⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Caudle v. Anderson”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993-01-27 · Published · cited 0× · 986 F.2d 1426; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9486; 1993 WL 18609
986 F.2d 1426 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. P
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-02-07 · Published · cited 9× · 91 F.4th 1233
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0021p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ STEPHEN CAUDLE, │ Plaintiff-Appella
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987-10-08 · Published · cited 1× · 828 F.2d 1111
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: This case consolidates appeals in two criminal cases involving a total of seven defendants. All defendants were charged with several counts relating to the distribution of 3,4-methylenedioxymethampheta-mine, also known as MDMA or Ecstasy. The district court dismissed the indictments against the defendants and the government appealed. We affirm. I. The fac
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-08-19 · Published · cited 9× · 804 F. Supp. 2d 32; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92590; 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 53; 2011 WL 3632211
804 F.Supp.2d 32 (2011) Frazier CAUDLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-00205 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 19, 2011. *37 John Peter Relman, Jennifer I. Klar, Katherine A. Gillespie, Megan Moran-Gates, Relman, Dane & Colfax, PLLC, Washington, DC,
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 407 F. App'x 963
ORDER Sabeel Caudle El sued the Lake County sheriffs and other county officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging, among other things, that the conditions of his pretrial confinement violated his constitutional rights. After dismissing several claims at the pleading stage, the court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants on the remaining claims. Caudle El devotes the bulk of his appellate brief to arguing ab
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRAZIER CAUDLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action 08-00205 (HHK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In June and July of 2010, a three-week jury trial was held in this case. The jury retur
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2011-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 18, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTINE CAUDLE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. II-CR094394 Timothy L. Easter, Judge No. M2010-01172-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 8, 2011 The Defendant, Christine Caudle, pled guilty to reckless endangerment with a deadly w
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2012-11-27 · Published · cited 931× · 388 S.W.3d 273; 2012 WL 5907374; 2012 Tenn. LEXIS 824
OPINION GARY R. WADE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. The defendant pled guilty to reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon and theft of merchandise over five hundred dollars. The trial court sen
California Court of Appeal · 1997-11-17 · Published · cited 23× · 59 Cal. App. 4th 188; 69 Cal. Rptr. 2d 69; 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8691; 97 Daily Journal DAR 14061; 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 928
59 Cal.App.4th 188 (1997) LETICIA CONTRERAS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MARK ANDERSON et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. A075319. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three. November 17, 1997. *191 COUNSEL William J. Petzel for Plaintiff and Appellant. Caudle, Welch, Politeo & Bo
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014-06-27 · Published · cited 1× · 33 F. Supp. 3d 1288; 2014 WL 2999178; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87647
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. I. Introduction This lawsuit arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). (Doc. 1 at 1). Plaintiff Vanessa Caudle (“Ms. Caudle”) filed her complaint on March 25, 2014. (Doc. 1). The defendants named in Ms. Caudle’s lawsuit are Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”
Supreme Court of Virginia · 1979-11-21 · Published · cited 11× · 260 S.E.2d 193; 220 Va. 495; 1979 Va. LEXIS 289
260 S.E.2d 193 (1979) CAUDLE-HYATT, INC. and Aetna Insurance Co. v. Lucille MIXON. Record No. 790449. Supreme Court of Virginia. November 21, 1979. Mary Louise Kramer, Frank B. Miller, III, Richmond (Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, Richmond, on brief), for appellants. Charles F. Groom, Jr., Newport News (Harry E. Atkinson, Newport News, on brief), for ap
Caudle v. Thomasonpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 1997-10-06 · Published · cited 4× · 992 F. Supp. 1; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21572; 1997 WL 827448
OPINION HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge. This case arises out of a controversy surrounding the White House Travel Office. The matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the motion, plaintiffs opposition, defendant’s reply, and the arguments of counsel at a hearing, the Court concludes that the motion should be granted and summary judgment be entered
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002-10-24 · Published · cited 2× · 108 S.W.3d 319; 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 7563; 2002 WL 31388970
JIM WORTHEN, Justice. Texas residents Nancy Caudle, Mark Cobble, Phyllis Keys, and James Rotter, individually and as representatives of a class of others similarly situated (“Appel-lees”) brought suit in Anderson County, Texas, challenging the constitutionality of a New Mexico statute providing retirement benefits to employees of the State of New Mexico. The special appearance filed by the State of New Mexico, New Mexico Edu
District Court, S.D. New York · 2008-08-28 · Published · cited 27× · 580 F. Supp. 2d 273; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67463; 2008 WL 4104035
(2008) Terrell CAUDLE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TOWERS, PERRIN, FORSTER & CROSBY, INC., Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 2480(PKC)(DFE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge. Plaintiff Terrell Caudle, individually and on
Supreme Court of the United States · 1960-03-28 · Published · cited 2× · 362 U.S. 936; 80 S. Ct. 756
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 271 F. 2d 333.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1958-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 356 U.S. 921; 78 S. Ct. 700
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion the petitions should be granted. Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications. Reported below: 249 F. 2d 576.
Caudle v. Leathpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937-06-03 · Published · cited 3× · 175 So. 919; 234 Ala. 695
Affirmed on authority of Caudle v. Cotton, ante, p. 126,173 So. 847, and Kennedy v. Shamblin, ante, p. 230, 174 So. 773. ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2016-02-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 12, 2015 RANDY BEA ANDERSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 21897 Stella L. Hargrove, Judge No. M2015-00112-CCA-R3-PC – Filed February 12, 2016 The Petitioner, Randy Bea Anderson, appeals from the denial of post-conviction relief arising fr
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011-10-20 · Published · cited 48× · 659 F.3d 151; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 21239; 2011 WL 5007175
659 F.3d 151 (2011) John ANDERSON, Jessica Choate, Michael Cyr, Elizabeth Dowd, Steve Earley, Cyndi Fear, Thomas Fear, Mark Follansbee, Carlton Greely, Robert Hanson, Bruce Hatch, Pauline Hatch, John Hutchings, Nancy Hutchings, Robert Jenkins, Pamela LaMotte, Pamela Merrill, Jeanne Smith, Eileen Turcotte, Lori Valburn and Pamela Williams, Plaintiffs, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. HANNAFORD BROTHERS CO., Defendant, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, D
In Re Caudlepublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1981-05-06 · Published · cited 17× · 13 B.R. 29; 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3803; 7 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1301
13 B.R. 29 (1981) In re Billy Wayne CAUDLE and wife, Dola Myrie Caudle, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 81-20328. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee, W.D. May 6, 1981. *30 Ellen E. Fite, Memphis, Tenn., for debtors. Gary L. Jewel, Memphis, Tenn., for Memphis Bank & Trust Co. *31