⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

19 opinions for “Center For Biological Diversity v. Daugherty”

District Court, N.D. California · 2007-08-21 · Published · cited 3× · 571 F. Supp. 2d 1105; 37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20217; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65456; 2007 WL 2408901
(2007) CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dr. William BRENNAN, et al., Defendants. No. C 06-7062 SBA. United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. August 21, 2007. ORDER SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Before the Court is the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 7]; the defendan
Roe v. Critchfieldpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-03-20 · Published · cited 8× · 137 F.4th 912
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REBECCA ROE, by and through her No. 23-2807 parents and next friends, Rachel and Ryan Roe; SEXUALITY AND D.C. No. GENDER ALLIANCE, an association, 1:23-cv-00315- DCN Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION DEBBIE CRITCHFIELD, in her official capacity as Idaho State
Roe v. Critchfieldpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-05-23 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RYAN ROE; RACHEL ROE; No. 23-2807 SEXUALITY AND GENDER ALLIANCE, an association, D.C. No. 1:23-cv-00315- Plaintiffs-Appellants, DCN v. ORDER AND DEBBIE CRITCHFIELD, in her AMENDED official capacity as Idaho State OP
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-07-21 · Published · cited 0×
07/21/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 25, 2020 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GARY WAYNE FORD Appeal from the Criminal Court for Meigs County No. 2015-CR-53 Jeffery Hill Wicks, Judge No. E2019-00684-CCA-R3-CD The defendant
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-06-03 · Published · cited 16× · 379 F. Supp. 3d 8
TREVOR N. McFADDEN, U.S.D.J. Few ideas are more central to the American political tradition than the doctrine of separation of powers. Our Founders emerged from the Revolution determined to establish a government incapable of repeating the tyranny from which the Thirteen Colonies escaped. They did so by splitting power across three branches of the federal government and by providing each the tools required to preserve control over i
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1130 Doc: 142 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 68 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1078 B.P.J., by her next friend and mother; HEATHER JACKSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; HARRISON COUNTY B
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-06-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:19-cv-00969 (TNM) STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Treasury et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Few ideas are more centr
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-04-16 · Published · cited 11× · 98 F.4th 542
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1078 Doc: 187 Filed: 04/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 68 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1078 B.P.J., by her next friend and mother; HEATHER JACKSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; HARRISON COUNTY B
Conover v. Conoverpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2016-07-07 · Published · cited 30× · 146 A.3d 433; 450 Md. 51; 2016 Md. LEXIS 813
Adkins, J. Child custody and visitation decisions are among the most serious and complex decisions a court must make, with grave implications for all parties. The dissolution of a non-traditional marriage just compounds the difficulties of this already challenging inquiry. This appeal arises out of a divorce between a lesbian couple, and involves a dispute over one spouse’s right of access to a child conceived by artificial in
Mahmoud v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 606 U.S. 522
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 522–655 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
State v. McCleesepublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-08-23 · Published · cited 4× · 333 Conn. 378
Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL October 15, 2019 378 OCTOBER, 2019 333 Conn. 378 State v. McCleese STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. WILLIAM MCCLEESE (SC 20081) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syll
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 605 U.S. 495
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 2 Pages 495–608 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 18, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 458× · 603 U.S. 369
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 369–479 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 28, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2015-07-09 · Published · cited 2× · 129 F. Supp. 3d 1069; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176969; 2015 WL 10458823
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM ORDER RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This..subproceeding is before the Court pursuant to the request of. the Makah Indian Tribe (the “Makah”) to determine the usual and accustomed fishing grounds (“Ü & A”) of the . Quileute Indian Tribe (the “Quileute”) and the Quinault Indian Nation
People v. Barrerapublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2026-06-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARCOS ESQUIVEL BARRERA, Defendant and Appellant. S103358 Los Angeles County Superior Court PA029724 June 1, 2026 Justice Kruger authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero an
California Court of Appeal · 2012-01-25 · Published · cited 171× · 202 Cal. App. 4th 1342; 137 Cal. Rptr. 3d 293; 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 57
Opinion ZELON, J. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint against defendant and respondent Chevron U.S.A., Inc., asserting claims for violation of the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200) (UCL or section 17200), violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.) (CLRA), breach of contract and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs’ claims
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-11-06 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0307p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DEFENDING EDUCATION, fka Parents Defending
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-11-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, ) UNITED STATES HOUSE OF ) REPRESENTATIVES, ) ) Plaintiff, )
In re E.B.public domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2012-06-21 · Published · cited 23× · 229 W. Va. 435; 729 S.E.2d 270; 2012 WL 2368978; 2012 W. Va. LEXIS 314
BENJAMIN, Justice: The instant action is before this Court upon the appeal of Michael Lewis, Secretary, West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, (hereinafter “DHHR”),1 intervenor below, from a final order entered on July 12, 2010, in an infant summary proceeding under W. Va.Code § 44-10-14 (2002). In its order, the circuit court granted the motion of Respondent, Holly G.,