Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cassie Roberts”
Roberts v. Lanigan Auto Salespublic domain
OPINION VANMETER, Judge: Evan Roberts appeals from the Kenton Circuit Court order dismissing his action against Lanigan Auto Sales (“Lanigan”). For the following reasons, we affirm. The underlying action arose after Roberts purchased a used vehicle from Lani-gan in September 2009. Roberts and Lan-igan executed a purchase contract, which contained a clause stating the vehicle
Veera Daruwalla v. Cassie Hampepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2744 ___________________________ In re: T-Mobile Customer Data Security Breach Litigation ------------------------------ Veera Daruwalla, Washington Western, 2:23-cv-01118; John G. Cooke, Washington Western, 2:21-cv-01324; Michael March, Washingt
Cassie v. Statepublic domain
192 Ga. App. 484 (1989) 385 S.E.2d 129 CASSIE v. THE STATE. PARAGUE v. THE STATE. A89A0414, A89A0640. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided July 13, 1989. Rehearings Denied July 26, 1989. Mark J. Kadish, James J. McGinnis, for appellant (case no. A89A0414). Robert G. Fierer, Barbara E. Keon, fo
Cassie Trueblood v. Wsdshspublic domain
FILED FOR PUBLICATION MAY 06 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CASSIE CORDELL TRUEBLOOD, next No. 15-35462 friend of Ara Badayos, an incapacitated person
Cassie Sutton v. New York City Transit Authority, Steven Sardisco, Michael Demeo, Docket No. 04-0429-Cvpublic domain
*158 NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents an issue of appellate jurisdiction in an unusual context and a merits issue concerning the appropriate amount of a lien for the fee of a client’s former attorneys, an issue also arising in a somewhat unusual context. Cassie Sutton endeavors to appeal from a
June 10, 2014 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals THE MONTROSE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS: CLAUDE WYNN, RANDY MICHMORE, CASSIE STINSON, KATHY HUBBARD, BRAD NAGAR, ROBERT JARA, BOBBY HUEGEL, DANA THORPE, LANE LLEWELLYN, TAMMY MANNING, DAVID ROBINSON, MICHAEL GROVER, AND RANDY ELLIS; AND BILL CALDERON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, Appell
Order filed, April 3, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-13-00233-CV ____________ THE MONTROSE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS; CLAUDE WYNN, RANDY MICHMORE, CASSIE STINSON, KATHY HUBBARD, BRAD NAGAR, ROBERT JARA, BOBBY HUEGEL, DANA THORPE, LANE LLEWELLYN, DAVID ROBINSON, MICHAEL GROVER,
Dismissed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Opinion filed June 10, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00233-CV THE MONTROSE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS: CLAUDE WYNN, RANDY MICHMORE, CASSIE STINSON, KATHY HUBBARD, BRAD NAGAR, ROBERT JARA, BOBBY HUEGEL, DANA THORPE, LANE LLEWELLYN, TAMMY MANNING, DAVID ROBINSON, MICHAEL GROVER, AND RANDY ELLIS; AND BILL CALDERON
Roberts v. Jones Lang LaSalle Ams., Inc.public domain
[Cite as Roberts v. Jones Lang LaSalle Ams., Inc., 2018-Ohio-1039.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO CRAIG ROBERTS, : APPEAL NO. C-160893 TRIAL NO. A-1505058 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. :
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0652 ══════════ Three Aces Towing, Inc. d/b/a Three Aces Storage, Petitioner, v. Cassie Landrum, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeffrey Landrum, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════
Affirmed in Part, and Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed June 24, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00409-CV CASSIE LANDRUM, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY LANDRUM, Appellant V. THREE ACES TOWING, INC. D/B/A THREE ACES STORAGE, Appell
Affirmed in Part, and Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed June 24, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00409-CV CASSIE LANDRUM, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY LANDRUM, Appellant V. THREE ACES TOWING, INC. D/B/A THREE ACES STORA
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Aitkenpublic domain
787 N.W.2d 152 (2010) In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert H. AITKEN, III, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 301711. No. A09-1066. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 29, 2010. *154 Martin A. Cole, Director, Cassie Hanson, Senior Assistant Director, Office of *155 Lawyers Profession
State v. Arnoldpublic domain
OPINION ROSS, Judge. Cassie Arnold appeals from her first-degree drug possession conviction, arguing that the state failed to prove possession and that her trial was unfair because the prosecutor defined “dominion” as “control” in his closing argument when discussing the legal standard for constructive possession. Because uncontroverted evidence exists that Arnold spent the day treating methamphetamine with
Faulkner v. Department of Correctionspublic domain
Culp, J.* ¶1 Newly enacted RCW 42.56.565(1) prohibits the award of penalties to inmates for violations of the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW, unless the court finds that the agency acted in bad faith in denying the person the opportunity to inspect or copy the public record. Inmate Clarence Faulkner submitted a public records request to the Washington State Department of Corrections (DOC)
In re the Personal Restraint of Gronquistpublic domain
Per Curiam ¶1 The Department of Corrections disciplined prison inmate Derek Gronquist for allegedly assaulting a correctional officer, imposing a sanction that included loss of early release credits. Gronquist challenged the department’s action by personal restraint petition filed directly in this court. The court’s commissioner dismissed the petition, and the court’s clerk awarded the State costs consisting of statutory attorney
In re the Personal Restraint of Stuhrpublic domain
Yu, J. ¶1 Petitioner Clark Stuhr is in Department of Corrections (DOC) custody, serving two consecutive sentences imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A RCW. As penalties for Stuhr’s serious disciplinary infractions, DOC has revoked potentially available good conduct time for both of his sentences. Stuhr contends that this loss of potential good conduct time violates statutory and constitutional
United States v. Castanedapublic domain
ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS HONORABLE ALEX KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation The court considers defendant Marcos Castaneda’s motion to correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and the government’s motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND Castaneda was convicted of four counts of armed bank robbery in 1994. PSR ¶ 1. The
Commonwealth Revenue Cabinet v. St. Ledgerpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ABRAMSON, Judge. The Commonwealth of Kentucky, Revenue Cabinet (the Cabinet) has moved pursuant to CR 65.07 for interlocutory relief from a June 10, 1997 injunction issued by the Jefferson Circuit Court. The injunction prevents the Cabinet from issuing certain intangible property tax refunds “unless it reserves out of each refund cheek six percent (6%) of the total refund amoun
Panasonic Latin America, S.A. v. Forward Air, Inc.public domain
20 So.3d 1013 (2009) PANASONIC LATIN AMERICA, S.A., Appellant, v. FORWARD AIR, INC., Appellee. No. 3D09-1018. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 4, 2009. Cassidy & Black and William E. Cassidy, Miami; Philip D. Parrish, Miami, for appellant. Lawrence J. Roberts, Coral Gables, for appellee. Before COPE and ROTHENBERG, JJ.,