⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Cassandra Guy”

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2006-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
</
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2006-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
MUNSCH V. MUNSCH, ET AL. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-06-007-CV GUY B.M., II APPELLANT V.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004-07-26 · Published · cited 11× · 312 B.R. 491; 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 1151; 43 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 116; 2004 WL 1736999
312 B.R. 491 (2004) In re THE CASSANDRA GROUP, Debtor. Robert L. Geltzer, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Cassandra Group, Plaintiff, v. Guy D'Antona, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-41807BRL, Adversary No. 02-2693. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. July 26, 2004. *493 Bryan Cave LLP, by Robert A. Wolf, Mark S. Lichtens
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2024-11-05 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued November 5, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00262-CR ——————————— CASSANDRA YVETTE GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021-01-15 · Published · cited 99× · 985 F.3d 509
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0012p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CASSANDRA THOMPSON, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │
Melton v. Guypublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-01-20 · Published · cited 1× · 2016 Ohio 194
[Cite as Melton v. Guy, 2016-Ohio-194.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TIMOTHY A. MELTON : JUDGES: : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellant : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. : Hon. Craig R
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE, AT JACKSON _______________________________________________________ ) CASSANDRA LYNN LIPSCOMB, ) Shelby County Circuit Court ) No. 81763 & 85203 T.D. Plaintiff/Appellant. ) ) VS. ) C.A. No. 02A01-9711-CV-00293
State v. Guypublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000-07-19 · Published · cited 0× · 775 So. 2d 454; 2000 WL 1125628
775 So.2d 454 (2000) STATE of Louisiana v. Wilfred GUY. No. 99-KA-1893. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. July 19, 2000. *455 Harry F. Connick, District Attorney for Orleans Parish, Cate L. Bartholomew, Assistant District Attorney for Orleans Parish, New Orleans, LA, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee. Karen G. Are
State v. Guypublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996-01-31 · Published · cited 45× · 669 So. 2d 517; 1996 WL 39467
669 So.2d 517 (1996) STATE of Louisiana v. Terence GUY. No. 95-KA-0899. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. January 31, 1996. *519 Harry F. Connick, District Attorney of Orleans Parish, Karen Godail Arena, Assistant District Attorney of Orleans Parish, New Orleans, for the State of Louisiana. Laurie A. White, Ann
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 5, 2000 Session JAMI ALLYSON ROSS CARTER v. GUY MARSHALL CARTER Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County No. 30942, Richard Johnson, Chancellor FILED JANUARY 4, 2001 No. E2000-01283-COA-R3-CV This appeal from the Washington
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012-10-04 · Published · cited 10× · 56 A.3d 1227; 2012 ME 114; 2012 WL 4707106; 2012 Me. LEXIS 115; 116 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 311
LEVY, J. [¶ 1] By her complaint filed in April 2010, Lisa Levesque alleged gender discrimination, constructive discharge, and retaliation against her former employer, Androscoggin County. The Superior Court (Androscoggin County, MG Kennedy, J.) granted a partial summary judgment in favor of Androscoggin County dismissing the counts of constructive discharge and gender discrimination. The retaliation claim proceede
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO CASSANDRA MURPHY, ) No. ED112980 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Charles County vs. ) Cau
Washington Supreme Court · 1998-12-24 · Published · cited 115× · 136 Wash. 2d 946; 968 P.2d 871; 1998 Wash. LEXIS 943
Guy, J. This case involves review of an inverse condemnation cause of action brought by landowners against developers of neighboring property and King County for damages caused by surface waters which allegedly inundated their property. The question before us involves the possible basis for liability on the part of the County. FACTS Plaintiffs in the action below, Lonnie and Gloria Phillips (
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011-09-08 · Published · cited 7× · 817 F. Supp. 2d 556
817 F.Supp.2d 556 (2011) Collette DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. Susan Frattarola, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Mercy Health System of Southeastern Pennsylvania, et al., Defendants. Kenneth Lynn, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Aria Health System, et al., Defendants. Kenneth Lynn, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jefferson Health System, Inc., et al., Defendants. Cassandra Ruff, et al.
Belas v. Kigapublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 1998-07-30 · Published · cited 51× · 135 Wash. 2d 913
Guy, J. This is an original action brought by 10 elected county assessors challenging the constitutionality of a portion of a 1997 referendum which changed the method of assessing real property for the purpose of levying property taxes. The county assessors argue the new scheme violates the uniformity requirement of the Washington Constitution and unfairly shifts the tax burden from owners of rapidly appreciating property to own
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998-01-09 · Published · cited 1× · 255 Va. 23; 495 S.E.2d 819; 1998 Va. LEXIS 11
JUSTICE COMPTON delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in an action brought under the Death By Wrongful Act statutes, Code §§ 8.01-50 through -56. The question is whether the trial court correctly ruled that the plaintiff’s action was time barred when a nonsuited action was not refiled with
Rowand v. Rowandpublic domain
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974-12-02 · Published · cited 34× · 215 Va. 344; 210 S.E.2d 149; 1974 Va. LEXIS 289
215 Va. 344 (1974) DALE F. ROWAND v. CASSANDRA N. ROWAND. Record No. 730754. Supreme Court of Virginia. December 2, 1974. William B. Smith (Owen, Guy, Rhodes & Betz, on brief), for appellant. Grover C. Wright, Jr., for appellee. Present, All the Justices. 1. Husband's statements to wife to "get out," unaccompanied by sufficiently corr
Smith v. Charbonnetpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-08-02 · Published · cited 17× · 224 So. 3d 1055; 2017 La.App. 4 Cir. 0634; 2017 WL 3276441; 2017 La. App. LEXIS 1416
JUDGE SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS [ i This is an election contest suit. Plaintiffs/appellants Cassandra Smith and Keion Smith (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s July 27, 2017 judg*1057ment denying Plaintiffs’ objection to the candidacy of defendant Ernest “Freddie” Charbonnet for Orleans Parish City Council District E.1
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-07-30 · Published · cited 0×
07/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 8, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARY ANN SCATES Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henderson County No. 17-173-1 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 41 So. 3d 95; 2009 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 599; 2009 WL 4730814
BRYAN, Judge, concurring in part, concurring in the result in part, and dissenting in part. I concur in the main opinion insofar as it affirms the trial court’s denial of the motions to strike the affidavit of Shirley Guy-ton (“Shirley”) and to compel Shirley to submit to a deposition in Birmingham. I concur in the result insofar as the main opinion reverses the trial court’s o