Cases

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered May 28, 1999, which, in an action involving the provision of benefits under health insurance policies issued or administered by defendants, granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, modified, on the law, to reinstate the sixth cause of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The facts are fairly set forth by the dissent. We would

Tom Glaze, Justice, concurring. The suggestion that equity has no subject-matter jurisdiction in this case wholly ignores settled law and the facts. Although the majority opinion concludes the chancery judge here had jurisdiction of this case, I write to explain why the chancellor had the authority to rule as he did. Melissa and Mellonie Conrad were ages eight

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, CONTINENTAL ) CASUALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, NAVIGATORS ) INSURANCE COMPANY, RSUI ) INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ) BERKLEY INSURANCE ) COMPANY,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, CONTINENTAL ) CASUALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, NAVIGATORS ) INSURANCE COMPANY, RSUI ) INDEMNITY COMPANY, and ) BERKLEY INSURANCE ) COMPANY,

This is an appeal by defendant Rheta Kabbaz, the second wife of one Lee Kabbaz, from a summary judgment rendered by the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County in favor of plaintiffs, William Kabbaz, Robert Kabbaz, Gregory W. Kabbaz and Mary Patricia Ashley, adult children of Lee Kabbaz by his first marriage, awarding to the plaintiffs the proceeds of a group life insurance policy issued by the defendant, the Prudential Insurance Company, on the life of said Lee Kabbaz and the lives of other

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis dismissing a suit in equity which was filed by appellant through his mother as guardian. Appellant will be referred to herein as plaintiff. Plaintiff's brief contains a statement of the case which, according to the adverse party's brief, is "a true reflection of the record." Therefore, in stating the case, we shall utilize plaintiff's statement without quotation marks, but make such minor changes as we deem

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE MATTER OF THE REHABILITATION ) C.A. No. 2019-0175-JTL OF SCOTTISH RE (U.S.), INC. ) OPINION REGARDING THE LIQUIDATION STANDARD Date Submitted: January 20, 2022 Date Decided: April 18, 2022 Peter B. Ladig, GianClaudio Finizio, BAYARD, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Diane J. Bartels, Wilmington, Delaware; James J. Black, III, Jeffrey B. Micel

This is two law suits tried together. Both cases are on industrial insurance policies on the life of Allen A. Tanner, deceased. The complainants in both cases are the same, being Mrs. Virginia Parmer, Administratrix of the estate of Allen A. Tanner, deceased, Mrs. Emma S. Tanner, the widow, and Allen Lee Tanner, a two year old boy, suing by his mother and next friend. The defendants in one case are the Prudential Life Insurance Company of America and Mrs. Annie O. Tanner, the mother of the de

Carleton Harris, Chief Justice. This appeal relates to claim for hospital and medical benefits under the terms of a policy issued to appellants, Allen E. Marshall and his wife Loretta Marshall, by appellee, Prudential Insurance Company. Application was made on March 26, 1969, and the policy was issued to Mr. Marshall and also provided coverage for Mrs. Marshall. From November 6, 1969, through

285 So.2d 689 (1973) PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Reginald RHODRIQUEZ, Appellee. No. 73-241. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 27, 1973. Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings, and Clifford B. Wentworth, Miami, for appellant. Gus Efthimiou, Jr., Miami, for appellee. <

This suit was brought to enforce collection of a claim for total and permanent disability based on a provision of a policy of insurance issued to complainant by the defendant Company, the pertinent portion reading: "If the insured shall become totally and permanently disabled, either physically or mentally, from any cause whatsoever, to such an extent that he (or she) is rendered wholly, continuously and permanently unable to engage in any occupation or perform any work for any kind of

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00098-CV Luminant Energy Company LLC, Appellant v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Appellee DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS PROJECT NO. 51617 OPINION In this direct appea

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is a suit to determine the disposition of the proceeds of a veteran’s life insurance policy. The real contestants are the surviving parents of the veteran as opposed to the claim of Donya Dee Kilgore on behalf of her illegitimate child, she contending that the veteran was the father of the child. The chancellor held that the proceeds should go to the child and the parents

CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which KEITH, J., joined. BATCHELDER, J., concurred in Part IV only. OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, Brownell Combs, II, Administrator C.T.A. of the Estate of Leslie Combs, II, deceased, appeals an order granting Defendant, International Insurance Company, summary judgment aga

162 A.2d 715 (1960) PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. Wilbur T. ROZAR, Individually and Wilbur T. Rozar, next of kin and personal representative of Isabella Rozar, Defendant. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle. June 16, 1960. C. W. Berl, Jr., of Berl, Potter & Anderson, Wilmington, for plaintiff. Wilfre

715 S.W.2d 615 (1986) Dorothy G. CHANDLER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Appellee. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Jackson. May 19, 1986. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied July 28, 1986. *616 Eugene J. Phelan and Eugene C. Gaerig, Memphis, for plaintiff/appellant.

This is a suit on a life insurance policy issued by the defendant on the life of Floyd M. Berry, naming complainant, the wife of the insured, as the beneficiary. The amount of the policy was $1,200. The original bill was filed in this cause by Emelia K. Berry on May 16, 1936, alleging that on the 13th day of May, 1935, the defendant issued the policy sued on on the life of her husband, Floyd M. Berry, naming complainant as the beneficiary. The bill further alleges that the policy was i

144 A.2d 234 (1958) The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. Anna W. FORD and C. Hammond Ford, Administrator of the Estate of Milburn R. Ford, Defendants. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle. July 18, 1958. C. W. Berl, Jr., Wilmington, for plaintiff. Wilfred J. Smith, Jr., Wilmington, for defendants. MAR

ACCEPTED 08-20-00171-cv EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS 08-20-00171-cv EL PASO, TEXAS

This was a suit by Pete U. Temples against the Prudential Insurance Company of America to recover on a group insurance policy, the master policy having been issued and delivered to his employer, the Nashville, Chattanooga St. Louis Railway, at Nashville, and the certificate on same having been issued to him providing for the payment of $2,000 for total and permanent disability; it having been alleged in the bill that the insured had become totally and permanently disabled by reason of accide