⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Cesar Eduardo Arellano”

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2014-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-14-00323-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE OCEANOGRAFIA, S.A. de C.V., OTTO CANDIES, LLC, CANDIES MEXICAN INVESTMENTS, AND OSA INTERNATIONAL On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2014-08-29 · Published · cited 0× · 492 S.W.3d 330; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 9708
MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice PERKES. 1 ’ ’ On June 11, 2014, relators Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. (“Oceanografía”), Otto Candies, LLC (“Otto Candies”), Candies Mexican Investments (“Candies Mexican”), and OSA International, filed a petition for writ of ma
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-06-07 · Published · cited 105× · 650 F.3d 350; 2011 WL 2207110
650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover
Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2026-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III LUISA B. RONDÓN APELACIÓN ACOSTA procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelante TA2026AP00464 Instancia, Sala Superior de Carolina v.
In re Colonpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016-09-30 · Published · cited 4× · 558 B.R. 563; 2016 WL 5820026
OPINION AND ORDER Enrique S. Lamoutte, United States Bankruptcy Judge The issue pending in this case is whether Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (hereinafter referred to as “Banco Popular” or “BPPR”) and its affiliate Popular Auto,' Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Popular Auto”) failed to comply with the requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 303(b) because at the time the involuntary petition was filed (November 22, 200
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991-04-29 · Published · cited 22× · 932 F.2d 218
932 F.2d 218 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 455, 1991 A.M.C.2017, 59 USLW 2687,118 Lab.Cas. P 35,475 Ernesto C. CRUZ, Victorino A. Domingo, Zaldy N. Bantilian,Leonardo J. Espiritu, Wilfredo D. Jequinto, Juan S.Terencio, Severiano S. Gasataya, Jr., Roberto A. Alejado,Vicente B. Solano, Cesar B. Del Rosario, Renato M. Santiago,Erlito R. Vistar, Richard B. Celoso, Cirilo R. Pacheco,Antonio T. Tani
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 314× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 166 S.W.3d 514; 2004 Tex. LEXIS 1462; 2004 WL 3328645
APPOINTMENT OF PRETRIAL JUDGE IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CASE: Pursuant to Administrative Rule 13, the cases listed on Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, and tag-along cases if any, are transferred to Judge Tracy Christopher of the 295th District Court of Harris County. Justice CASTILLO not sitting. APPENDIX A Amended Appendix A, Part I and
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991-04-29 · Published · cited 4× · 932 F.2d 218; 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 455; 1991 A.M.C. 2017; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8147; 1991 WL 64227
ALITO, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The majority affirms the decision of the district court holding that the plaintiffs in this case, foreign seamen on American-flag ships engaged in trade between foreign ports, were not covered by the minimum wage provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 206. The district court concluded: first, that American law did not apply under choice-of-law principles t