⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Chamberlain Group, Inc., The v. Lear Corporation”

District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 758 F. Supp. 2d 542; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130163; 2010 WL 5186633
758 F.Supp.2d 542 (2010) The CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. and Johnson Controls Interiors L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. LEAR CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 05 CV 3449. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 9, 2010. *543 Karl Regan Fink, Allen E. Hoover, John F. Flannery, Joseph Frank Marinelli, Rudy I. Kratz, Ka
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-11-08 · Published · cited 1× · 270 F.R.D. 392; 77 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1281; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118352; 2010 WL 4595512
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge. This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion for sanctions and Plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of documents. Both motions have been referred to this Court from District Judge Amy J. St. Eve, as they are interrelated. Specifically, the motions arise from an incident in which a former contract employee o
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-11-24 · Published · cited 5× · 756 F. Supp. 2d 938; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124566; 2010 WL 4884448
756 F.Supp.2d 938 (2010) The CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. and Johnson Controls Interiors L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. LEAR CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 05 CV 3449. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 24, 2010. *942 Karl Regan Fink, Allen E. Hoover, John F. Flannery, Joseph Frank Marinelli, Rudy I. Kratz, K
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008-02-19 · Published · cited 35× · 516 F.3d 1331; 86 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1104; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 3448; 2008 WL 426497
516 F.3d 1331 (2008) The CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, and Johnson Controls Interiors LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 2007-1314, 2007-1467. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. February 19, 2008. *1332 *1333 Donald R. Dunne
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-10-14 · Published · cited 9× · 418 B.R. 47; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98599; 2009 WL 3335942
418 B.R. 47 (2009) In re LEAR CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. The Chamberlain Group, Inc. and Johnson Controls Interiors, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Lear Corporation, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-14326 (ALG). Adv. No. 09-01441 (ALG). District Court Case No. 09 Civ. 7366(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 14, 2009. *48
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011-06-10 · Published · cited 2× · 819 F. Supp. 2d 490; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62030; 2011 WL 2308694
819 F.Supp.2d 490 (2011) The FOX GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. CREE, INC., Defendant. Action No. 2:10cv314. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. June 10, 2011. *493 Andrew K. Rudiger, Stephen Edward Noona, Kaufman & Canoles PC, Norfolk, VA, Denise Whelton Defranco, Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett &am;
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 447 B.R. 475
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 07-974 (RMC)
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013-08-09 · Published · cited 33× · 726 F.3d 1296; 107 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1879; 2013 WL 4034379; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16506
*1299 RADER, Chief Judge. Aria Diagnostics, Inc., now known as Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. (Ariosa) sought a declaration that its Harmony test did not infringe any claim of U.S. Patent No. 6,258,540 (the '540 patent), owned by defendant Isis Innovation Limited (Isis) and licensed by Isis exclusively to Se
District Court, N.D. California · 2010-12-16 · Published · cited 3× · 771 F. Supp. 2d 1164; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133296; 2010 WL 5211454
771 F.Supp.2d 1164 (2010) CONCEPTUS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOLOGIC, INC., Defendant. No. C 09-02280 WHA. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 16, 2010. *1167 Bryan K. Anderson, Sidley Austin LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Kathleen Dunn Patterson, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, CA, M. Patricia Thayer,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 898 F. Supp. 2d 1018; 2012 WL 4482670; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137705
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge. On July 20, 2009, Plaintiff Morningware, Inc. (“Morningware”), filed its Complaint against Hearthware Home Products, Inc. (“Hearthware”), alleging that Hearthware had commercially disparaged Morning-ware’s goods, had committed the common-law tort of unfair competition, and had violated the Deceptive Trade Practices Act of Illinois,
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011-03-17 · Published · cited 2× · 803 F. Supp. 2d 397; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27886; 2011 WL 996794
803 F.Supp.2d 397 (2011) PFIZER INC., Pfizer Ltd., and Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Plaintiffs, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 2:10cv128. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. March 17, 2011. *400 Aaron Stiefel, Daniel Peter Dinapoli, Marc Nathan Zubick, Soumitra Deka, Kaye Sch
District Court, C.D. California · 2009-12-15 · Published · cited 11× · 719 F. Supp. 2d 1115; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129128; 2009 WL 6617192
719 F.Supp.2d 1115 (2009) AURORA WORLD, INC., Plaintiff, v. TY INC., Defendant. Case No. CV 09-08463 MMM (Ex). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 15, 2009. *1121 Raymond B. Kim, Vincent Henry Chieffo, Wendy M. Mantell, Courtney J. Chai, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Robert L. Meylan, Shaunt T. Arevian, Murphy Rosen
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010-02-25 · Published · cited 91× · 595 F.3d 1340; 93 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1805; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3914; 2010 WL 653271
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER, in which District Judge CLARK joins. Circuit Judge LOURIE concurs in the result. Concurring opinion filed by District Judge CLARK. RADER, Circuit Judge. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held that eS-peed, Inc., Ecco LLC, Ecco Ware Ltd., and eSpeed International Ltd. (collectively, “eSpeed”) infringed the asserted cla
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 675 F. Supp. 2d 605; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115486; 2009 WL 4840101
675 F.Supp.2d 605 (2009) AMERICAN PILEDRIVING EQUIPMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. GEOQUIP, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:08cv547. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. December 11, 2009. *607 Craig James Madson, Madson IP PC, Farmington, UT, Stephen Edward Noona, Kaufman & Canoles, P.C., Norfolk, VA,
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1392, -1393, -1422 TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESPEED, INC., ECCO LLC, ECCOWARE LTD., and ESPEED INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Defend
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005-10-18 · Published · cited 18× · 427 F.3d 958; 76 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1914; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22370; 2005 WL 2649293
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. Dissenting in part opinion filed by Circuit Judge CLEVENGER. PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. Medlmmune, Inc., a licensee in good standing under a patent owned by Genen-tech, Inc. and City of Hope (collectively “Genentech”), seeks by declaratory action to challenge the validity and enforceability of the licensed patent on various grounds
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008-08-26 · Published · cited 2× · 573 F. Supp. 2d 855; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65796; 2008 WL 4053447
(2008) EVERETT LABORATORIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BRECKENRIDGE PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-3156 (JLL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 26, 2008. OPINION LINARES, District Judge. Plaintiff Everett Laboratories, Inc. ("Everett") sued defendant Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. ("Breckenridge") for,
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2010-08-03 · Published · cited 1× · 735 F. Supp. 2d 535; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79286; 2010 WL 3064302
735 F.Supp.2d 535 (2010) US FOAM, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ON SITE GAS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. On Site Gas Systems, Inc., Plaintiff, v. USF Technologies, Inc., et al., Defendants. USF Equipment and Services, Ltd., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Allied International Emergency, LLC., et al., Defendants. US Foam, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Cummins Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants. Civil A