Cases

ACCEPTED 05-14-00544-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 5/11/2015 10:04:41 AM

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PEREZ, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ANNIE J. BUTLER, ANTHO

Opinion issued August 20, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PERE

Opinion issued August 20, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIER EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PERE

525 S.E.2d 504 (2000) Ed T. GRIFFIN, d/b/a Ed T. Griffin Builders, Plaintiff, v. James H. SWEET, Jr. and wife, Debra H. Sweet, Defendants. No. COA99-95. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 7, 2000. *505 Dill, Fountain, Hoyle, Pridgen, Stroud & Naylor, L.L.P., by William S. Hoyle, Rocky Mount, for plaintiff-appellee.

Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 27, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01140-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND-DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LARRY

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 3737749 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/12/2015 4:19:03 PM

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

PER CURIAM: In Alabama, a person voting by absentee ballot must execute an “affidavit” in the presence of a “‘notary public or other officer authorized to acknowledge oaths or two witnesses 18 years of age or older.’ ” Ala.Code § 17-10-7 (1980).1 Section 17-10-9 of the code prescribes the physical form of the ballot and the affidavit. The affidavit form must be printed on an envelope. A second, sma

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

Dr. Clifford Black, a defendant in a case in the Calhoun Circuit Court, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Holley Lynn Comer, his former patient and the plaintiff below. After Dr. Black performed a laparotomy on Comer, Comer sued Dr. Black, stating claims based on several theories, including battery and, as eventually framed by the parties, a failure to obtain consent. The claims related to Dr. Black's surgical removal from Comer's abdomen of a tissue mass that turned out to

PER CURIAM: Following oral argument, we certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Alabama: WHETHER ABSENTEE BALLOTS THAT, ON THE ACCOMPANYING AFFIDAVIT ENVELOPE, FAIL TO HAVE TWO WITNESSES AND LACK PROPER NOTARIZATION (FOR EXAMPLE, BALLOT ENVELOPES THAT HAVE ONLY A SIGNATURE OR ONLY ONE WITNESS, OR ON WHICH THE VOTER AND THE NOTAR

116 F.3d 489 133 Lab.Cas. P 33,549, 3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 1792,97 CJ C.A.R. 1102 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 36 This petition for a writ of mandamus arises from a number of actions in which *Page 37 1,675 plaintiffs, all individuals who claim that they were injured by exposure to isocyanate1 while employed as coal miners, have sued

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

76 F.3d 413 69 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1687,67 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,884, 64 USLW 2563 Kathy SMITH, Plaintiff, Appellant,v.F.W. MORSE & CO., INC., Defendant, Appellee. No. 95-1556. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard Nov. 6, 1995.Decided Feb. 12, 1996.