⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Carter v. Pace Financial”

Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2024-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. William Pace v. Hamilton Cove (A-4-23) (088302) Argued January 16, 2024 -- Decided July 10, 2024 PIERRE-LOUIS, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In this appeal, the Court considers (
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-11-24 · Published · cited 7× · 199 A.D.3d 1291; 159 N.Y.S.3d 182; 2021 NY Slip Op 06594
Carter v Fairchild-Carter (2021 NY Slip Op 06594) Carter v Fairchild-Carter 2021 NY Slip Op 06594 Decided on November 24, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua
Pace v. Quintanillapublic domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2015-07-31 · Published · cited 0× · 308 F.R.D. 644; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100519; 2015 WL 4605885
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [76] DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (“Mot.”) (Dkt. 76). I. Background This lawsuit is a putative securities fraud class action brought by Plaintiffs George Zuzulock, William Weakley, and Penny Pace against Defendants Timothy Quintanilla, Henry
State v. Carterpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-01-14 · Published · cited 1× · 183 N.E.3d 611; 2022 Ohio 91
[Cite as State v. Carter, 2022-Ohio-91.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 29091 : v.
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 204 So. 3d 803; 2015 WL 5813572; 2015 Miss. App. LEXIS 687
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-00041-COA JENNIFER CARTER APPELLANT v. JOSH CARTER APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/20/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN S. GRANT III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPE
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ) NIKKI S. CARTER et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-0744 (PLF)
Carter v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012-08-20 · Published · cited 13× · 886 F. Supp. 2d 1093; 2012 WL 3573879; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116993
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction The plaintiff, Michael Carter, seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying his applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) pursuant to Titles II and XVI of the Social
Carter v. Astruepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-03-04 · Published · cited 29× · 413 F. App'x 899
ORDER An Administrative Law Judge granted Romell Carter disability benefits for one year based on an injury to his foot, but the Appeals Council remanded that decision when it could not find audio tapes of the hearings necessary to review Carter’s argument that he is also disabled by depression and should have been awarded benefits through the date of the ALJ’s decision. A second ALJ issued the identical award in a comprehensive, 38-p
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-01-31 · Published · cited 67× · 881 F.3d 75
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 24, 2017 Decided January 31, 2018 No. 15-1177 PHH CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, RESPONDENT On Petition for Rehearing En Banc Theodore B. Olson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-11-21 · Published · cited 1× · 128 Fed. Cl. 770; 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1787; 2016 WL 6835546
RCFC 12(b)(6); RCFC 10(c); Breach of Contract; Duty; Damages; Firm-Fixed-Price Task Order; Contract Interpretation OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge In this ease, plaintiff Financial & Realty Services, LLC (“FRS”) claims it is entitled to payments pui’suant to a firm-fixed-price task order with the General Services Administrati
District Court, N.D. Texas · 2011-09-12 · Published · cited 8× · 277 F.R.D. 316; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102907; 2011 WL 4047666
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ROYAL FURGESON, Senior District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is Representative Plaintiff Donald Stott’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement with Capital Financial Services, Inc., filed on February 18, 2011 (Stott Docket No. 2).1
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-04-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
Idaho Supreme Court · 2010-01-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 27966/31928 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross Appellant, ) Boise, August 2009 Term ) v. ) 2010 Opinion No. 3 ) DALE CARTER SHACKELFORD, ) F
District Court, E.D. New York · 2003-05-15 · Published · cited 43× · 257 F. Supp. 2d 543; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8154; 2003 WL 21107303
257 F.Supp.2d 543 (2003) Nicholas DE PACE, Salvatore Di Blasi, and Andrew G. Molinaro, Plaintiffs, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. 02-CV-4312(ERK). United States District Court, E.D. New York. May 15, 2003. *546 Harvey W. Spizz, Spizz & Cooper, LLP, Mineola, NY, for Plaintiffs. David W. Ga
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Jul 08 2015, 8:33 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Steven E. Ripstra Gregory F. Zoeller Ripstra Law Office
District Court, S.D. New York · 2007-11-30 · Published · cited 9× · 525 F. Supp. 2d 448; 2007 WL 4208625; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88052
525 F.Supp.2d 448 (2007) WOLTERS KLUWER FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., Plaintiff, v. SCIVANTAGE, ADNANE CHARCHOUR, SANJEEV DOSS, CAMERON ROUTH and GREGORY ALVES, Defendants. No. 07 CV 2352(HB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 30, 2007. *449 Brian Jason Fischer, Harry Sandick, Charles B. Sklarsky, Jenner & Bloc
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2025-12-30 · Published · cited 0×
FILED DECEMBER 30, 2025 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE MICAHN T. CARTER, ) No. 40285-1-III
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984-06-27 · Published · cited 62× · 744 F.2d 255; 5 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2706; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 21030
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge. Contests for corporate control have become ever more frequent phenomena on the American business scene. Waged with the intensity of military campaigns and the weaponry of seemingly bottomless bankrolls, these battles determine the destinies of large and small corporations alike. Elaborate strategies and ingenious tactics have been developed both to facilitate takeover attempts and to defend ag
District Court, S.D. New York · 1987-01-15 · Published · cited 40× · 652 F. Supp. 1066; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180
652 F.Supp. 1066 (1987) SAMUEL M. FEINBERG TESTAMENTARY TRUST and Edith Citron, Plaintiffs, v. Leigh CARTER, John C. Duncan, David L. Luke III, John D. Ong, David V. Ragone, Ian M. Ross, Patrick C. Ross, Thomas C. Simons, William P. Stiritz, G. Jack Tankersley, John L. Weinberg, Carl Icahn and Crane Associates, Defendants, and The B.F. Goodrich Company, Nominal Defendant. No. 86 Civ. 0698 (JMW). <
District Court, N.D. Texas · 1980-09-12 · Published · cited 4× · 503 F. Supp. 680; 30 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 741; 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14021
503 F.Supp. 680 (1980) Patricia CARTER v. SHOP RITE FOODS, INC. No. CA-3-74-0620-G. United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division. September 12, 1980. *681 *682 *683 Deborah Altemore McCann, Durwood D. Crawford, Seay, Gwinn, Crawford, Mebus &am;