Cases

Nos. 2-08-0959, 2-08-1037, 2-08-1137, 1-08-3008, 1-08-3030, 1-08-3054, 1-08-3313 cons. Filed: 9-30-10 _________________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT _________________________________________________________________________________ COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY

937 N.E.2d 685 (2010) 344 Ill.Dec. 662 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner, v. ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION; The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Lisa Madigan, The Attorney General; AARP; AARP Illinois; Bluestar Energy Services, Inc.; Building Owners and Managers Association of Chicago; Chicago Transit Authority; Citizens Utility Board; Chrysler, LLC; The City of Chicago; The Commercial Group (styled as such col

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

POSNER, Chief Judge. Commonwealth Edison Company and its defined-benefit pension plan brought this suit under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., against the administrator of the Illinois Uniform Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act, 765 ILCS 1025, seeking a declaration that ERISA preempts the Illinois statute to the extent that the statute regulates such plans. The district court agreed, precipitating this appeal by

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ASPEN, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Commonwealth Edison Company (“ComEd”) brings this two-count complaint against Diversified Technologies Group, Inc. (“Diversified/Maryland”) and Charles E. Jensen d/b/a Diversified Technologies (“Jensen” or “Diversified”) for breach of contract.1 Defendant Jensen has brought two amended counterclaims for br

249 F.Supp.2d 387 (2003) CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant v. NORTHEAST UTILITIES, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. No. 01 CIV.1893(JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 21, 2003. *390 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER KOELTL, District Judge. This case arises

OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. This case involves the damages claims of Plaintiffs Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Ed”) and Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC (“Entergy”) caused by the failure of the Department of Energy (“DOE”) to collect and dispose of spent nuclear fuel. Under the terms of DOE’s June 1983 Standard Contract, DOE was to begin collecting spent nuclear fu

667 F.Supp.2d 850 (2009) Cynthia N. YOUNG, on behalf of herself, and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. VERIZON'S BELL ATLANTIC CASH BALANCE PLAN, formerly known as Bell Atlantic Cash Balance Plan, formerly known as Bell Atlantic Management Pension Plan, and Verizon Communications, Inc., as successor in interest to Bell Atlantic Corporation, Defendants. Case No. 05 C 7314. United States District

OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. INTRODUCTION1 This case is one of first impression for the court. Although suits brought by utilities against the government for damages resulting from the non-performance by the Department of Energy (“DOE”) of its statutory and contractual obligations to collect spent nuclear fuel have become commonplace, this case is novel

OPINION re POST-TRIAL MOTIONS of the COMMONWEALTH of PENNSYLVANIA and JOHNSON & JOHNSON DEFENDANTS OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.BACKGROUND .1121 A. Opening.1121 B. Parties.1122 1. Plaintiff Agencies .1122 a. DPW/Pennsylvania Medicaid.1122 b.

36 A.3d 1197 (2011) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Plaintiff v. TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC.; Abbott Laboratories; AstraZeneca PLC; AstraZeneca, Holdings, Inc.; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP; AstraZeneca LP; Bayer AG; Bayer Corporation; SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline; Pfizer, Inc.; Pharmacia Corporation; Johnson & Johnson; Alza Corporation; Centocor, Inc.; Ethicon, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, L.P.; McNei

147 Ill. App.3d 534 (1986) 497 N.E.2d 1352 PAUL THATCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee (Dow Chemical Company, Third-Party Plaintiff and Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant; Schneider, Inc., Third-Party Defendant and Cross-Appellee; Dow Industrial Service et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees).

678 F.Supp.2d 512 (2010) COMMONWEALTH BRANDS, INC.; Conwood Company, LLC; Discount Tobacco City and Lottery, Inc.; Lorillard Tobacco Company; National Tobacco Company, L.P.; and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Food and Drug Administration; Margaret Hamburg, Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration; and Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health

McKAY, Circuit Judge. This diversity case arises out of long-term coal contracts between an Illinois public utility, Commonwealth Edison Company (Edison), and two Wyoming coal producers, Black Butte Coal Company and Big Horn Coal Company (collectively, the Coal Companies). The coal contracts together call for the supply and purchase of more than 180 million tons of coal through

755 F.Supp.2d 556 (2010) AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. SIDAMON-ERISTOFF, et al., Defendants. New Jersey Ret. Merch. Assn., Plaintiff, v. Sidamon-Eristoff, et al., Defendants.Aff. New Jersey Food Council, Plaintiff, v. State of New Jersey, et al., Defendants. Amer. Exp. Prepaid Card Mgmt. Corp., Plaintiff, v. Sidamon-Eristoff, et al., Defendants. Civi

37 Ill. App.3d 140 (1976) 345 N.E.2d 785 MARILYN GOWDEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. — (WILLARD BLAIR et al., Separate Objectors-Appellants.) No. 60272. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5th Division). Opinion filed March 12, 1976. Rehearing denied April 22, 1976.

APPEALS COURT ANDOVER EDUCATION ASSOCIATION vs. COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD & another.[1] Docket: 24-P-465 Dates: March 4, 2025 – September 9, 2025

126 Ill. App.3d 277 (1984) 466 N.E.2d 1351 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS et al., Defendants (The Department of Local Governmental Affairs, Defendant-Appellee; Zion Park District et al., Defendants-Appellants). No. 2-83-0725. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed July 27,

174 F.3d 870 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 2794,Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23,954COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY and Trustees of The CommonwealthEdison Service Annuity Fund, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Sarah D. VEGA, in her official capacity as Director, Stateof Illinois Department of Financial Institutions,Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-2417. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Ci

86 Ill. App.3d 768 (1980) 408 N.E.2d 263 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-1520. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (2nd Division). Opinion filed July 8, 1980. Richard G. Ferguson, Laurence D. Lasky, Paul F. Hanzlik, and William P. Surian