Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “Chanell Yates”
Mills v. Statepublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the
United States v. Rosario-Oquendopublic domain
PER CURIAM: Jose Rosario-Oquendo, through counsel, ■appeals his 800-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 5 kilograms of cocaine. Rosario-Oquendo argues that the district court erred (1) in applying a 4-level role enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a), and (2) in holding him accountable for more than 150 kilograms of cocaine. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
E.W. ("the mother") appeals the termination of her parental rights to her child, S.W. ("the child"). The mother has four children. One child lives with his father, one child lives with the maternal grandmother, and the other two children, including the child as to whom the mother's parental rights have been terminated, are in foster care. The *Page 169 child was born on November 25, 1999; at the time of her birth, the child tested positive
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOSE E. MARTINEZ, District Judge. THÍS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants Sustainable Growth Group Holdings, LLC (“SGG Holdings”) and Sustainable Growth Group USA, Inc.’s (“SGG USA”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (D.E. No. 78). Defendants SGG Holdings and SGG USA (collectively “Defendants”) seek summary judgment on Plaintiff Hedg
Marcus v. Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C.public domain
441 F.Supp.2d 1227 (2006) Paul R. MARCUS, Plaintiff, v. GARLAND, SAMUEL & LOEB, P.C., and Edward T.M. Garland, Defendants. No. 05-21550-CIVKING. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. Miami Division. July 2, 2006. *1228 Mary Margaret Schneider, Esq., Levey, Airan, Brownstein, Friedman et al., Coral Gables, FL, Counsel fo
Kolade Afolabi Adeyanju v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 7, 2009 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 7, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Amazing Paws v. Melissa Pedrazapublic domain
Opinion issued March 5, 2026. In the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00475-CV ——————————— AMAZING PAWS, LLC, Appellant v. MELISSA PEDRAZA, Appellee On Appe
DRC Parts & Accessories, L.L.C. v. VM Motori, S.P.A.public domain
112 S.W.3d 854 (2003) DRC PARTS & ACCESSORIES, L.L.C., Appellant, v. VM MOTORI, S.P.A., Appellee. No. 14-01-00507-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 7, 2003. *855 Dennis A. McQueen, Houston, for appellants. Stephen M. Fernelius and Warren Szutse Huang, Houston, for appellees.
JFJ Toys, Inc. v. Sears Holdings Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Paula Xinis, United States District Judge Pending is a Motion to Exclude the expert report and testimony of Peter Maga-Ihaes (ECF No. 82) and a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 71) filed by Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants JFJ Toys, Inc. and Fred Ramirez (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). The issues are fully briefed and the Court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6 because no he