Cases

OPINION AND ORDER GERARD E. LYNCH, District Judge. On September 13, 2007, this Court dismissed the securities fraud complaint in the putative class action, In re Refco Capital Markets, Ltd. Brokerage Customer Securities Litigation, No. 06 Civ. 643, 2007 WL 2694469, at *12-13 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 2007) (hereinafter “RCM I”), for failure to allege deceptive conduct, but granted Lead Plainti

[Cite as Cleveland v. Thorne, 2013-Ohio-1029.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 98365, 98474, 98503, 98695, 98696, and 98697 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

60 F.3d 415 Charles E. ATTEBERRY; Janice Atteberry; Jack L. Avery;Neta Avery; Robert W. Balentine; Pamela Kay Balentine;Glenn E. Banks; Estate of John F. Barnard, Jr., deceased;Betty Jo Barnard; John M. Bates; Susan K. Bates; SydneyF. Baustian; Lovelle Baustian; Patricia J. Beck; CloviaJ. Beck; Richard D. Berry; Joyce A. Berry; Jeff D.Blakely; Dorothy R. Blakely; Hubert H. Blanchard; JaniveS. Blanchard;

*1557JUDGMENT BILLINGS, District Judge. Plaintiff has filed his complaint and the defendant appeared by counsel, filed answer to the complaint and, without admitting liability, agrees to the entry of this judgment without contest. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that defendant, her agents, se

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

586 F.Supp.2d 172 (2008) In re REFCO CAPITAL MARKETS, LTD. BROKERAGE CUSTOMER SECURITIES LITIGATION. VR Global Partners, L.P. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Phillip R. Bennett et al., Defendants. Capital Management Select Fund Ltd. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Phillip R. Bennett et al., Defendants. Nos. 06 Civ. 643(GEL), 07 Civ. 8686(GEL), 07 Civ. 8688(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New Yor

532 U.S. 105 (2001) CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. v. ADAMS No. 99-1379. United States Supreme Court. Argued November 6, 2000. Decided March 21, 2001. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *107 *107 Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, i

Alice Robie Resnick, J. I Am.Sub.H.B. No. 350 Converts the Drive for Civil Justice Reform into an Attack on the Judiciary as a Coordinate Branch of Government For more than a decade, Ohio has been home to an ongoing conflict over the necessity and propriety of transforming the civil justice system. In its most elementary form, this conflict reflects a power struggle between those who s

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 451.] THE STATE EX REL. OHIO ACADEMY OF TRIAL LAWYERS ET AL. v. SHEWARD, JUDGE, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward, 1999-Ohio-123.] Tort reform—Am.Sub.H.B. No. 350 unconstitutional in toto—Standing—Where object of an action in mandamus and/or prohibition is to procure the enforcement

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the District Court1 granting summary judgment and dismissing a claim brought under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act (the Act), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-20 (1988 & Supp. V 1993), and also dismissing the plaintiffs’ supplemental state law claims. We affirm. *418

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

LEVINSON, Justice. These consolidated appeals oblige us to revisit Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 104 S.Ct. 2321, 81 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984), Hawai'i Housing Authority v. Lyman, 68 Haw. 56, 704 P.2d 888 (1985), and Takabuki v. Housing Finance and Development Corp., 72 Haw. 466, 822 P.2d 955 (1991), in order to address the question whether the Hawai'i Land Reform Act, Hawai'i Revised S

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri