⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Castello v. Commissioner of Social Security”

Indiana Tax Court · 1998-04-24 · Published · cited 85× · 694 N.E.2d 1230; 1998 Ind. Tax LEXIS 17; 1998 WL 201763
694 N.E.2d 1230 (1998) Ronald D. CLARK, Petitioner, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX COMMISSIONERS, Respondent. No. 49T10-9607-TA-00083. Tax Court of Indiana. April 24, 1998. *1232 Curtis J. Dickinson, David L. Pippen, Dickinson & Abel, Indianapolis, for Petitioner. Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney General, Vincent S. Mirkov, Deputy
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-07-24 · Published · cited 1× · 389 F. Supp. 3d 211
LOUIS L. STANTON, U.S.D.J. Plaintiffs Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and the People of the State of New York brought this action alleging violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act and New York law for deceptive advertising of a dietary supplement ("Prevagen") purporting to improve one's memory. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for lack of personal juris
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-09-28 · Published · cited 26× · 134 F. Supp. 3d 749; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129997; 2015 WL 5692174
OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: The parties to this litigation agree on certain underlying facts: The case stems from an accounting scandal involving Ag-Feed Industries, Inc. (“AgFeed”), and, more specifically, AgFeed’s agricultural operations in China. Investigation into these accounting irregularities culminated in a March 2014 enforcement action brought against AgFee
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2021-06-30 · Published · cited 56× · 492 P.3d 586; 2021 NMSC 026
Office of the Director New Mexico 13:39:18 2022.07.26 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-026 Filing Date: June 30, 2021 No. S-1-SC-38356 SEN. CLIFF PIRTLE, REP. ZACH COOK, REP. REBECCA DOW, SEN. CRAIG BRANDT, REP. WILLIE MA
Zinn v. McKunepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-05-12 · Published · cited 46× · 143 F.3d 1353; 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2251; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9486; 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,318; 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 435; 1998 WL 236329
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Jerilyn Zinn appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellees David McKune, Fritz Young and the Kansas Department of Corrections (Department).1 See Zinn v. McKune, 949 F.Supp. 1530 (D.Kan.1996). Relying on Lambertsen v. Utah Dept. of Corrections, 79 F.3d 1024 (10th Cir.1996), the district court
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999-08-02 · Published · cited 30× · 57 F. Supp. 2d 1; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15949; 1999 WL 556472
57 F.Supp.2d 1 (1999) Joseph CARLINO, Jr., Joseph Carlino, Sr., Elizabeth Carlino, Kyle Rossell, Cheryl Rossell, Elwood Wrigley, Joanne Wrigley, Steven Burkhardt And Kathleen Burkhardt, Todd Evans, Robert Evans, And Mildred Evans, Plaintiffs, v. GLOUCESTER CITY HIGH SCHOOL, Dr. Ronald Pritchett, James Hetherington, Gloucestor City Board Of Education, Shirley Cleary, Susan Allgeier, Leroy Kramer, Barbara Stout, Stanley Booth, Chris Connelly, Board
United States Court of Claims · 1960-01-20 · Published · cited 0× · 148 Ct. Cl. 71; 180 F. Supp. 342; 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 50
Madden, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: The plaintiff, a Portuguese corporation, sues the United States for breach of contract. Under the reciprocity provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2502 it has access to this court. The contract in suit was • made on September 11, 1952. On October 27 of that year the United States purported to cancel *73the co
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934-08-27 · Published · cited 40× · 74 S.W.2d 348; 335 Mo. 845; 1934 Mo. LEXIS 456
This is an original proceeding by information in the nature ofquo warranto. The information states that respondent, St. Louis Union Trust Company, "is a corporation organized under the statutes of the State of Missouri relating to trust companies, for the purpose of engaging in a general trust company business, and, being so organized, it is subject to the statutes of the State and has no power or authority under its charter except such as is conferred upon it by said statutes of Mis