Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Castillo v. GEO Secure Services, LLC”
Carlos Mondriguez-Torres v. Franklin Castillo Lopezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _______________________________ BAP NO. PR 20-030 _______________________________ Bankruptcy Case No. 19-01133-MCF _______________________________ FRANKLIN CASTILLO LOPEZ and MARIA D
in Re C & J Energy Services, Inc.public domain
NUMBER 13-20-00503-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE C & J ENERGY SERVICES, INC. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice
*827OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced securities-fraud, putative class action alleges material misrepresentations and omissions by Defendants regarding Key Energy Services, Inc.’s (“Key’s”) financial condition and the future of its business, leading to inflated stock prices in violation of §§ 10(b), co
Florida Eb5 Investments, LLC v. Wolfpublic domain
UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA EBS INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 19-3573 (RJL) ) CHAD WOLF, et al. )
in Re: Enterprise Crude Oil, LLCpublic domain
ACCEPTED 05-17-01421-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/30/2018 5:10 PM
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
ACCEPTED 14-15-00991-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
In Re Eric Reyna v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-24-00158-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE ERIC REYNA ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras By
Kirkpatrick v. Board of County Commissionerspublic domain
OPINION VIGIL, Judge. {1} This case is before us on a writ of certiorari to review a decision of the district court that certain interspousal transfers of land fall within the Family Transfer provisions of the Santa Fe County Land Development Code (Code), Santa Fe County, N.M., Ordinance 1996-10 (1996), and are therefo
New Mexico Gamefowl Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Kingpublic domain
215 P.3d 67 (2009) 2009-NMCA-088 NEW MEXICO GAMEFOWL ASSOCIATION, INC.; Charles Kent Bullock, d/b/a Bullock's Feed; Don Spearman, d/b/a DD Animal Nutrition and Supply; Tony T. Ortega, d/b/a Messilla Valley Feeds; Johnny Unias Montoya, d/b/a Johnny's Service Station; Raul Trevino, d/b/a Lewallen Supply; and Pradip D. Bhakta, d/b/a Hilltop Inn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of New Mexico ex rel. Gary KING; Faron Segotta; T
Sanchez-Penunuri v. Longshorepublic domain
*1138ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Guadalupe Sanchez-Penunuri’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. # 1.) For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Mr. Sanchez-Penunuri’s petition. I. BACKGROUND
USCA11 Case: 17-15787 Date Filed: 12/23/2020 Page: 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-15787 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:17-cv-8027-RLR DOUGLAS BOURDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Brewerpublic domain
ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION DAVID G. CAMPBELL, United States Magistrate Judge. This case concerns the constitutionality of the State of Arizona’s denial of driver’s licenses to persons commonly known as “DREAMers.”1 On June 15, 2012, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program, which provide
Kirkpatrick v. Santa Fe County BCCpublic domain
217 P.3d 613 (2009) 2009-NMCA-110 Charles KIRKPATRICK, June Kirkpatrick, Sudye Kirkpatrick, and James Kirkpatrick, Appellants-Respondents, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Appellee-Petitioner, and Mark Alexander, Martha Alexander, Edward Stainton, and Christine Stainton, Intervenors-Petitioners. No. 27,842. Court of Appeals of New Mexico.
State of Washington v. Trumppublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF No. 25-807 ARIZONA; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE D.C. No. OF OREGON; DELMY FRANCO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID KEOWN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 23-cv-3570 (CRC) INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs David Keown and Diana Angus are former members of
Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.public domain
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BLACKBURN, District Judge. This matter is before me on the following: (1) the plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [# 81]1 filed May 29, 2012; (2) the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 115] filed August 16, 2012; and (3) the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [# 146] filed November 13,
2018 WI 75 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP2019 COMPLETE TITLE: Tetra Tech EC, Inc., and Lower Fox River Remediation LLC, Petitioners-Appellants-Petitioners, v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Respondent-Respondent.
McMinn v. MBF Operating Acquisition Corp.public domain
164 P.3d 41 (2007) 2007-NMSC-040 Rory A. McMINN, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. MBF OPERATING ACQUISITION CORPORATION, a New Mexico corporation, Frank L. Sturges, and Mark W. Daniels, Defendants, and MBF Operating, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. No. 29,725. Supreme Court of New Mexico. June 27, 2007. *42 Sander
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. I. Introduction The U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission (“Plaintiff’) brought this action for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 against Defendant Farmers Insurance Com