Cases

Judgment rendered July 16, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,326-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Case Number: 10-04-00344-CV 01/03/2006 Case stored in record room 10/18/2005 Second m/e/t to file petition for review disposed Granted 10/10/2005 Second m/e/t to file petition for review filed 09/09/2005 M/E/T to file petition for review disposed Granted 09/07/2005 M/E/T to file petition for review filed OPINION Anthony Hardy ("Anthony") contracted Hepatitis A from eating tainted food at a Jack-in-the-Box. He sued Jack-in-the-Box for personal injuries

PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Neil Leonard Robinson, Jr. (“Robinson”), petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that his pretrial detention under a $500,000 bail bond is illegal.1 We conclude that the trial court set an excessive amount of bail, which is the functional equivalent of no bail. Consequently, we grant the petition, quash the order denying Robinson’s motion for reduction

5 So.3d 938 (2009) Jo Ann CHARLES, Kedrick Jackson v. Tyrone ROBINSON, City of New Orleans Police Department. No. 2008-CA-0036. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. February 11, 2009. Elizabeth M. Gaudin, Hilary G. Gaudin, Gaudin & Gaudin, Gretna, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant Jo Ann Charles. Detrich D. Hebert, Assistant City Attorney, Charlene C.

ORDER GERRILYN G. BRILL, United States Magistrate Judge. This Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Title VII and Section 1981 matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Leon Robinson’s Rule 4 Motion to Recover Fees for Service of Process and Motion for Extension of Time for Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. 11); Defendant Vipul Patel’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (Doc. 17); Plaintiff’s Motion for Leav

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CT-00265-SCT CHARLENE BILLIOT THOMAS v. BOYD BILOXI LLC ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/12/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LISA P. DODSON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: DAVID WAYNE BARIA EUGENE JOHN HOFFMAN, IV

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Mar 15 2017, 7:04 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM McHUGH, District Judge. The case before this Court raises important questions regarding whether a resolution agreement between a child and a charter school reached pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) should be enforceable against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Department of Education, as the State Education Agency, where the charter school has becom

FITZPATRICK, Judge. The Fauquier County Department of Social Services, the Fauquier County Community Policy and Management Team, the Fauquier County School Board, Fauquier Family Guidance Services, and the Fauquier County Family Assessment and Planning Team (appellants) appeal the placement of Timothy and Charlene Robinson’s daughter in a residential treatment facility. Appellants argue that: (1) the circuit court lacked juris

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 12, 2005 Session CHARLENE SINOR v. TIMOTHY BARR Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Davidson County No. 46-91-89 Betty Adams Green, Judge No. M2004-02168-COA-R3-JV - Filed February 7, 2006 Charlene Sinor (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for contempt seeking, in

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: Appellants Shanika Robinson and Leon Robinson were convicted of a number of offenses committed in connection with the armed robbery and murder of Shahabud-din Rana on August 18, 2009. 1 The principal issue before us, raised by Shanika Robinson, concerns the mens rea required for

GUIDRY, J. [ ^Defendant-appellant, the Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System (Board of Supervisors), appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, James Robinson, awarding damages in accordance with a jury’s verdict finding that the University of Louisiana at Lafayette Police Department (ULLPD) discriminated against Robinson *515

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 03-16329 February 18, 2005

Opinion CHIN, J. A jury convicted defendant Paul Eugene Robinson of five felony sexual offenses, all perpetrated against Deborah L. on August 25, 1994. Each was punishable by imprisonment in state prison for a maximum of eight *1112years. Therefore, the prosecution had to commence “within six years after commission of the offense[s]” to satisfy the a

17 A.3d 502 (2011) 128 Conn.App. 413 John M. HERASIMOVICH et al. v. TOWN OF WALLINGFORD et al. No. 31704. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued February 10, 2011. Decided May 3, 2011. *503 Vincent T. McManus, Jr., Wallingford, for the appellants (plaintiffs). Thomas R. Gerarde, wit

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On January 24, 2013, plaintiff YYZ, LLC (“plaintiff’) filed a patent infringement action against defendant Hewlett-Packard Company1 (“HP”) and against defendants Adobe Systems, Inc.2 (“Adobe”) and Pega-systems Inc.3 (“Pegasystems”) (collectively wi

Opinion issued September 14, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00917-CV ——————————— MARK HAYNES, DANIELLE MEGAN HAYNES, AND CHARLES EDWARD HAYNES, Appellants V.

MEMORANDUM * Charlene Demus appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the County of San Diego on her claims of racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 (“Title VII”); 42 U.S.C. § 1981; and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940. We affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the county on Dem

*938 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the Complaint to Determine Dis-chargeability and Request for Injunction filed by David Merle Durgin (“debtor”). The debtor appears by and through his attorney, Terry S. Stephens. Charlene Durgin (“defendant”) appears pro se.