte

738 F.Supp. 417 (1990) BIRTCHER ELECTRO MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., a Colorado corporation, and the Birtcher Corporation, a California corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BEACON LABORATORIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 90-B-0432. United States District Court, D. Colorado. May 25, 1990. *418

OPINION ON REMAND Opinion on Remand by Justice RODRIGUEZ. This case involves an appeal from a judgment in a jury trial. It is before us on remand to address appellee Sharyland Water Supply Corporation’s (Sharyland) negligence claim against appellants Carter & Burgess, Inc. (C & B), Turner, Collie

JUSTICE LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion for the Court. The Charter School Program Act of 1995 (the Act), L. 1995, c. 426, §§ 1 to 18 (codified as amended at N.J.S.A. 18A:36A-1 to - 18), authorizes the establishment of charter schools in New Jersey. See N.J.S.A. 18A:36A-2 (finding that charter schools

ORDER MILLER, Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(4) to dismiss Count IV of plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. At issue are 1) whether defendant’s motion demonstrates that the facts alleged in Count IV support a claim seeking just compensation pursuant to the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause and 2) whe

639 F.Supp.2d 996 (2009) MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. HYSITRON INCORPORATED, Defendant. Civil File No. 06-3853 (MJD/AJB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. July 22, 2009. *997 Brent A. Lorentz, Daniel J. Kelly, David P. Pearson, Karen A. Brennan, and William A. McNab, Winthrop & Weinstine, PA, for Plaintif

19 F.Supp.2d 1246 (1997) CARTER CHEVROLET AGENCY, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. No. CIV-96-1673-C. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. March 17, 1997. Thomas J. Blalock, Shannon T. Self, Self Giddens & Lees, Oklahoma City, OK, David P. Hendel, Stephen B. Hurlbut, Wickwire, Gavin, PC, Vienna, VA, for Carter Chevrolet Agency