Cases

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered May 12, 2009, which denied petitioner’s motion to vacate the hearing officer’s determination, following a name-clearing hearing, that petitioner failed to demonstrate the falsity of certain statements in respondent Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s letter terminating his employment, and confirmed the determination, affirmed, without costs. The determination that pe

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered on or about August 10, 2006, which, in a proceeding against the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) and various of its officials seeking a name-clearing hearing, petitioner’s reinstatement to his position as MTA’s Deputy Director of Security, and damages pursuant to 42 USC § 1983 based on respondents’ failure to afford petitioner due process, denied respondent-appellant MTA

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered May 16, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted petitioners’ motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint. The court improvidently

629 F.3d 97 (2011) Louis R. ANEMONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Peter S. Kalikow, Katherine N. Lapp, Gary J. Dellaverson, and Matthew D. Sansverie, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 08-2646-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: June 23, 2009. Decided: January 4, 2011.

410 F.Supp.2d 255 (2006) Louis R. ANEMONE, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Peter S. Kalikow, Katherine N. Lapp, Gary J. Dellaverson and Matthew D. Sansverie, Defendants. No. 05 CIV.3170 (MBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 24, 2006. *256 *257

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. Paul Casale and Anthony Garcia (“named plaintiffs”) assert that Raymond W. Kelly, Police Commissioner of the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”); the City of New York; and unnamed NYPD personnel (collectively “defendants”) have violated and continue to violate their Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights and the rights of

CONGER, District Judge. These are actions brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees as provided by the Act. The suits were tried together without a jury. The plaintiffs are or were employees of the defendant Casale, performing their duties at the several garages of the defend

OPINION OF THE COURT VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge. This case involves an appeal by the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company First Mortgage 4% Bondholders Committee (“the New Haven Committee”) from an order of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania sitting as a Reorganization Court In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. The order in dispute, Order No.

Samaroo v New York City Tr. Auth. (2024 NY Slip Op 03774) Samaroo v New York City Tr. Auth. 2024 NY Slip Op 03774 Decided on July 10, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju

Plenty v New York City Tr. Auth. (2024 NY Slip Op 03768) Plenty v New York City Tr. Auth. 2024 NY Slip Op 03768 Decided on July 10, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi

OPINION OF THE COURT Phyllis Orlikoff Plug, J. Ordered that the motions and cross motion are consolidated for the purpose of disposition and are determined as follows: On December 19, 2002, between 9:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., plaintiff was the victim of a violent sexual assault and robbery. The incident began when a group of men attacked plaintiff and her boyfriend as they were walking al

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered July 18, 2013, which granted petitioners’ motion to deem a late notice of claim timely filed, nunc pro tunc, pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied. Petitioner Anthony Gonzalez is alleged to have sustained injury in a fall from the flat bed of a

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BLOCK, Senior District Judge Earlier this year, the Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. See Singh v. Joshi, 152 F.Supp.3d 112 (E.D.N.Y.2016). The factual background of the case and the Court’s legal analysis are set forth in full in that decision. In sum, the Court upheld rules promulgated by the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (“TLC”

In August 2000 the plaintiff, a builder, purchased a parcel of real property on Church Street in the Incorporated Village of Roslyn Harbor. The plaintiff hired the defendant John Amisano, *1038an architect, to prepare plans for modification of an existing house on the property. The Village approved those plans in December 2000, and the plaintiff commenced construction in January 2001. During the

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On August 5, 2010, the Plaintiff Mohammad M. Ahmed (the “Plaintiff’ or “Ahmed”) commenced this action against the Defendants T.J. Maxx Corp. and TJX Companies, Inc. (collectively, “the Defendants”) alleging that the Defendants failed to pay him overtime wages and retaliated against him in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C.

John G. Koeltl, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Cheryl Dukes, brings this action against the defendants, New York City Employees' Retirement System ("NYCERS") and its Board of Trustees, alleging violations stemming from her unsuccessful attempt to acquire accidental death benefits for her husband's death, which was allegedly caused by his work related to the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The defe

La Jueza Asociada Señora Pabón Charneco emitió la opinión del Tribunal. En el presente caso nos corresponde resolver si el Tribunal de Apelaciones erró al revocar la determinación del pe-ticionario, Departamento de Justicia, de denegar una soli-citud para recibir beneficios de representación legal presentada por la recurrida, Adaline Torres Santiago, por conducto del Art. 12 de la Ley Núm. 104 de 29 de junio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 15, 2011 Session MELODY JENNINGS BOWERS v. DANIEL R. BOWERS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 07D-689 Carol Soloman, Judge No. M2010-00311-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 7, 2011 Alleging Husband’s failure to pay child support and alimony as required, Wife filed petiti

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation, brings this action against Defen*327dant, the Town of Wales, alleging that the Town and its board interfered with National Fuel’s federal rights regarding construction of a natural gas compressor station in the To

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER COGAN, District Judge. The issue posed in this case is whether the customer accounts of an insolvent ser*558vice company, where each customer had the right to terminate service at any time, can nevertheless have value, such that if the principal of the business moves those customers to a third party in excha