⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Cesar Contreras and Reyna Contreras”

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2007-08-23 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-03-314-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS <
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2004-12-30 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-01-836-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - ED
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Bartlett v. Baasiripublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-08-24 · Published · cited 4× · 81 F.4th 28
21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG
District Court, D. Colorado · 2012-08-13 · Published · cited 4× · 886 F. Supp. 2d 1212; 2012 WL 3307000; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113440
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS MARCIA S. KRIEGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Defendant’s (“Avanza”) Motion to Dismiss (# 14), the Plaintiffs’ response (# 17), and Avanza’s reply (# 20). FACTS Although lengthy, the Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (# 3) describes a straightforward factual sc
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015-08-17 · Published · cited 1× · 120 F. Supp. 3d 704; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108076; 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,383; 2015 WL 4885535
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge, United States District Court Overview Before the Court are seven motions for summary judgment filed by the Defendant, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (“Chipotle”). Each motion seeks entry of judgment on the claims of one 6f the seven Plaintiffs. (Docs. 36-42) Plaintiffs have filed a combined response brief to all seven motions (
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 313× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 166 S.W.3d 514; 2004 Tex. LEXIS 1462; 2004 WL 3328645
APPOINTMENT OF PRETRIAL JUDGE IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CASE: Pursuant to Administrative Rule 13, the cases listed on Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, and tag-along cases if any, are transferred to Judge Tracy Christopher of the 295th District Court of Harris County. Justice CASTILLO not sitting. APPENDIX A Amended Appendix A, Part I and
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 534 F.3d 1320; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1638; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15964
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under